Wikivoyage/Logo/2013/R1/v/WV logo v25 v2.png: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Older edit Newer edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 07:00, 28 July 2013

Wikivoyage Logo

Election 2013

Background • FAQ • Translate • Results

File:WV logo v25 v2.png

Pilettes: Compass Rose with Globe - My logo proposal slightly changed from the version made by Digr, WV logo v25 v2.png

Instructions

Any contributor registered on any Wikimedia Foundation project prior to May 31, 2013 is eligible to vote. The process will be using weighted voting to ensure fair representation to Wikivoyage contributors. Wikivoyage contributors include anyone who has made 50 mainspace edits to Wikivoyage prior to May 31, 2013.

If you vote for more than one logo, please vote for them in order of your preference. The first one you choose is your first choice; the second one, your second choice, and the third one is your third choice. Your votes will be tallied in that order.

This is not a secret ballot. Your choices are recorded in your contributions and are consequently publicly visible.

Only votes by logged-in users are accepted.
One vote per logo. Three votes in total.
To vote manually, append the following text at the end:
```
# [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|]]
```

Comments [edit]

The following conversation is taken from Wikivoyage/Logo 2013/Submissions#Option 11 - Compass Rose with Globe:

I liked this one too. ℳono 05:06, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I liked it (second one). Alex Spade (talk) 12:21, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Alex: the second one is better. --Andyrom75 (talk) 12:44, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I like version 0.4a.--Patafisik (talk) 15:11, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

While I like this a lot when considered independently, I think it's (much) too similar to the Meta logo. While that doesn't present trademark issues, since the WMF would own both, it still fails to give our project a unique look. (Actually, given Wikivoyage's greater visibility than Meta, it might be better to say that we'd be robbing Meta of its unique look!) At a minimum, I think the globe element would need to be completely rethought. The compass element in 0.4a is really nice, though. --Peter ^Talk 20:19, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I like Version 0.4a even if it is similar to the Meta log: Meta's looks concentrating and stable, this one moving outward dynamically.--miya (talk) 05:08, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Second one really elegant. Jon Davies (WMUK) (talk) 07:51, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have said, I liked it (0.4a), but image must be cleared (see full size on image description page). Alex Spade (talk) 22:40, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Version 0.2 delete. We can change Globe. Digr (talk) 19:14, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I like this one. --Alex rollin (talk) 18:26, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I like it . good work.Kbda3200

Though it looks good, in fact it is totally generic and uninspiring. As a creative community we should be able to do far better than this. Pratyeka (talk) 03:54, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 # [[User:Biologo32|Biologo32]]
 # [[User:Teles|Teles]]
+# [[User:Doedoejohn|Doedoejohn]]