This proposal has been approved. The Board of Trustees and language committee have deemed that there is sufficient grounds and community to create the new language project.
A committee member provided the following comment:
The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
Language name in your language. This will appear in the language list on Special:Preferences, in the interwiki sidebar on other wikis, ...
Language Wikidata item
Item about the language at Wikidata. It would normally include the Wikimedia language code, name of the language, etc. Please complete at Wikidata if needed.
"Wikiversity talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace)
Enable uploads
no
Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons.
If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin"). Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons.
"Continent/City", e.g. "Europe/Brussels" or "America/Mexico City" (see list of valid timezones)
Additional namespaces
For example, a Wikisource would need "Page", "Page talk", "Index", "Index talk", "Author", "Author talk".
Additional settings
Anything else that should be set
submit Phabricator task. It will include everything automatically, except additional namespaces/settings. After creating the task, add a link to the comment.
Support - It will be more than just useful. Only the much time and effort would need is what I worry. Doatip (talk) 03:31, 20 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support It's useful for get an learning references in korean. -- Alpha for knowledge (Talk / Contributions) 04:07, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[Edited: 04:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC)/04:17, 3 December 2006 (UTC)]Reply[reply]
Support I think it's useful. --Yes0song 08:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support -- Rhythm 04:35, 9 February 2007 (UTC) I think, it is necessary and useful !!! -- Rhythm (talk) 06:41, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support - Seems to be useful because Korean "specific terms" (e.g.technical words) derived from Chinese and are very difficult to be understood.Whlee 13:18, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support - I used to link some articles about computer things to my Korean friends, I was kinda baffled to notice that the Korean section was taken down. --81.207.162.73 20:53, 24 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Strong support I have much confidence there are enough people to run this. (Red4tribe 16:04, 23 April 2008 (UTC))Reply[reply]
Support It'll be very useful.--Kwj2772 06:37, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support This project is very useful. --Albamhandae 11:12, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
--Ilaria - scrivimi 19:16, 18 August 2008 (UTC) I think Korean language has many contributors, so a wikiversity in this language can grow fastly :)Reply[reply]
support it would be helpful --Gapo 15:46, 6 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
General Comment - I would like to note that Korean Wikiversity was one of the original "demo" Wikiversities that was demonstrated for the original proposal. Unfortunately, it was put on en.wikibooks and subsequently deleted during a non-english content cleanup campaign. See this link for more details. If/when this is put up, I could suggest undelete some of that content, but it really wasn't more than a few pages. Still, the fact that it was even started at all more than two years ago (first edit was 20 August 2004) speaks volumes over the potential this could have. I hope the Korean speakers eventually get together enough to get this proposal accepted. --Roberth 18:07, 28 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
FYI Localisation is a precondition to final approval. Given that only 70.62% of the MediaWiki messages have been localised at this time, it falls short from what is expected of second projects for a language. Expected is localisation for all MediaWiki messages and all the extensions used in the WMF. GerardM 12:38, 5 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
please make this language wikiversity fastly.--Betalph 02:10, 5 October 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
For activity statistics, check here, not the above one. --관인생략 (talk) 03:04, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
KO Category (Korean Wikiversity in BETA) is activated. It has 250+ articles, default policies and guideline, many default templates. I think that Korean Wikiversity can be approved by committee :) --Sotiale (talk) 05:38, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Currently 74.49% of the MediaWiki messages and 11.54% of the messages used in extensions used by the Wikimedia Foundation have been localised at Betawiki. Thanks, GerardM 07:32, 4 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Currently 74.76% of the MediaWiki messages and 36.01% of the messages used in extensions used by the Wikimedia Foundation have been localised at Betawiki. Thanks, GerardM 07:27, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Currently 72.45% of the MediaWiki messages and 33.14% of the messages of the extensions used by the Wikimedia Foundation projects have been localised. Localisation of these messages is a requirement before your request is finally assessed. This is the recent localisation activity for your language. Thanks, GerardM 15:03, 12 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Currently 99.37% of the MediaWiki messages and 74.29% of the messages of the extensions used by the Wikimedia Foundation projects have been localised. Localisation of these messages is a requirement before your request is finally assessed. This is the recent localisation activity for your language. Thanks, GerardM 11:22, 23 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Core messages = Done, Extensions messages used by Wikimedia = Done – Kwj2772 (msg) 09:15, 23 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Done, Extensions messages used by Wikimedia = 
Done, Extensions messages used by Wikimedia = 
