From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

German 100.000+ but not in the scroll-down-menu

Hi, I was told to ask here for this problem. German has now reached 100.000+ entries, but it is not included in the scroll-down-menu on the main wiktionary page. It should be there though. Can you fix it? 12:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes check.svg Done - Thanks for the info. --Barras talk 12:54, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ah thank you kind Sir and a happy new year! :) 15:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

RE: Somehow it has disappeared from the scroll-down-menu again. Could anyone fix it? 11:16, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The German Wiktionary is not supposed to be in the scroll-down menu. Wiktionary includes the top 15 Wiktionaries in the menu, rather than those with 100,000+ entries like Wikipedia. German is now in 17th, 3,700 entries short of the top 15. --Yair rand 18:31, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If I see it correctly, all wikts with over 100k entries are on the scroll-down menu exempt de. I think all wikt with +100k should be on this list. This would be the same as works. -Barras talk 19:48, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Not exactly: Italian, the 16th largest Wiktionary, is also not on the list even though it has 100,000+. I also agree that a 100k minimum would be better. If nobody objects, I would advise adding it and de, and changing the message from "Top 15, in alphabetical order by ISO 639 codes" to "100,000+ entries, in alphabetical order by ISO 639 codes". (Wikipedia sorts by romanization, but I don't see any reason for changing it from the current sorting method.) --Yair rand 20:31, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No objections from me. I think we should be consistent and do it the same way as on and so on. -Barras talk 20:36, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Could someone please sync with /temp? --Yair rand 21:20, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes check.svg Done Pmlineditor  10:03, 17 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
wooohoo~ thanks! that's much better now :) 12:12, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Portuguese is 100.000+ but is not in the 100 000+ column

Hello. The Portuguese Wiktionary has reached 100.000+ since January but it is not in the 100 000+ column... Would someone update this? Jesielt 22:20, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes check.svg Done. Pmlineditor  09:12, 19 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

pt.wikt is 10th

Hello! pt.wikt is now the 10th, sholdn't it take the place of "suomi" fi.wikt on the main table? Luan 02:29, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, it should. I've edited the /temp to place the Portuguese instead of the Finnish. Before it's synced, could someone verify that "artigos" is what the entries/articles are called on pt.wikt? I copied it from --Yair rand 04:39, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello Yair rand. On pt.wikt, we call the entries "verbetes" (plural). ;) Jesielt 05:01, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I've already changed the /temp page. Jesielt 05:03, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes check.svg Done Pmlineditor  07:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Consider using File:Bookshelf-40x201 6.png in the template instead, it has been optimized for file size, and is already in use at Change has already been made to template/temp.--Svgalbertian 00:53, 16 April 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes check.svg Done--Svgalbertian 14:15, 17 April 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please sync with /temp

Thank you. --Yair rand 01:16, 6 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Again. Jon Harald Søby 20:05, 25 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]


English wiktionary is more than Fr. 02:02, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes check.svg Done. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 05:52, 22 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ta Wiktionary in top 10

Tamil Wiktionary has come into top 10 wiktionaries with 190,690 entries. Please feature it appropriately at The translation of "Tamil/The free dictionary/190,000+ entries" is "தமிழ்/கட்டற்ற அகரமுதலி/190,000+ சொற்கள்" -- Sundar 09:56, 2 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes check.svg Done – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 06:50, 4 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks Minh. :) -- Sundar 11:56, 4 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]