Discuss the creation of this language project on this page. Votes will be ignored when judging the proposal. Please provide arguments or reasons and be prepared to defend them (see the Language proposal policy).
Ensure the requested language is sufficiently unique that it could not exist on a more general wiki.
Ensure that there are a sufficient number of native editors of that language to merit an edition in that language.
This proposal is on hold:
On hold pending someone (who actually knows the language) to start creating content on Incubator. For LangCom: StevenJ81 (talk) 14:52, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics, recent changes). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
"Wikipedia talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace)
Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons.
If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin"). Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons.
135x135 PNG derivative from a decent SVG image (instructions)
The reason why there needs to be a Luba-Lulua Wikipedia is that those speaking this language (most of them live in Central Africa) like a Wikipedia in their local language. --Peppa Pig the Second (talk) 09:45, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
While I don't oppose the creation of a Lua Wikipedia, judging from the namespace translation, this is a clear hoax based on somekind of Germanic language. --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 14:19, 19 June 2018 (UTC) (comment: prior to this edit)