User talk:SCP-2000

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Current discussions | Archive 1 (2019 - 2022)

Unpost 100 edit system[edit]

LTA for you, stewards should check Sakura emad in ckbwiki 13:45, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

pardon? LTA? i have no idea what you saying. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 13:52, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Edit warring on TOU project page[edit]

Hello, I don't know you, you don't know me, but it is you that is editing warring, and I'm not in the mood for it. Slow your roll, please, and be a little kinder in your choice of words and actions. I am editing in good faith, plus you're charged with always assuming good faith. I will be requesting oversight or an office action because of your choice to use defamatory, libelous, and overstated edit summary choice of scurrilous wording. My rep was pristine for 11 years before this kind of behavior became directed at me. Do what you can to mitigate that which you've already started, as it feels like a personal attack. My hands are clean here. I would appreciate it. Going forward, don't edit war during a discussion. Thanks. Take care always. Cheers! WikiWikiWayne (talk) 19:21, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@WikiWikiWayne you edited a Wikimedia Foundation Legal department page and got reverted by a WMF user (the foundation's legal director) who directed you to the talk page [1][2]. Instead you showed the same behaviour which got you blocked on enwiki yesterday by acting aggressively towards others, not listening to them, insisting on your unapproved edit and making accusations such as the one this talk page. The linked edit summary does not violate any rule and is much more in line with Meta:Civility then your message to SCP-2000.
Yes you edited in good faith, but when a WMF account asks you not to edit a page governed by the WMF and directs you to the talk page, there should have been no further reverts from you. Thanks for your understanding. Johannnes89 (talk) 07:13, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Johannnes89 (A) - Nearly everything you state here is wrong, off base, conflated, backward to the time stamps, toxic, in bad faith, stale, odd timing, and assumes bad faith. At minimum, I feel attacked and maligned when I am here in good faith. If you're an admin, I feel you should be held to a higher stand. Go pick on a troublemaker. Please self-revert. Thanks. Take care always. Cheers! WikiWikiWayne (talk) 12:09, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reminder to Share Feedback: Leadership Development Plan[edit]

Hi Everyone,

You have a few days left to share your feedback! The Leadership Development Working Group (LDWG) would love to hear your thoughts on the Leadership Development Plan. The review period closes on May 28, 2023, end of day. Share your feedback via survey, MS Forum, talk page or email at

Thank you!

Best, Cassie Casares (talk) 22:26, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]