Willkommen bei Meta!
Meta-Wiki ist die mehrsprachige Webseite über alle Wikimediaprojekte, weshalb auf Meta nicht nur englische sondern auch deutsche Dokumente liegen.
Der Inhalt von Meta verteilt sich auf vier Kategorien: Diskussionen über die Wikimediaprojekte, Veröffentlichungen der persönlichen Essays, Internationale Koordination besonders Übersetzungen und Entwicklung der MediaWikisoftware. Weitere Informationen: Meta:About (en).
Hier sind einige nützliche Links:
- Hauptseiten: de - en
- Neuigkeiten: en
- Übersetzungsanträge: de - en
- Meta:Babel: "Ich brauche Hilfe" auf Meta für alle Sprachen.
- Translator's noticeboard: Portal für Übersetzung, bekannt mit Nebenname, Babylon
- Categories: Liste der Hauptkategorien auf Meta
IRC cloak request confirmation 
My username on meta and de: is "Hoch auf einem Baum", my master IRC nickname is HochaufeinemBaum, and I would like the cloak wikipedia/HaeB. regards, Hoch auf einem Baum 05:03, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi Haeb, I did the categorization as part of general maintenance related tasks along with several hundred other pages(approx. 500), I found all the pages listed under Uncategorized pages needing categorization. Global message delivery's main pages, had been categorized as "Global Maintenance" by user:Pathoschild much earlier, I just used his categorization for the rest of the pages under it, its wasn't my decision to categorize it under that. If there are any issues please feel free to revert my edit, I will remove that categorization from those pages for now. Sorry for any inconvenience, Regards. Theo10011 17:25, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
For fixing the date typos :) guillom 19:49, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
May 16 Signpost global delivery 
Hi. I imagine you're already aware, but just in case... this delivery had spaces before some of the bullets, causing funky rendering when the message delivered (for example). --MZMcBride 14:50, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I noticed :(
- I wrote up an
excuseexplanation for what happened here.
- Regards, HaeB 22:07, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
August 30 Signpost global delivery 
Hi. I imagine you're already aware, but just in case...
I don't think the bot has been programmed to do the global delivery yet. Or something. --MZMcBride 04:34, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Global message delivery answers 
Hi. I looked into your Global message delivery troubles.
Regarding this edit, the bot checks the last editor to both the /Spam and /Status subpages against the /Access list before running. It does so to ensure that no nefarious user has vandalized the /Spam page between the message being loaded and the bot being started. In this case, I believe due to replag, the bot thought that the most recent editor was The ed17 (due to this edit by him). The ed17 is not on the bot's access list currently (he should probably be added!).
Regarding the bot not starting after you commanded it to most recently, it was due to this error in your message.
- Thanks for sorting this out! I believe "your" is used in the second person plural, but note that I wasn't involved with posting the stalled Signpost message originally - I just thought it would be nice to help getting it out before I was going to overwrite it with out the subsequent message.
- "this error" - thanks a lot for the explanation! Are there any other aspects in which the bot's parsing of this tag differs from MediaWiki's? Would it be an idea to handle this kind of error like others, with the bost posting a note to the Status page instead of aborting silently?
- Again, thanks a lot for your help, and your work on the bot is much appreciated, as always.
- Regards, HaeB (talk) 03:16, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, I meant "your" in the sense that you were the one who reported the issues to me.
- The </source> tag being on its own line isn't really a parsing issue, per se. The bot looks at the /Spam page and it relies on certain strings of text being present (such as "SUBJECT", etc.) and being in a particular format. When that text isn't present or it's in an unexpected format, the bot goes ape-shit. I guess catching this a bit more gracefully would be nice. It'd be nicer if people just didn't screw up the format, though. ;-) --MZMcBride (talk) 17:28, 10 September 2012 (UTC)