Overview - Grant metrics[edit]

Please use the table below to report on your grant metrics, i.e. the shared metrics and grantee-defined metrics that were outlined in your proposal (in Table 3 of the proposal). This section should include outcomes achieved for all of your programs, reported either as a single total or by program. Where necessary, feel free to explain the context behind your outcome.

For more information, see the page on the grant metrics requirement.
I'd like to add a column that say "Target" between the Metric and Achieved outcome columns. See this mock up for what I mean.-- Shouston (WMF) (talk) 21:33, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Metric	Achieved outcome	Explanation
Shared metric: Total participants
Shared metric: # of newly registered users
Shared metric: # of content pages added or improved across Wikimedia projects
FILL IN: Grantee-defined metric #1
FILL IN: Grantee-defined metric #2

Telling your program stories - all programs[edit]

I only made a very small edit & replacement in the second sentence -- Shouston (WMF) (talk) 21:33, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Please tell the story of each of your programs included in your proposal. This is your chance to tell your story by using any additional metrics that aren't included in the grant metrics section above ~~(beyond global metrics) that are relevant to your context, beyond the global metrics above~~. You should be reporting against the targets you set at the beginning of the year throughout the year. We have provided a template here below for you to report against your targets, but you are welcome to include this information in another way. Also, if you decided not to do a program that was included in your proposal or added a program not in the proposal, please explain this change. More resources for storytelling are at the end of this form. Here are some ways to tell your story.

We encourage you to share your successes and failures and what you are learning. Please also share why are these successes, failures, or learnings are important in your context. Reference learning patterns or other documentation.
Make clear connections between your offline activities and online results, as applicable. For example, explain how your education program activities is leading to quality content on Wikipedia.
We encourage you to tell your story in different ways by using videos, sound files, images (photos and infographics, e.g.), compelling quotes, and by linking directly to work you produce. You may highlight outcomes, learning, or metrics this way.
We encourage you to continue using dashboards, progress bars, and scorecards that you have used to illustrate your progress in the past, and to report consistently over time.
You are welcome to use the table below to report on any metrics or measures relevant to your program. These may or may not include the global metrics you put in the overview section above. You can also share your progress in another way if you do not find a table like this useful.

Resources[edit]

Removed the Global Metrics part of these evaluation resources -- Shouston (WMF) (talk) 21:33, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Resources for evaluation[edit]

Logic Models provide a framework for mapping the pathway from inputs to outputs to outcomes. Develop a logic model to map out your theory of change and determine the metrics and measures for your programs based on that logic model.
Both qualitative and quantitative measures are important so consider both as you determine measures for evaluation and be sure to ask the right questions to be sure to capture your program stories.