Steward requests/Global permissions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Steward requests(Redirected from SRGP)
Jump to: navigation, search
Requests and proposals Steward requests (Global permissions) latest archive
This page hosts requests for global permissions. To make a request, read the relevant policy (global rollback, global sysop, ...) and make a request below. Explain why membership is needed for that group, and detail prior experience or qualifications.
This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.
Successful global rollback requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion, while successful global sysop discussions require no fewer than 2 weeks.
Crosswiki requests
MetaWiki requests


Requests for global rollback permissions[edit]

Symbol comment vote.svg Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the Global rollback policy.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You have sufficient activity to meet the requirements to be allocated the global rollback flag
  2. You have a global account;
  3. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable.
=== Global rollback for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = Username
}}

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than 5 days (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.

Requests for global sysop permissions[edit]

Symbol comment vote.svg Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the Global sysops policy.
Stewards
When you give someone global sysop rights, please list them on Users with global sysop access and ask them to subscribe to the global sysops mailing list.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable. If you previously requested that right, please add a link to the previous discussion(s).
=== Global sysop for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = global <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = Username
}}
:''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+2 week}} UTC''

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than two weeks (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.

Requests for global IP block exemption[edit]

Symbol comment vote.svg Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review Global IP block exemption. Not all rights changes are notified here; please watch Special:Log/gblrights to see them all.
Please note: Global IP block exemption does NOT make one immune to locally-created blocks of any sort, only global blocks created via Special:GlobalBlock.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting global IP block exemption, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To request global IP block exemption
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why you need the access and why you're suitable. If needed, link to relevant discussions.
=== Global IP block exempt for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = 
 |discussion=
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a short period of consideration (typically 5 days). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.

Requests for global rename permissions[edit]

Symbol comment vote.svg Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
Please also review the Global rename policy.
Stewards
When you give someone global rename rights, please list them on Users with global rename access.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable. If you previously requested that right, please add a link to the previous discussion(s).
=== Global rename for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- don't change this line -->
 |domain    = meta.wikimedia <!-- don't change this line -->
 |user name = Username
}}
<!-- for users not bureaucrats as of 31 August 2014 -->
:''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+2 week}} UTC''
<!-- or for bureaucrats as of 31 August 2014-->
:''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+1 day}} UTC''

If you are not an existing bureaucrat (as of 31 August 2014), the request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than two weeks (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.

If you are a bureaucrat (as of 31 August 2014) and have experience with renames, your request will be reviewed by the community for a minimum of 24 hours, and can then be expedited by a steward as per Global renamers policy if there is no concern to issue the rights. If there is sufficient concern about issuing the rights, then nominations will run for the full two week period.

Global rename for Vogone[edit]

Not ending before 2 September 2014 00:00 UTC
  • Support Support --Rschen7754 00:03, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support Ajraddatz (talk) 00:14, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose as this candidacy would qualify under the proposed policy for speedy approval in 24 hours without objections, hence not allowing anybody but a few meta insiders to comment, I have to formally oppose the candidature so that at the very list the full three days of evaluation have to run and those who do not daily monitor meta have a chance to voice their opinions and concerns, if any. This is nothing against the candidate personally, but I'm sure they would agree with me that 24 hours is not an appropriate time period for a global right. Snowolf How can I help? 00:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
And why didn't you raise your concerns when this was proposed and you became aware of it? Sorry, you're not just undermining this consensus but are also stultifying the users who worked on reaching it. This oppose is no valid objection as per global renamers and should be ignored. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 00:29, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Global rename for rxy[edit]

Not ending before 2 September 2014 00:01 UTC

Hello all. I'd like to application for global renamer right. I'm bureaucrat of Japanese Wikipedia since 6 Aug 2012. I renamed 144 accounts as per local renaming policy and request from 12 Aug 2012 through 31 Jul 2013. if I have a global renamer right, I'll be rename users as per request mainly from japanese users, when that request are clearly based on policy.--Rxy (talk) 00:01, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Support Support --Rschen7754 00:03, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support Ajraddatz (talk) 00:15, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose as this candidacy would qualify under the proposed policy for speedy approval in 24 hours without objections, hence not allowing anybody but a few meta insiders to comment, I have to formally oppose the candidature so that at the very list the full three days of evaluation have to run and those who do not daily monitor meta have a chance to voice their opinions and concerns, if any. This is nothing against the candidate personally, but I'm sure they would agree with me that 24 hours is not an appropriate time period for a global right. Snowolf How can I help? 00:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
    See one above. —DerHexer (Talk) 09:20, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • No objection.DerHexer (Talk) 01:19, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support --W.CC (talk) 03:35, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support Alan (talk) 09:54, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • OK. --Glaisher (talk) 11:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Global rename for Mahitgar[edit]

Not ending before 2 September 2014 02:47 UTC

Hi, I am beurocrat from mr wikipedia. (This is log about change of name activity done by me on local mr wikipedia uptil now). We do have some local technical renaming concerns for Devnagari Script which I have discussed with User_talk:Keegan_(WMF) and I suppose I would need to support username change requirements and requests coming from Devnagri script using wiki's namely Marathi, Hindi etc wikis.

Mahitgar (He who knows ,wants to know and and loves to keep others informed) (talk) 02:47, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

  • I have two questions for you: 1) You mention helping on Marathi and Hindi wikis; do you plan on fulfilling other rename requests? 2) In a recent comment you have made on Meta, you wrote: "all mr-wiki project indiepandance be vehemently defended and not compromised at all costs and independance retained in favour of Marathi people only for ever." [1] Do you think that this will affect your candidacy and/or how you will use the right? --Rschen7754 03:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Good questions
1.1) I said primarily to concentrate on Devnagri script language wikis and as such list goes beyond Marathi and Hindi to say bhojpuri nepali and more are there but bigger projects are no doubt Hindi and Marathi so I mentioned those names.
1.2) It not that we may not work for other requests at all but naturally including me most of beurocrats focus and concern is likely to remain to serve their own communities first, and secondlly including me for most of beurocrats from local language wikis we are busy in lot of other work in local wikis to do. We are here to take care of the load wherever and whenever possible and needed and will try to be assisting positively in the process whatever meta has adopted.
2.1) Including me most of local beurocrats will be representing and taking care of their own communities that does not mean we will be unfair to the others. As far as mr-community is concerned even for roman script usually a Marathi persons account naming would be unique and different and not much likely to go into conflict with another user name. And even if it goes in conflict some where we would be guiding marathi language users to use Devnagri script names rather than wasting their time over roman script user names. And if we are not much likely to go in conflict with roman script names issues then why rest of i.e. non-Devnagri script meta community need to worry about our actions.
2.2) As far as Devanagri script names are concened I have already mentioned that we will be consulting among ourselves and place mutually agreeable policy. I am sysop on one of Hindi projects, I was sysop beirfly for Sanskrit language project I know sysops well from nepali language projects and I do have a good enough understanding to find a common policy with them as far as Devanagri names are concerned.
2.3) As far as defending indipendance of project is concerned we do stand by that does not mean we are anarchyst in any way, If any such thought is in any body's mind they need to revisit their thoughts. As far we oursevels are concerned our thoughts and actions are transperant clear and well within spirit of wikimedia principles. From Marathi Wikipedias side I recently co-operated with Nemo, as Hindi wiktionary sysop I cooperated with you as per Hindi communities wishes. I am an editor on english wikipedia also when I will be representing english wikipedia I will be taking into account english wikipedia' community's views in account.
If this global renaming process at any point of time unduly interfers local aspects and remains unfair against wikimedia spirit certainly I would be the first person to point it out and defend local project independance very well. But according to me most probably in wiki projects user names are not that important also to waste time on unncessary conflicts.
Let it put me again as far as Devanagri script wikis I am capable to co-ordinate and resolve policy issues among ourselves. And we have no reasons to get in conflict waste our time with other language script wikis.
And still by opting Global renamer ship I have to surrender our project indipendance or any body feels I will aquire some other projects indipendance that moment I will not remain interested in this task. Am I clear enough ?
Thanks and regards
Mahitgar (He who knows ,wants to know and and loves to keep others informed) (talk) 06:34, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Global rename for W.CC[edit]

Not ending before 2 September 2014 03:35 UTC

Hello.I'm bureaucrat of Japanese Wikipedia since 27 August 2011. I had commented and adviced to local users as bureaucrat in local request page.(but the logs I used renamer right does not exist.) Since I am a native speaker of Japanese, I can rename easily not only alphabet name but also Japanese characters and Chinese characters name. Of course, I'll follow strictly Global rename policy.--W.CC (talk) 03:35, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Language skills are good; however, do you have any experience renaming users or handling rename requests? Ajraddatz (talk) 03:40, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
    • As a local bureaucrat, I had adviced to local users or rejected their requests in the local request pages. for example [2], [3], [4], [5] and so on.--W.CC (talk) 07:12, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Oppose Oppose Without any rename experience I cannot support your candidacy, sorry. —DerHexer (Talk) 08:56, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Please note jawiki quite early started to give away responsibility for renamings to the stewards. This might incdicate the raw number of renames are not a good measure. Regarding the candidate, he clearly seems to have dealt with the process and apparently is also familiar with cases where a rename should not be done. So no concern from my side. Vogone (talk) 09:03, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Neutral Neutral Alan (talk) 09:56, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • OK. --Glaisher (talk) 11:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Global rename for 99of9[edit]

Not ending before 4 September 2014 04:46 UTC
  • I've been a bureaucrat on Commons for 2.5 years, and have significant renaming experience. Commons is multilingual, so I can deal with that, but I still struggle with right-to-left languages, so will probably not get involved in renames of that type. I have familiarized myself with the Global rename policy. To allay Snowolf's concerns above I have adjusted this candidature to 3 days because I am not in a rush. --99of9 (talk) 04:46, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support --Rschen7754 04:47, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support Ajraddatz (talk) 04:50, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • For the special nomination period I only support crats with at least 100 renames experience and will be neutral for the rest. —DerHexer (Talk) 09:10, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • support --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:19, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support Alan (talk) 09:57, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • OK. --Glaisher (talk) 11:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Global rename for 28bytes[edit]

Not ending before 4 September 2014 05:15 UTC
  • I am an English Wikipedia bureaucrat and I have performed about 500 renames there. I would like to continue to help out with renaming as a global renamer. I have read and understand the Global rename policy. Thank you, 28bytes (talk) 05:15, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support --Rschen7754 05:28, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support Ajraddatz (talk) 05:31, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • No objection.DerHexer (Talk) 08:56, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support Alan (talk) 09:58, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Global rename for Mskyrider[edit]

Not ending before 2 September 2014 05:17 UTC

I've been a bureaucrat @ Turkish Wikipedia since 2007 and have a significant experience in renaming users. Other than my native Turkish, I speak English and French fluently and have basic understanding of Turkic languages. I would like to apply for global renamer rights in order to be able to process primarily requests coming from my home wiki. Thanks. --Mskyrider (talk) 05:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Global rename for Itti[edit]

Not ending before 2 September 2014 06:29 UTC

Moin, I would like to apply for the global renamer rights. I´m bureaucrat on german Wikipedia. Since 2013 I renamed 151 User . --Itti (talk) 06:28, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Global rename for Esprit Fugace[edit]

Not ending before 2 September 2014 07:13 UTC

Hi, I've been a bureaucrat on fr.wp since 2007. I've renamed over 400 users, and I'd like to continue as a global renamer. Thanks for your time, Esprit Fugace (talk) 07:13, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

  • No objection.DerHexer (Talk) 09:02, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support Alan (talk) 10:19, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Support, very experienced bureaucrat, fully aware of the "global" perspective. Elfix 10:57, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support Akeron (talk) 10:59, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • OK. --Glaisher (talk) 11:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Global rename for محمد شعیب[edit]

Not ending before 2 September 2014 09:30 UTC

Hi! I am bureaucrat on urdu wikipedia, and have rename experience, so I would like to retain the permission to rename users. Since I am native Urdu speaker, I can easily rename Arabic alphabet names such as Urdu, Arabic and Persian. Thanks for your consideration Muhammad Shuaib (talk) 09:30, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

  • For the special nomination period I only support crats with at least 100 renames experience and will be neutral for the rest. —DerHexer (Talk) 09:37, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Global rename for Ejs-80[edit]

Not ending before 2 September 2014 11:10 UTC

Ị have been a bureaucrat on fiwiki since April 2010 and performed 246 renames in total. One user encouraged me to apply for the global renamer right, so that we would have at least one global renamer who can speak Finnish. Besides Finnish and English, I can read Swedish. I also studied German in school, but I’ve forgotten almost all of it by now. –Ejs-80 11:10, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

  • OK. --Glaisher (talk) 11:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support Alan (talk) 11:22, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Global rename for APPER[edit]

Not ending before 2 September 2014 11:12 UTC

Hi. I'm a bureaucrat at de.wikipedia since january 2009. I did 740 renames in this time, since 2012 386 renames. I would like to support german speaking users (who maybe are overstrained by meta), but also to do other renames. --APPER (talk) 11:12, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Global rename for Ladsgroup[edit]

Not ending before 2 September 2014 11:19 UTC

Hello, I've been an active bureaucrat in Persian Wikipedia since September 12, 2010 (about four years now) and I renamed 179 users, about 36% of all renames and more than any other bureaucrat in that Wiki. My main concern for this request is non-Latin user names and abuses that It may cause because of similarities, I explained in more details in here but If I want to explain very fast. "وحید" and "وحيد" look exactly the same but they are different (just remove د character to see the differences) and I think a bureaucrat who knows these languages (Arabic and Persian scripts) is vital for global rename team. Amir (talk) 11:19, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Global rename for Samat[edit]

Not ending before 2 September 2014 11:24 UTC

Hi! I am one of the most active bureaucrats on the Hungarian Wikipedia since 2008 and trusted user in other projects. I don't have more than 100 renames, but on the Hungarian Wikipedia nobody has it. I am familiar with the guidelines and if I don't know something I ask first. I would like to help you out concerning the Hungarian language community members, as many of them don't speak English. Best regards, Samat (talk) 11:24, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Requests for other global permissions[edit]

Symbol comment vote.svg Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting additional global permissions, make sure that:

  1. You have a global account;
  2. You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
  3. No specific section on this page exists for the permission you want to request;
To request additional global permissions
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain what kind of access you need and why. If needed, link to relevant discussions. If you hold, or have previously held, the right and are asking for either a renewal or revival of that right, please add a link to the previous discussion.
=== <Add requested permission here> for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
 |user name = 
 |discussion=
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~

The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a short period of consideration. A steward will review the request.

Global deletion for Pathoschild (temporary)[edit]

The global delete flag would only be used by Synchbot to delete users' *.js and *.css pages (by request) for the migration to the global CSS/JS extension. Synchbot was routinely used for similar deletions before I resigned my steward flag, so it can handle any case not supported by the existing migration script. (With global CSS/JS finally deployed, many users are left with hundreds of redundant JavaScript subpages crosswiki; this leads to strange quirks like scripts loading twice. I'll contact these users to offer to fix this with Synchbot.) —Pathoschild 03:37, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Group doesn't yet exist, but I strongly Support Support the request in order to help legoktm with the delete work load. - Hoo man (talk) 03:43, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Support per hoo. —DerHexer (Talk) 08:57, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
  • 1. If successful (which I don't doubt), GS rights should be given for simplicity, instead of creating a new group for one-time-use. 2. Isn't GlobalCssJs a sufficient script? --MF-W 08:59, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
    Pff, I forgot GS is not truly global. Let's give steward rights instead! :P --MF-W 21:27, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
    Unfortunately the GlobalCssJs migration script only handles one very specific case. It's essentially a nuclear option — it can delete every page matching its criteria, but it can't do anything more nuanced (skip some wikis, edit global.js out of pages full of other scripts, handle non-Meta global.js, etc). There several users already excluded. I think the two approaches would work in parallel: the GlobalCssJs migration script would handle the most common case, and synchbot would take care of all the cases the migration script doesn't handle. —Pathoschild 14:40, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
    Hm, and enhancing that script by adding synchbot features and letting you run it would be impossible? Vogone (talk) 17:01, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
    That would work, but it'd involve server script access and additional development time. That doesn't seem necessary when the existing Synchbot can do it just fine, which has the added benefit of reducing Legoktm's workload. —Pathoschild 19:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
  • I support global sysop rights for the bot. (Id est, opposing the new group Glob-del). There is no need to create a special group, there are already so many groups. --Pxos (talk) 12:57, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
    @Pxos: Global sysop rights are limited to a subset of wikis (most small wikis are included), whereas the "global deletion" group would not be. The global group could be de facto deleted (have all rights removed) when done. PiRSquared17 (talk) 13:01, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
    Thanks for the info! I will change my opinion into "support global deletion". --Pxos (talk) 13:07, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
  • PiRSquared17 (talk) Support 13:01, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Support I have a lot of *.js and *.css on some wikis that migration script will not handle, so... --- @lestaty discuţie 15:11, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support Trijnsteltalk 16:18, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support - Of course! Very helpful user who is trusted. I see no issues. -Barras talk 17:07, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support Helder 17:21, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support --Kolega2357 (talk) 17:33, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support per Hoo :) Legoktm (talk) 18:45, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support QuiteUnusual (talk) 20:02, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support --Stryn (talk) 20:36, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support Quiddity (talk) 21:57, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support Jianhui67 talkcontribs 11:07, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support by all means Pundit (talk) 11:50, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support Sure! --Wiki13 talk 13:53, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Sì, --M/ (talk) 14:15, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment Comment No objection, just curious why this is going to be a nobrainer while similar cases like Steward requests/Global permissions/2013-06#Global editinterface for Addbot (archive link) got the full piece of drama for less rights requested. Will the local communities, especially those who opted out from Global Sysops, at least be informed before this new global group is installed? --Krd 14:27, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
    Less rights isn't true, we have exactly one here. And this user was entrusted by the global community to hold all rights on all wikis (former steward), but resigned these recently under uncontroversial circumstances. This is also why this request became a no-brainer for most, I believe, as Pathoschild merely requests to resume a task he previously did as a steward. Vogone (talk) 14:35, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
    I would also add that while the right is not restricted, the deletions will be of pages identified by the target user in their user space.  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:05, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support Temporary Steward? Alan (talk) 19:50, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
    No way. While Pathoschild is certainly still trustworthy enough for it, it would make much more sense to just create a new global group with a few rights. Those rights would be 'delete', maybe 'edit' etc. if still required for deletions, but he has 'editinterface' already anyway. It would be completely out-of-process to allow him to do basically anything on any wiki (including OS and CU). Creating a global group is just a few clicks for a steward anyway. PiRSquared17 (talk) 16:51, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
    I know mate. It was a way of expressing my support. Alan (talk) 22:58, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support--Calak (talk) 23:46, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support for up to one year for the limited scope explained of user js/css files where requested, and the assignation of the permission then to be reviewed. The user already has editinterface, and therefore can already edit the identified files, so is then looking for the ability to clean up files as requested by users with an existing tool provided by user (when a steward). Trusted user has been addressed by Vogone, and is not in question.  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:00, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Support Support Why not? -FASTILY 03:21, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment Comment I think "GlobalCssJs migration script" was developed for this task, and already active. Samat (talk) 17:16, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
    • @Samat: That script handles very specific cases and Synchbot can handle other cases not supported by that script. See nom. --Glaisher (talk) 17:19, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
    • OK, thank you for your explanation. :) Samat (talk) 17:21, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

See also[edit]