The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics, recent changes). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
"Wikipedia talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace)
Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons.
If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin"). Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons.
@Novarussia: Fyi, this is an Ancient language, and normally such requests for Ancient languages are unlikely to be eligible except those for Wikisources, though there's a RFC that propose to raise the restriction, but by anyway, don't you think that you should add a summary under "Proposal" section above to describe why you wanna have such a Wikipedia? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:43, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Liuxinyu970226: I was going to write this but looks like you beat me to this. thanks! Also @Novarussia: I like the logo you designed. I think it’s much better than the grey ones most Wikipedias have. -Gifnk dlm 2020 (talk) 12:04, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Gifnk dlm 2020: Unfortunatelly, currently langcom think that this request should be rejected, plus the test wiki should be deleted as per , if you against, you may consult Yupik to explain your ideas. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:10, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Just no. All the arguments I had about Kamassian are valid here too. Nominator is not a native speaker, there is no native community, too much would have to be "invented" in order to write articles for it, which skews corpus work etc., and the same for the UI, which will never be translated. On a separate note, I can't imagine how on earth someone decided 𒀭𒋧 was an appropriate name for Wikipedia in Sumerian either. Sky-garlic, really? Nor does 𒀭𒋧 sound like Wikipedia. -Yupik (talk) 19:36, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Therefore I Oppose such a Wikipedia, because no people other than spammers are interested in it. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]