Steward requests/Bot status

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Steward requests(Redirected from SRB)
Jump to: navigation, search
For bot status on Meta-Wiki, see the bot policy and request page.
Requests and proposals Steward requests (Bot status) latest archive
This page hosts requests for a bot flag on a Wikimedia wiki with no bureaucrats. Please read the instructions before posting a request. Do NOT post your request here until you get community approval (ie, don't list your bot here if you haven't consulted the local wiki for at least a week, or whatever local policies dictate).

Previous requests are archived.

Crosswiki requests
MetaWiki requests

Instructions[edit]

Before posting here[edit]

If there is a bureaucrat on the local wiki, please ask them to fulfill your request using Special:UserRights on the relevant wiki. Before requesting access here, make sure to obtain consensus on the local wiki if there is a community (see the index of request pages). If there is no local community, request on this page with a note to that effect. You can ask local bot flag directly here for some wikis in some cases (see automatic approval).

Remember to read the local project's bot policy. This should be linked from the local bot request page; a few are listed below. DO NOT post your request here without having fulfilled the local policies first, and having waited for at least a week to gauge community opinion.

Project Languages
Wikipedia

af an ar ast az bar bat-smg bcl be be-x-old bg bn br bs ca ce co cs da de dv en eo es eu fa fi fr frp frr ga gl hak he hi hif ht hu hy ia id ie ig io is it iu ja ka kab km ko krc ksh ku kw lad lb lmo ln lt lv map-bms mg mhr min mr ms mt myv nap nds ne nl no nv oc os pdc pl ps pt rmy ro ru si sk sl so sr su sq sv szl th to tr uk uz vec vi vo wo wuu yi yo zea zh zh-classical zh-min-nan zh-yue

Wikisource

de en hy it ru vi zh

Wiktionary

af ar br de en es fr fy ga gd gl id is it ka ko lt ms nl no pt ro th tr uk vo wa zh

Wikibooks

cs de en es fr fy ko zh

Wikinews

ar de en es fa fr ru tr

Wikiquote

en fa fr hy it ka ru zh

Wikiversity

ar en fr de it el ru

Wikivoyage

de en es fr pt it nl sv zh

Wikimedia

Commons Meta Wikidata Wikispecies

Making a request[edit]

  1. Place the following code at the bottom of the "Bot status requests" section below:
    === Bot name@xxproject ===
    {{sr-request
     |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
     |domain    = 
     |user name = 
     |discussion= 
    }}
    (your remarks) ~~~~
    

    You can use following form when applying global bot status:

    === Global bot status for <yourbotname> ===
    {{sr-request
     |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
     |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
     |user name = 
     |discussion= 
    }}
    (your remarks) ~~~~
    
  2. Fill in the values:
    • 'domain': the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
    • 'user name': the bot's user name (like "ExampleBot"). Leave it blank if you're requesting access for multiple bots.
    • 'discussion': a link to the local vote or discussion about the bot (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Bots#ExampleBot]]"). Notes: If there is no local vote or discussion, please say so below the template and explain why not. If there's no community, implement the standard bot policy instead.
  3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.


Global bot status requests[edit]

Global bots are enabled on most wikis using the standard bot policy (see list of global bot wikis and global bot access requirements). Request will typically be left open for several days to allow comments. Please add requests at the bottom of this section.

Bots in vec.wiktionary[edit]

Status:    In progress
This message was placed on my user discussion place, but IMHO it should be better placed here. Please or activate the global bot policy on Vec.wiktionary or give the local bot flag to JAnDbot. Carsrac (talk) 15:35, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi, in vec.wiktionary the bot that works most is User:JAnDbot, but it has no bot flag. We discussed about it because we don't have any bureaucrat, and wanted to change our policy here in Meta. We had already discussed, and got consensus. How can we officially confirm our global bot policy? --Tn4196 (talk) 12:23, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Any steward can activate your global bot policy. But maybe it better to ask for User:JAnDbot a local botflag as the whole global bot is under discussion. Carsrac (talk) 15:30, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Activated the global bot policy on vec.wiktionary (but someone still needs to do the paperwork). A separate discussion will need to take place for the global bot flag. --Rschen7754 05:35, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Removal of global bot status[edit]

Please see the policy for global bots for the requirements that must be met for global bot access.

Bonjour a tous, il y aurait ce compte [1] qui a été bloqué globalement, il reste ensuite a retirer le statut de bot global. Cordialement. FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 23:55, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Bot status requests[edit]

Please add new requests at the bottom of this section.

Bot operators making bulk requests, please consider applying for global bot status and helping implement the standard bot policy on small wikis to simplify and streamline the bulk request process.

Isabaevacheebot@ky.wiktionary[edit]

(I am requesting on behalf of Chinara Isabaeva, bot master, and Kyrgyz wikitionary community. Best regards, Daniiar) Kyrgyztil (talk) 10:46, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

The bot owner has 1 edit globally (=the request). The bot has none at all. Why is that? --MF-W 11:50, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Update: The bot has made now between 50 and 100 edits. Carsrac (talk) 11:05, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, I did't get it. Could you explain what do you mean. I apologize if it is dumb question. unsigned comment by Kyrgyztil (talk) 14:22, 6 September 2014
We (Kyrgyz language wiki volunteers) are trying to develop Kyrgyz wiktionary, so we created team and our team member Chinara Isabaeve will work with the bot. In addition to Kyrgyz community we also had communication with Wiki person - Pathoschild. Hope it clarifies [User:Rahat] unsigned comment by Rahat (talk) 15:50, 6 September 2014
Dear MF-Warburg, can you suggest what shall we do to register the bot correctly and promptly? It is really and really important for Kyrgyz Wiktionary community. Best, [User:Daniiar] unsigned comment by Kyrgyztil (talk) 06:18, 9 September 2014
Rahat has been talking to me by email. He and some friends intend to add a large number of words to kywiktionary by bot. I suggested they begin slowly editing with the bot to test it out, and asked about the copyright status of the content they intend to add. —Pathoschild 13:21, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
This is not correct place to talk about copyright. But slowly editing with a bot without a flag is good for testing. The rate is now 20 edits a day. I suggest to give the flag to the bot. It looks like the local community is accepting the changes without major corrections. Carsrac (talk) 11:05, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

danzanjamts[edit]

(your remarks) Danzanjamts (talk) 08:56, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Is there a community discussion somewhere? Why do you want a bot flag? And it's probably best if you create a separate account for a bot, don't you think? --MF-W 13:46, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Answer (for MF-W) - I Mongolian Wikipedia administrator.Continuously since 2008, often included articles. Of course, the replacement done. As you can see by clicking on the contributions. I'm Mongolian Mongolian Wikipedia are very poor. Spend with my heart in my body every day, your support is very processed. "Like Sverker Johansson (Lsjbot)". Mongolian Wikipedia grows 10-15 articles per day.Wikipedia resource for me to devote my heart for always and will continue to devote.Swedish admin (Lsjbot) for more than 1 million high and low quality articles like drops alone, I like to support this is my wish. Please give your support (mongolian language:Та дэмжиж өгнө үү) --Danzanjamts (talk) 20:59, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
@Danzanjamts: You will need a separate bot account, and you should explain in detail what the bot is going to do... Snowolf How can I help? 15:15, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Revibot@some ko projects[edit]

Double redirect fixing bot, all wikis have automatic approval.(See Bot policy/Implementation) I will always monitor bots' edit. — revi 15:23, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikibooks does not have automatic approval. Ruslik (talk) 17:40, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Yes, you're right. Please do other wikis (except kowikibooks) then. I'll ask for a local consensus on global bot and automatic approval. — revi 18:48, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done Ruslik (talk) 19:05, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Removal of bot status[edit]

If a specific user is abusing his/her bot status, you may request removal of the status on his account here. Please be sure to provide a short explanation on the current situation, along with links to the bot's contribution and an announcement in your community of the abuse. Previous requests are archived.

hy.wikipedia[edit]

Смотрите обсуждение[edit]

Comment[edit]

Is there anybody who could give a translation or summary of what the discussion about? Bennylin 06:00, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

From a machine translation, is it correct to say that hy.wp community wants those bots to be unflagged because they're a potential threat and/or inactivity? For globally inactive bots, I believe there are other mechanism that will deflagged them, but for an inactive bots in a project I don't think they're posing any risk of running wild or anything like that. Could you explain your reasoning in this page? (In your language or second language other than English is fine too). Bennylin 06:34, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Bennylin, могу сказать, что не все боты имеют глобальные флаги, большинство имеют сразу два флага: и глобальный, и местный. Плюс к этому смотрите эту страницу:Requests for comment/Inactive Global bot accounts--6AND5 (talk) 17:36, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Let me clarify/confirm this. Those are interwiki maintenance bots with local flags given years ago for that task. They are inactive for 1.5-3 years, now. Bot activity is not being monitored on hy:WP, so if abandoned account get in wrong hands, damage done won't be noticed fast. Alternative solution would be to block all passive accounts, and unblock per bot master request with description of new tasks planned, but deflagging seemed like a first option. I've also fired RfC on inactive Global bots based on same concerns related to Global bot accounts. --Xelgen (talk) 18:26, 17 October 2014 (UTC)