User talk:80.114.178.7

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

{{unblock declined|1= At [[:nl:wikt:talk:salade]] I commented about the [http://nl.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Overleg:salade&diff=1686919&oldid=1301629 irregular diminutive] of that word * 3 minutes later [[:nl:wikt:Gebruiker:Mathonius|Mathonius]], who hadn't contributed at nl.wiktionary for more than 10 days, [http://nl.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=checkuser&oldid=1686921 created] [[:nl:wikt:checkuser]], which included the diminutive "checkusertje" * Mathonius knows that "checkusertje" isn't used often in Dutch *: "checkuser" is wiki termology and even writing the diminutive of nickname ("schuilnaampje") is enough to get blocked at nl.wikipedia. I used that example and got '''globally''' blocked by Mathonius for using that word. That shows why people won't use "checkusertje" or "stewardje" in Dutch. * I took some time to write that answer at talk:salade (check my [[:luxo:80.114.178.7|global contributions]]), Mathonius almost immediately added some words of which they should know the usage is extremely limited, I gave Mathonius an example why "checkusertje" won't be used often and then they globally blocked me for giving that example. * Mathonius has been stalking me before, see e.g. http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Matanya&diff=5460145&oldid=5459149 *: see also the [http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3A129.125.102.126 blocklog at meta] of my previous IP, which is filled by one user. * Their [http://nl.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Overleg_gebruiker:Mathonius&diff=1686936&oldid=1686929 answer] is somewhat euphemistic (they ''did'' something with it, they had already globally blocked the opposing view). * Even if giving that example (''schuilnaampje'') is reason to be globally blocked, Mathonius shouldn't have blocked me. They should have asked another steward to block me. --[[Special:Contributions/80.114.178.7|80.114.178.7]] 23:35, 22 June 2013 (UTC) |2=reasons for block where expressed and there has been no evidence that there will be a change of approach that initially caused the issue. Allow to expire naturally. — [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 00:06, 17 August 2013 (UTC)}}

Comment by Mathonius
There are some misunderstanding in the statement above, such as the reason for the blocks (which aren't based on content disputes), but anyone and everyone can check these themselves. Please note that this is ErikWarmelink, who has a long history of cross-wiki stalking, rude and inappropriate behaviour, and plain harassment, having resulted in two global locks and several global blocks so far. ErikWarmelink continued his usual misbehaviour at the Dutch Wiktionary by trolling and treating me in an offensive manner, while he was already blocked on Commons and the English Wikipedia for block evasions. Therefore, this is a cross-wiki problem, which is why I chose to block him globally as soon as I realized this was ErikWarmelink again. I've also blocked him on Meta, because he has been misbehaving here multiple times as well (see for examples here), and I wanted to prevent any more harm. I feel like discussing ErikWarmelink's case any further will be tiresome and very undesirable, so I'd rather not make any more comments about it. This time, I was the one being attacked by ErikWarmelink, so maybe I wasn't the right person to take action as a steward and administrator, but I'll leave it up to another steward and/or administrator to judge if I've acted inappropriately or not. He or she should feel free to overrule my decisions, preferably without any further consultation with me. Thanks, Mathonius (talk) 09:14, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that I am Erik Warmelink, not ErikWarmelink. I did have the accounts User:Erik Warmelink and User:ErikWarmelink, though. The accusations above are ambiguous, they can be read as if I would have stalked and/or harassed people. That would be untrue, and I ask Mathonius to retract or corroborate those accusations. --80.114.178.7 11:00, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am sometimes rude to pseudonyms, but IMHO only when appropiate.
If I am already blocked at the wikis where my editing is considered block evasion, the alleged cross-wiki problem has already been locally solved. However, it does also block me on wikis that value my contributions. Not allowing me to use my talk page at e.g. w:nds-nl: is quite harsh. One may note that nds-nl experienced a lot of vandalism in the 20 minutes before you answered here, one might also note that a Dutch SWMT member has been trying hard to not edit w:nds-nl:Nijverdal, but w:nds-nl:Raolte, w:nds-nl:Eierkuuln, and w:nds-nl:Marle (Healdern). I have firewalled some IP ranges with many open proxies, so I don't know whether galgje tried to send another email. --80.114.178.7 11:00, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I would also like to point to User talk:Matanya#personal attacks, harrasment (especially diff 3982845). One might also want to look at User:129.125.102.126 (including the edits, like these three and block log). More than two years ago, Mathonius was already trying to get me blocked on nds-nl. --80.114.178.7 11:00, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please note http://nl.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Overleg_gebruiker:Mathonius&diff=2029494&oldid=1750430 which "archived" the (then) newest topic to a talk page. --80.114.178.7 08:36, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@billinghurst (reasons for block where expressed and there has been no evidence that there will be a change of approach that initially caused the issue. Allow to expire naturally in the template)

Thanks for answering. It's a bit disappointing that you don't address the issues. Yes, Mathonius "expressed a reason" for the block, but https://www.google.nl/search?q=checkusertje now gives no results at all. I don't think such words should be to added to dictionaries (1st issue). I certainly don't think that stewards should block people opposing their own edits for 3 months on all wikis of wikimedia.org (2nd issue). --80.114.178.7 23:39, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
My comment about your request for unblock was in relation to your local block only. From the steward aspect, from my knowledge of Mathonius, I have yet to see them block a person maliciously. The process for requesting for a global unblock is via SRG anyway, and I doubt that we would action it on a user's meta talk page. If you are carrying on about the existence or otherwise of the word checkuser (a wiki created word) and its translation into another language, then all I can do is shake my head in disbelief, surely there are better things to do on wikis, in the world, anywhere. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:24, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
How could I edit Steward requests/Global after the person who globally blocked me, blocked me at meta too? And that's why "per global block" should make you look at the reason for the global block (also by Mathonius). --80.114.178.7 23:13, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The word wikt:nl:checkuser is loaned into Dutch, its diminutive wikt:nl:checkusertje isn't used yet, for much the same reason why wikt:nl:schuilnaampje isn't used often: its use leads to stalking (online and offline) and blocks. I don't care too much about checkusertje, but I do care about being blocked globally for 3 months because I disagreed with the blocker. --80.114.178.7 23:13, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:80.114.178.7&oldid=18973637"