- The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics, recent changes). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
- The community needs to complete required MediaWiki interface translations in that language (about localization, translatewiki, check completion).
- The community needs to discuss and complete the settings table below:
||Example / Explanation
||frs (SIL, Glottolog)
||A valid ISO 639-1 or 639-3 language code, like "fr", "de", "nso", ...
||East Frisian Low Saxon
||Language name in English
||Language name in your language. This will appear in the language list on Special:Preferences, in the interwiki sidebar on other wikis, ...
|Language Wikidata item
||Q149208 - item has currently the following values:
||Item about the language at Wikidata. It would normally include the Wikimedia language code, name of the language, etc. Please complete at Wikidata if needed.
||Is the language written from left to right (LTR) or from right to left (RTL)?
||Links to previous requests, or references to external websites or documents.
||"Wikipedia" in your language
||usually the same as the project name
|Project talk namespace
||"Wikipedia talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace)
||Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons.|
If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin").
Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP)
first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info
). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons.
||This needs to be an SVG image (instructions for logo creation).
|Default project timezone
||"Continent/City", e.g. "Europe/Brussels" or "America/Mexico City" (see list of valid timezones)
||For example, a Wikisource would need "Page", "Page talk", "Index", "Index talk", "Author", "Author talk".
||Anything else that should be set
|submit Phabricator task. It will include everything automatically, except additional namespaces/settings. After creating the task, add a link to the comment.
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Aside from being the butt of regional jokes, it is a reletively distinct variety spoken on the german border with the netherlands, keeping close ties with neighboring Gronings, both of which have a frisian substratum and are unintilligable to other low german varieties.
This language is slowly disapearing and strongly needs preservation.
- This is a legitimate language, so in all likelihood the proposal will be marked "eligible". If you're really serious about this, start creating content at Incubator, starting at incubator:Wp/frs. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:41, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose. This is a bad idea indeed. East Frisian (in spite of its name) is a dialect of Low German, and we have a Low German Wikipedia. In fact, its native name is given above as Plattdüütsk. As always, one can hold lengthy discussion on what constitutes a dialect of a separate language. And yes, East Frisian does differ from other Low German varieties. I can very well understand how East Frisian speakers have trouble collaborating with speakers of Westphalian on the same website. But granting East Frisian its own Wikipedia, or indeed aknowledging this proposal as eligible, would spell the end of the Low German Wikipedia. It would have to be split up into various dialect wikis: East Frisian, Westphalian, Eastphalian, Sleswegian, Mecklenburgian... When you start a Wikipedia in a language without a standardised form, you will always have to cope with dialect differences. As for being the butt of jokes: just silence your fellow Low Germans with excellent articles! :) Steinbach (formerly Caesarion) 10:15, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Valid point, the integrity of Low German Wikipedia is out of the question. My intention is to combine requests for East Frisian Low Saxon and Gronnings Wikipedia, considering they both belong to the same subgroup within the Low Saxon continuum and display similar Frisian characteristics, and form a unified standard, which would be the best. Both the Low German and nl-nds wikis alone cannot cover the broad scope of these two vernaculars. Eitanish 17:22, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.