User talk:Vanamonde93
Welcome to Meta![edit]
Hello, Vanamonde93. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum if you need help with something (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!
-- Meta-Wiki Welcome (talk) 23:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
The Community Wishlist Survey[edit]
Hi,
You get this message because you’ve previously participated in the Community Wishlist Survey. I just wanted to let you know that this year’s survey is now open for proposals. You can suggest technical changes until 11 November: Community Wishlist Survey 2019.
You can vote from November 16 to November 30. To keep the number of messages at a reasonable level, I won’t send out a separate reminder to you about that. /Johan (WMF) 11:24, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Unblock request on English Wikipedia[edit]
Dear Vanamonde93,
First of all, I would like to apologize if this is not the appropriate venue for presenting my case to establish my innocence. I am writing to appeal against the recent block imposed on my english wikipedia account, where I have been mistakenly accused of being a sockpuppet of Ghalbeyakh and alleged involvement in the article Qatari soft power.
I would like to emphasize that I have no connection whatsoever with Ghalbeyakh or any affiliation with the purported group related to the article Qatari soft power. Until recently, I was entirely unaware of this user and their associated group, and I had no knowledge of the mentioned article.
Contrary to the accusations, I am a university student currently residing in Pakistan. My activities on Wikipedia are limited to using Pakistani IP addresses, in stark contrast to the accused users who predominantly use German IPs. Additionally, I have no awareness or association with the Nimbleway network, as suggested in the investigation.
I kindly request a thorough review of the evidence presented against me, as I believe there is a misunderstanding or misattribution in this case. I am more than willing to provide any further information or clarification necessary to demonstrate my innocence in this matter.
Thank you for your time and understanding.
Regards, Pakieditor (talk) 19:45, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- The correct place to appeal your block is on the English Wikipedia on your talk page, as I see you have now done. I'm sorry, but based on CU evidence I do not find your explanation credible at all. However, I will let another CU take a look at your appeal, and perhaps they will see it differently. Vanamonde93 (talk) 20:18, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the reply. Pardon me but could you please clarify the meaning of " based on CU evidence"? I have been trying to grasp its meaning for hours but no avail. Maybe then, I might be able to write a better unblock appeal to prove my innocence. Pakieditor (talk) 20:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- A CU is a CheckUser. Vanamonde93 (talk) 20:53, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the reply. Pardon me but could you please clarify the meaning of " based on CU evidence"? I have been trying to grasp its meaning for hours but no avail. Maybe then, I might be able to write a better unblock appeal to prove my innocence. Pakieditor (talk) 20:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)