From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

For help: please read MassMessage's help page or leave a message below!

Copy of "Help test better mass message delivery"[edit]

This message was sent out to nearly every person who's ever been involved with mass message delivery on the English Wikipedia or Meta-Wiki. Copied below for reference. --MZMcBride (talk) 15:40, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. You're being contacted as you've previously used global message delivery (or its English Wikipedia counterpart). It doesn't feel so great to be spammed, does it? ;-)

For the past few months, Legoktm has built a replacement to the current message delivery system called MassMessage. MassMessage uses a proper user interface form (no more editing a /Spam subpage), works faster (it can complete a large delivery in minutes), and no longer requires being on an access list (any local administrator can use it). In addition, many tiny annoyances with the old system have been addressed. It's a real improvement! :-)

You can test out MassMessage here: testwiki:Special:MassMessage. The biggest difference you'll likely notice is that any input list must use a new {{#target:}} parser function. For example, {{#target:User talk:Jimbo Wales}} or {{#target:User talk:Jimbo Wales|}}. For detailed instructions, check out mw:Help:Extension:MassMessage.

If you find any bugs, have suggestions for additional features, or have any other feedback, drop a note at m:Talk:MassMessage. Thanks for spamming! --MZMcBride (talk) 05:25, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Testing underway[edit]

testwiki:Special:Log/massmessage --MZMcBride (talk) 14:23, 1 October 2013 (UTC)


This is very cool, and it's nice that this feature is getting some support in the software so we can rely less on bots. I'm glad there's a log too, that was going to be one of my suggestions. Preview is also awesome.

Question: is there any way to stop a script while it's being sent? For example, if someone messes something up or jumps the gun, it might be better to stop it while it's queued (before it starts) or even midway through. It also might be nice to make an undo button, but that's a little less necessary since all administrators would be able to rollback anyway.

Also, the namespace restrictions are both good and bad. It's nice on a wiki like the English Wikipedia where all mainspace pages are articles and should not be posted on, but it's bad on wikis like Meta where Wikimedia Forum is in the mainspace and should be posted on. Will the extension respect that different wikis have different requirements and, even though you're sending something from enwiki where you can't post in the mainspace, you might be sending it to Meta-Wiki where you can?

Otherwise, looks pretty good. My only other comment would be to make it prettier, but I understand that's superficial and low on the feature list. ;) Cbrown1023 talk 14:39, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

CB: Thanks for the kind words. :-) Lego has worked hard to make this a really nice tool.
Re: stopping a delivery, I'm not sure there's much we can do here. In my mind, sending a message with MassMessage is similar to hitting "send" on an e-mail. There's no real recall mechanism, unfortunately. Given the architecture, I don't think we can pull jobs out of the job queue and even if we could, I'm not sure most admins would be fast enough (the jobs seem to get processed pretty quickly, with several hundred edits happening in the same minute, for better or worse). My general recommendation here was to try to catch errors prior to sending, including (but not limited to) requiring a preview of the message, attempting to catch unclosed tags (with a scary warning being issued to the sender), and explicitly telling the sender how many targets will be delivered to (I'm not sure if this ever got implemented...). Any additional ideas for preventing human error are more than welcome.
Re: namespace restrictions, this is a good point and I brought it up as well during design and development. Do you know of any wiki besides Meta-Wiki in which it's appropriate to post in namespace 0? My recommendation was to special-case Meta-Wiki in the configuration, but if there are other wikis where this would be a problem (I can't think of any off-hand), we may need a different approach.
Re: design: any and all suggestions welcome, of course. Lego sent a message to the design mailing list, but there were no replies (yet).
Thank you for taking the time to test out the new tool and provide feedback. It's very much appreciated. --MZMcBride (talk) 18:46, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
About the namespace restrictions, none of the content wikis that I can think of would require posting in the main namespace. The only ones I can think of are chapter wikis (like bewikimedia) or Meta-Wiki. We might be able to handle just doing special-case exemptions. It's helpful to restrict posting in the main namespace for most wikis, because that's often something people mess up -- people often link to Commons:Community portal instead of Commons:Commons:Community portal, and that restriction would catch those errors. Cbrown1023 talk 21:40, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
You can always block the bot as a worst case scenario, but that won't stop messages on other wikis, and it's possible that multiple deliveries are running at the same time.
For namespace restrictions, they can be configured per wiki and will apply to the wiki they are delivered to. So if metawiki allows posting in mainspace, you still wouldn't be able to post on enwiki's Main Page (not that it could bypass the protection...) and if you sent a message from enwiki (not allowing mainspace messages) to metawiki mainspace, it would work fine. Legoktm (talk) 21:31, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Checking bad input[edit]

Re: human error, it should probably ask the sender if neither ~~~~ nor ~~~~~ appears in the message. Also, is there any way it could check the interwiki links? A lot of people seem to mess that up. (Someone even sent out a message "correcting" the link with another broken link!) It should also warn the user if any mismatched tags appear, such as that case with the unclosed small tag that messed up quite a few pages. (Edit: I just realized this is already implemented! Great!) Require dir="ltr" somewhere? A way to edit the messages after sending them (if they still exist) would be great, but it relies on the bot's comment remaining in place, and would probably not work if anything was subst'ed. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:53, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

bugzilla:54848 tracks timestamp, and bugzilla:54846 is for interwiki links. I'm not so sure about dir="ltr", as that isn't something that would apply to all wikis. It should be trivial for someone to take the current HTML tag checking JS code and adapt it to check for dir="ltr" and set it up as a gadget on meta. Legoktm (talk) 21:18, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Better interface for translatable pages[edit]

It would be great to have a better interface for translated messages (e.g., Tech/News). PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:53, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

bugzilla:54839 (thanks for filing it!) Legoktm (talk) 21:22, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Warning for #target[edit]

Also, why not have it warn when the wikis in the #target are not valid? PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:53, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

bugzilla:54850 Legoktm (talk) 21:28, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Test results and feedback[edit]

Hi all. First off, thanks for your work on this. It's a substantial improvement over the previous process (which was already a godsend, don't get me wrong).

I tested out MassMessage with a target list that included both and, and that included a few intentional errors. Here are a couple things I noticed about what got delivered, and what didn't.

  1. My intentional misspellings (substituting User_talk:Jmargan_(WMF), a nonexistent account, for User_talk:Jmorgan_(WMF)) were caught and ignored.
  2. A message I sent to Testwiki:User:Jmorgan (WMF) seems to have been routed to Testwiki:User_talk:Jmorgan (WMF).
  3. I sent two messages to Test2wiki:User talk:Jmorgan (WMF). Only one of these messages were delivered.
  4. I sent two messages to Testwiki:User talk:Jtmorgan, one with the target template {{#target:User talk:Jtmorgan|}} and the other with target template {{#target:User talk:Jtmorgan}}. Only one of these was delivered (I'm guessing the message I sent with the target {{#target:User talk:Jtmorgan}}?).

In all of these cases, the bot did the right thing: it ignored bad input (#1), redirected a userpage post to the relevant talk namespace (#2), and ignored a verbatim duplicate (#3) and an effective duplicate (#4). However in #2, the bots behavior resulted in duplicate messages since I had also included User_talk:Jmorgan (WMF) as a target in my list. To avoid this kind of duplication in future, you might implement a step where the bot checks for any duplicates that would result from rerouting a target to the associated talk namespace. I'm curious whether the bot is set up to always redirect to talk namespaces, or if that's enabled on a per-namespace basis.

The namespace forwarding is currently only enabled for User --> User talk. It's configurable per wiki though. One issue with checking duplicates for namespace redirection is that we can't necessarily resolve namespaces for remote wikis. However, we probably should for local deliveries. Will file a bug in a moment. Legoktm (talk) 00:04, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

In #4, I'm also curious whether the bot recognized {{#target:User talk:Jtmorgan|}} and {{#target:User talk:Jtmorgan|}} {{#target:User talk:Jtmorgan}} (copy/paste error. <--This was what I meant Jmorgan (WMF) (talk) 15:53, 7 October 2013 (UTC)) as duplicates, or if it just doesn't recognize targets of the format {{#target:Namespace:Page|}}? If the second guess is correct, you might want to change that; I can anticipates that some users will include the domain parameter in all their targets, not just the cross-wiki ones.

If the site is not provided, internally it will complete it with whatever the local wiki is. So it did correctly recognize the two targets as duplicates. Legoktm (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

In all of these cases, it would be useful for me, as a user, to see a report of which messages were sent, and which ones weren't (and why) after I've submitted my message to the queue. This lets me know if there's anything I need to re-send. For some kinds of errors (like invalid targets), you might want to just perform some validation when the user previews, and ask them to correct the errors before they submit their message. The overall thrust of this recommendation is to make it more transparent to the user whether their messages were sent successfully.

  • "Page containing list" field: I like that this field includes some validation. It uses autocomplete to check if the page you're specifying actually exists, and throws an error if you preview with an invalid list page. For future versions, it would be nice to increase the degree of client-side validation so that it lets you know in real time if you've specified a nonexistent page, and won't let you proceed if so. See first example here [1]. Not a huge deal, but a good little tweak.
  • Confirmation: I always like to spot-check that my messages have been delivered. It would be useful to provide the user with a link to MessengerBot's contribs after they've submitted the message, so they can easily see which of their messages went through (on this wiki, anyway). If would be even more useful to provide MessengerBot contrib links for all the wikis that the bot delivered messages to. The current link to Special:Statistics doesn't really help me.
    I'm currently working on a way that you would get an Echo notification once your job finishes bugzilla:54861. I'm not sure that contribution links would be that helpful, since there can be multiple deliveries going on at once. There also is bugzilla:54253 which lightly touched on the idea of linking to contribs, but didn't make it into the final patch. I'll look into that again. Legoktm (talk) 19:01, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Signatures: In my first test, I signed my message with four tildes. After I clicked 'Preview', I saw that all that did was sign the message for MessengerBot, rather than signing it for myself, as was my intention. Shouldn't four tildes append the logged-in user's sig, and MessengerBot's sig be appended automatically to all messages? Also I agree with PiRSquared17 that the form should require the sender to sign all their messages.
    The way the backend works, is that the wikitext you added is literally added to the page as a new section. So any ~~~~ will automatically be assigned to the bot account. Legoktm (talk) 19:01, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

All in all, a bang-up job. Thanks to everyone involved in this project! Cheers, Jmorgan (WMF) (talk) 23:39, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for all of your feedback! I responded to a few things inline, have to go afk right now, and will respond to the rest once I get back. Legoktm (talk) 00:21, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Re signatures, you should probably use something like [[m:User:Jmorgan (WMF)|Jmorgan WMF]] ([[m:User talk:Jmorgan (WMF)|talk]]) ~~~~~. PiRSquared17 (talk) 01:08, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

WikiData newsletter[edit]

Apparently, the delivery of the WikiData newsletter was interrupted by a delivery sent out of the Signpost newsletter. I think that a new delivery request should "get in line", so to speak, and not have precedence over another Wiki newsletter. Postings should happen sequentially. Now, I need to look for someone at the top of the WikiData subscription list so I can cut and paste the newsletter from their Talk Page to my own.

This is all FYI, by the way. I imagine the chances of two Wiki newsletters being sent out during the same hour (especially on a Saturday) are probably low. But it's still a bug that could be looked at. Liz (talk) 17:22, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

@Liz: The problem is with GMD (EdwardsBot), not MassMessage. Currently MassMessage is only enabled on test wikis, and EdwardsBot (which I consider a kludge or hack (n1)) is currently used for cross-wiki message delivery. PiRSquared17 (talk) 17:26, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
I don't understand then because there was a link asking about the delivery service which brought me to this Talk Page. That's why I posted my comment here.
My apologies then. Liz (talk) 17:29, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Copy of "Beginning of MassMessage, end of EdwardsBot"[edit]

This message was sent out to every current EdwardsBot user. Copied below for reference. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:42, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. You're being contacted as you're listed as an EdwardsBot user.

MassMessage has been deployed to all Wikimedia wikis. For help using the new tool, please check out its help page or drop a note on Meta-Wiki.

With over 400,000 edits to Wikimedia wikis, EdwardsBot has served us well; however EdwardsBot will no longer perform local or global message delivery after December 31, 2013.

A huge thanks to Legoktm, Reedy, Aaron Schulz and everyone else who helped to get MassMessage deployed. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:36, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

User:MediaWiki message delivery[edit]

Someone complains that the user page is unclear and/or repetitive as regards who does what where. If someone has ideas to improve it without making it a verbose copy of this main namespace page, please be bold. --Nemo 10:59, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Err, yeah, I'm not sure why we need both User:MediaWiki message delivery and MassMessage. Can we redirect the user page(s)? Lego and others: thoughts? --MZMcBride (talk) 05:39, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
The idea is to sync that user page in all wikis (for instance with a mass message of that translatable page to MediaWiki message delivery's talk pages on all wikis), to have some contact info/explanation of the sort bots and scripts are sometimes asked to have. Sadly, interwiki hard redirects don't work. --Nemo 09:41, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Personal ruminations[edit]

Regarding this, Tilman is probably right... though the emerging bureaucracy surrounding the use of this tool is a bit painful to watch grow. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:32, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Mass Message Sender[edit]

This mass message is very useful. But in order to send a mass message you need to be an admin that's bad. Edwards Bot has an access list where some trusted non-admins were listed to sent spams through the bot. But with the MassMessage no non-admin will be able to send a spam. Now that's why I'm requesting to create a new group massmessage sender (can be added and removed by sysops) in active wikis or in those wikis where Edwards bot is working. So when Edwards Bot is left you can grant this right to the users who are in access list. --Pratyya (Hello!) 12:28, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

I see it's here at meta. But no in en.wikipedia. I was talking about that. Face-smile.svg --Pratyya (Hello!) 13:59, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Meta:MassMessage senders -- this group already exists, and admins can add people to it. PiRSquared17 (talk) 14:24, 2 December 2013 (UTC) Why don't you ask on w:WP:VPT or w:WP:VPP for a new group? PiRSquared17 (talk) 15:05, 2 December 2013 (UTC)


User:MediaWiki message delivery is flooding the RC. Would someone give it the bot flag (or globally perhaps)? The preceding unsigned comment was added by Glaisher (talk • contribs) .

This is something that the local community should decide. Please be cognizant of the fact that MassMessage, as its core, does little more than automate what any user could do with browser tabs without even logging in. Romaine (talk) 09:21, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
I completely agree with Romaine. :-) Which wiki's recent changes feed is being flooded? --MZMcBride (talk) 20:54, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Meta-Wiki request made here: Special:Permalink/6671423#Add MediaWiki message delivery to bot user group. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:08, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Not that I disagree, but if it was given the bot flag, then it could be added to MediaWiki:Echo-blacklist and prevent hundreds or thousands of accidental notifications, no? Technical 13 (talk) 16:06, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
MassMessage internally prevents creation of mention notifications. Legoktm (talk) 04:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

not working in[edit]

That's the log - ru:Служебная:Журналы/massmessage: I don't know, what's the reason of message delivery fail? What can we do? rubin16 (talk) 14:17, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi rubin16. I've filed bugzilla:58237 to track this issue. Thanks for the note! --MZMcBride (talk) 20:58, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
So the IP address "" is blocked on ruwiki, and that is the IP the extension uses internally, see localhost. If that IP can be unblocked, it should start working again. Legoktm (talk) 21:23, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Should MassMessage respect "retired" templates?[edit]

I've noticed ongoing delivery of messages to talk pages of retired editors, such as in this edit to User talk:Secret, who has {{retired}} on User:Secret.

  • Should MassMessage respect categories, or literal text on user pages?
  • Does MassMessage already have a "skip" mechanism, which should be described on retirement instruction pages (or implemented in {{retired}}) ? --Lexein (talk) 18:47, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
@Lexein: Hello! Happy New Year! :-) You should do the second using Category:Opted-out of message delivery per mw:Help:Extension:MassMessage#Opting_out. PiRSquared17 (talk) 18:56, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

MessMessage not working for the Signpost[edit]

Hi, Special:MessMessage isn't sending the Signpost to the list at w:Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Tools/Spamlist. Any thoughts? Ed [talk] [en] 04:31, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

@The ed17: this might only apply to global/Meta massmessages, but I think you need to use {{#target: }} syntax. See the help page mentioned at the top of this talk page. PiRSquared17 (talk) 04:36, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
I've been told that the subscription page needs to be updated so that Special:MassMessage can read it. Thanks for the quick reply! Ed [talk] [en] 21:57, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
See also mw:Thread:Extension_talk:MassMessage/Incompatible with existing recipient list format. Regards, Tbayer (WMF) (talk) 01:37, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

appearance in notifications / emails[edit]

When you are notified of a MassMessage-delivered message -- or get an email announcement of them -- it says: "MediaWiki message delivery left a message on your talk page." This seems like unintuitive wording -- I wasn't sure what was going on the first several times I got one (until I looked and saw it was a meetup notification, or a wikiproject newsletter, or whatever). I wonder if we can make this wording friendlier or more obvious? The best thing would be if we could pass a variable in the message (so "wikiproject x has left you a message"); second best might be to customize the notifications wording for this service (so "a project message or announcement has been left on your talk page"); third best might be to rename the service so it shows up differently ("Wikipedia announcement service left a message on your talk page"). Thoughts? -- phoebe | talk 02:47, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

eh, seems this is already / has been discussed at here and is filed as a bug [2]. -- phoebe | talk 02:52, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

What does it do?[edit]

allows a user to send a message to a list of users via special page "Special:MassMessage"

What does this actually do? Is it an e-mail, an Echo notification, an update to the user's talk page, or ?? I've read this page, the extension page, and its talk page, and none explains what happens. -- S Page (WMF) (talk) 21:45, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

It edits the talk page (resp. specified project pages), as is the usual way of talking to people on wikis. --MF-W 22:28, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
It also sends an Echo notification and possibly an email, depending on the user's settings. PiRSquared17 (talk) 22:32, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Template vs parser[edit]

In addition, on this wiki there is a wrapper template ({{target}}) that should be used for input lists.

Is it preferable to use the template from here, or merely an available option? Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 23:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Preferable to use the template. It provides a simple way to track usage, and makes any possible future migration nearly trivial, since it's just one template that needs updating, not hundreds of pages. Legoktm (talk) 04:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

new message at the top of the page[edit]

Is it somehow possible to set some markers at the list of targets so that MassMessage will deliver new messages not to the bottom of the user talk page (as usual) but, to some marked pages, - to the top of user talk page? Some users prefer such way of messages being received and I am not sure whether it's possible. If not, I would post to bugzilla rubin16 (talk) 09:26, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Basically you want to append it to the bottom of section=0 always. How would MassMessage sender know? A category on the talk page? A template? Technical 13 (talk) 15:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
  • For example, set it in the target list: # {{target | user = Rubin16 | append = bottom}} rubin16 (talk) 17:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. rubin16. This feature request has been brought up previously. bugzilla:31919 is the relevant bug for reversing post order on a per-page basis. There have also been requests to support arbitrary section posting by slot. For example, some village pumps would prefer to have a weekly newsletter always be the first or second post on the page; consequently they'd like the ability to do something similar to {{#target | page = Village pump | site = | section = 1}}. I doubt either of these enhancement requests will be implemented soon. --MZMcBride (talk) 18:20, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your answer rubin16 (talk) 18:28, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

How to send Mass Message with substituted template[edit]

Since the message I want to place is in the form of a template which has the title and etc. How can I do this? --///EuroCarGT 22:30, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

  • I almost always use a template to send a message (and suggest those requesting a message to create a table). Then, all I do is substitute the template in the message box. So, if your message was on User:EuroCarGT/Message_1, then you would put {{:User:EuroCarGT/Message_1}}. Technical 13 (talk) 22:39, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Now I got The subject line is empty? Thanks for the quick reply! --///EuroCarGT 22:45, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Put something in the subject line (That is the header, you will probably have to remove the header from the template and it probably isn't a good idea to have it in there anyways). Technical 13 (talk) 22:47, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
For example I want to send {{subst:Upload warning}}, and that template creates the level header, title and etc. If I put something in the text box, will it appear? --///EuroCarGT 22:49, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Was using that as an example :/. Well what I mean is the level 2 headers created by templates. --///EuroCarGT 23:02, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  • It was a bad example since it didn't illustrate your point. I suggest editing the template to allow for a parameter that allows you to disable the header for subst: using MMs. If you point me to the template you have in mind that adds the header, I'd be happy to add that optional parameter for you on one as an example of how it is done. :) Technical 13 (talk) 23:05, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
w:Template:TAFI weekly selections notice, thanks! EuroCarGT Mobile (talk) 23:10, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
  • The header in that template already has a switch to deactivate it. {{<includeonly>SUBST:</includeonly>#if:{{{1|}}}|| ==This week's [[WP:TAFI|article for improvement]] (week {{<includeonly>SUBST:</includeonly>CURRENTWEEK}}, {{<includeonly>SUBST:</includeonly>#time:o}})== }} is the code used which says if {{{1}}} exists, do not place the header. So, you would use {{TAFI weekly selections notice|no}} to send the message without the included header, but you will need to make sure that you put This week's [[WP:TAFI|article for improvement]] (week {{SUBST:<noinclude />CURRENTWEEK}}, {{SUBST:<noinclude />#time:o}}) in the "subject line". Technical 13 (talk) 23:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Multiple steps[edit]

Some village pumps (like the Italian Wikipedia one, for example) require a couple of steps before the message is really visible to all; 1) a page containing the message must be created; 2) the title of the page needs to be manually included on the one which displays discussion topics for that day. It doesn't really look nice/fair to have local wikipedians clean up after the message delivery; I guess there isn't a way to automate step 2 as well? Thanks. --Elitre (WMF) (talk) 15:16, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Not with MassMessage, no. Legoktm (talk) 21:20, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Author name[edit]

Name of the message author is not included into the message itself, in the one you deliver. It would make contacting the author more intuitive... Gryllida 09:32, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

You should be able to see it at the end of the message as a hidden comment. Something like <!-- Message sent by User:Foo@metawiki using the list at message delivery/Targets/Tech ambassadors&oldid=xxxxx --> --Glaisher [talk] 16:00, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

I'd like to see a couple of added-by-default items, perhaps with tick boxes or pop-up menus to set them:

  • Sign your name as (box showing wikitext, filled with my user/user talk pages at the local wiki)
  • Add date stamp at the end (always ticked by default)
  • Language used in this message (defaults to English for multilingual projects/local language for others).

This should stop some of the problems with LTR languages on RTL projects, missing date stamps, etc. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 16:52, 14 April 2014 (UTC)


The recent edits by User:MediaWiki message delivery on talkpages like MediaWiki talk:Common.css on ptwiki didn't show up in my watchlist. Is this the expected behavior? 16:49, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

If you have bot edits hidden then you shouldn't see the edits. Legoktm (talk) 21:17, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Oh, I see what you mean. That probably doesn't make sense then. Users will get a "You have new messages" indicator, so that's fine, but for other namespaces, they probably shouldn't be flagged as a bot. Legoktm (talk) 21:19, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
I think it would be good idea not to mark edits outside user talk pages as minor. Should I request that on bugzilla? 01:15, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
You mean as bot right? They shouldn't be marked as minor anyways. And yes please :) Legoktm (talk) 08:15, 12 April 2014 (UTC)