User talk:Jusdafax
Welcome[edit]
Welcome to Meta![edit]
Hello Jusdafax, and welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). If you would like, feel free to ask me questions on my talk page. Happy editing! Cirt (talk) 07:23, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Cirt (talk) 07:23, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
About your RFC comments[edit]
Maybe we could make an RFC about whether or not a community investigation of the WMF should take place? 96.237.20.248 19:23, 23 January 2016 (UTC) @Jusdafax:
Clinton[edit]
Jusdafax, what's the problem with Hillary Clinton? Her engagement for the private prison belt? How does this affect us? I'm referring to your core team questions. Cheers --Sargoth (talk) 10:32, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Please note I have not said there is a "problem." I am asking for clarification regarding the choice of williamsworks whose CEO is closely identified with a prominent politician. I have no idea what you mean by "private prison belt." Jusdafax 10:44, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Clinton was running for president of the united States of America. But before that, she'd already been secretary and an influential politician. As that, she had close relations to the private prison industry (sort of a modern slave industry, you're locked up and forced to work and private people make profit out of it) and supported a "three strikes and you're out"-policy, which brings people directly into this slavery farms and is very harmful for less privileged people. So when you're liberal, for instance, or have respect for humans, you're very opposed to what she did when she was in power. Regards, --Sargoth (talk) 11:36, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. Without going into HRC's history, I find Ms. Williams an interesting person to give so much clout to in Wikipedia's visioning process, and fail to see apparent transparency regarding the WMF proceedings that chose her consulting firm, hence my 5 questions. I believe asking questions is a part of the way this is intended to work. Jusdafax 11:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, thanks for bringing up those topics. The answers might be quite enlightening. Cheers --Sargoth (talk) 13:02, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. Without going into HRC's history, I find Ms. Williams an interesting person to give so much clout to in Wikipedia's visioning process, and fail to see apparent transparency regarding the WMF proceedings that chose her consulting firm, hence my 5 questions. I believe asking questions is a part of the way this is intended to work. Jusdafax 11:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- Clinton was running for president of the united States of America. But before that, she'd already been secretary and an influential politician. As that, she had close relations to the private prison industry (sort of a modern slave industry, you're locked up and forced to work and private people make profit out of it) and supported a "three strikes and you're out"-policy, which brings people directly into this slavery farms and is very harmful for less privileged people. So when you're liberal, for instance, or have respect for humans, you're very opposed to what she did when she was in power. Regards, --Sargoth (talk) 11:36, 8 April 2017 (UTC)