ユニバーサルな行動規範/理事会批准の変更記録

ユニバーサル行動規範

• 方針
• 施行ガイドライン
• 調整委員会（U4C） 憲章
• プロジェクト概要
• よくあるご質問
• 研修モジュール

以下の一覧は理事会が批准手続きにおいてユニバーサル行動規範^※1に加えた改訂^※2を示します。これらの変更点は2020年10月13日受領分の規範草稿の透明性を増しあるいは盛り込まれた構想をより強固にするためです。（※：1＝Universal Code of Conduct。2＝revisions。3＝draft Code。）

変更	詳細説明
前文／"Why We Have .."
加筆："We are committed to ensuring that it remains so, including by embracing this Code of Conduct and revisiting for updates as needed."	理事会はこの取り組み（約束）の強調に意気込んでおり、本腰を入れて今後の改訂を推進します。
変更："This applies to all contributors and participants in their interaction with all contributors and participants, without distinction based on age, mental or physical disabilities, physical appearance, national, religious, ethnic and cultural background, caste, social class, wealth, language fluency, sexual orientation, gender identity, sex or career field. Nor will we distinguish based on standing, skills or accomplishments in the Wikimedia projects or movement." → "This applies to all contributors and participants in their interaction with all contributors and participants, without expectations based on age, mental or physical disabilities, physical appearance, national, religious, ethnic and cultural background, caste, social class, wealth, language fluency, sexual orientation, gender identity, sex or career field. Nor will we make exceptions based on standing, skills or accomplishments in the Wikimedia projects or movement."	Clarifying a point of confusion around the use of the term "distinguish".
2.1：相互に敬意を払う
変更後は "Listen and try to understand what Wikimedians of different backgrounds have to tell you." → "Listen and try to understand what Wikimedians of different backgrounds want to tell you."	明確化のため文字校正
加筆："All Wikimedians should assume unless evidence otherwise exists that others are here to collaboratively improve the projects, but this should not be used to justify statements with a harmful impact."	よくない言動を正当化しようと「善意に取る」（Assume good faith）を用いることは可能です。この概念は悪用が可能と明確に示したいと考えます。
加筆："During in-person meetings, we will be welcoming to everyone and we will be mindful and respectful of each others’ preferences, boundaries, sensibilities, traditions and requirements."	Boundaries are important specifically in physical contexts
3.1 嫌がらせ行為
変更："Behaviour can be considered harassment if it is beyond what a reasonable person would be expected to tolerate (given the cultural context and expectations of the people involved)." → "Behaviour can be considered harassment if it is beyond what a reasonable person would be expected to tolerate in a global, intercultural environment."	Emphasize that on international projects, local practices should not overrule an intercultural baseline for behaviour.
変更："In some cases, repeated mockery, sarcasm, or aggression may constitute insults collectively, even if individual statements would not." → "In some cases, repeated mockery, sarcasm, or aggression constitute insults collectively, even if individual statements would not."	明確化のため文字校正
変更："(The terms "race" and "ethnicity" are included here as prohibited ways to distinguish people. The Wikimedia movement does not endorse these terms as meaningful distinctions among people and believes that they should not be used outside of prohibiting them as the basis for personal attacks)." → "(The Wikimedia movement does not endorse "race" and "ethnicity" as meaningful distinctions among people. Their inclusion here is to mark that they are prohibited in use against others as the basis for personal attacks.)"	明確化のため文字校正
加筆："and may include contacting workplaces or friends and family members in an effort to intimidate or embarass" [to definition of harassment]	この言動は過去に攻撃の形態として用いられたという知識があるため許容されないことを強調します。 in the past.
加筆："or in situations where consent cannot be communicated" [to sexual harassment]	合意形成が真であると考えないことを明示。
変更："Hounding: following a person across the project(s) and repeatedly critiquing their otherwise satisfactory work mainly with the intent to upset or discourage them. If problems are continuing after efforts to communicate and educate, communities may need to address them but not via one individual's review" → "Hounding: following a person across the project(s) and repeatedly critiquing their work mainly with the intent to upset or discourage them. If problems are continuing after efforts to communicate and educate, communities may need to address them through established community processes."	The Board recognizes that volunteers play a critical role in making sure people are contributing constructively to the sites. We do want to be clear that hounding people even for mistakes is not appropriate behavior. Accordingly, we are embracing as a minimum standard that after initial efforts to correct and educate users, responsibility for addressing ongoing problems should shift from the individual to community processes.
3.3 – コンテンツの荒らしとプロジェクトにおける不正
変更："The gratuitous, unjustified and decontextualized addition of symbols, images, or any kind of content with the intent to intimidate or harm others (or to impose an arbitrary scheme on content)." → "The use of symbols, images, categories, tags or other kinds of content that are intimidating or harmful to others outside of the context of encyclopedic, informational use. This includes imposing schemes on content intended to marginalize or ostracize."	とりわけ英語が母語ではない話者に不明瞭と受け取られた用語。明確化を意図したが主な懸念は保持しました。
3.1 Harassment
Removed: " (Note: The Wikimedia movement does not endorse "race" and "ethnicity" as meaningful distinctions among people. Their inclusion here is to mark that they are prohibited in use against others as the basis for personal attacks.)"	The language created equity issues within our community and did not meet its intended purposes of supporting a safe and inclusive environment After reviewing community sentiment on this note at the community discussion and other venues, the Board of Trustees has resolved that it be removed from the Universal Code of Conduct.