User talk:Teles

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Teles was here
"Look up to the sky. You'll never find rainbows if you're looking down." --C.C.
This talk page was last vandalized edited 10816 minutes ago by Mykola7T / C and has 56 kb. Leave your message at the bottom and sign it with ~~~~. I will answer here in a minute or a bit more.

At this moment, the protection level of this page allows any type of user to edit. In case you can't edit here, see other ways of reaching me.
Single rule: be civil and speak your mind. I usually don't leave respectful messages without answer.

AirVPN proxy block[edit]

Hi there,

I'm a user from Germany and I'm not able to contribute to de.wikipedia because of a blocked IP range (mine in the moment is and the blocked range according to Wikipedia is I want this range, and, in fact, all AirVPN's IP ranges, unblocked at least for all users who are logged in. I can't see the reason why everyone who is being privacy- and security-orientated and therefore using a VPN for their connection should be locked out of editing even if they are logged in ... Thanks for your time and efforts, -- Marilyn.hanson (talk) 02:24, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[]

Forgot to say: It's a paid VPN, if it's of relevance ... in the blocking notification, it was stated that you entered as reason for the blocking: "Open proxy" ... -- Marilyn.hanson (talk) 02:26, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[]
@Marilyn.hanson: Hi! There is currently no global block for this IP or range. If you are still having problems to edit this may be due to one of the local blocks applied on a few projects. It’s not blocked on de.wikipedia, so this won’t be a problem there. Please, tell me if you need anything else. Regards.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 03:07, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[]
thanks for your answer! Unfortunately, today I tried again editing an de.wikipedia while logged in on Wikipedia and using AirVPN and got a very similar blocking notification (in German):
"Du bist aus dem folgenden Grund nicht berechtigt, die Seite zu bearbeiten:
Deine IP-Adresse befindet sich in einem Bereich, der auf allen Wikis gesperrt ist.
Die Sperre wurde durchgeführt von Vituzzu ( Der angegebene Grund ist hosting service with open proxies such as
Beginn der Sperre: 16:25, 25. Apr. 2018
Ablauf der Sperre: 16:25, 25. Apr. 2023
Du kannst Vituzzu kontaktieren, um die Sperre zu diskutieren. Du kannst nicht die Funktion „E-Mail an diesen Benutzer“ benutzen, bis du eine gültige E-Mail-Adresse in deinen Benutzerkonteneinstellungen angegeben hast und du nicht daran gehindert wirst, diese Funktion zu verwenden. Deine aktuelle IP-Adresse ist und der gesperrte Bereich ist Bitte beziehe alle obigen Einzelheiten in all deinen Anfragen ein."
So, I think the problem still persists, although I can't reproduce it exactly because of not knowing how to force AirVPN to get the same IP again (if this is possible at all). Just wanted to let you know, and thanks again, -- Marilyn.hanson (talk) 00:13, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[]

Wiki Project Medicine Foundation Membership[edit]

Membership renewal

Dear Wiki Project Med Supporter, you are receiving this message as you have shown interest in supporting Wiki Project Med in the past. As our organization grows and evolves, we want to be able to verify peoples ongoing interest in being involved. To that end, the board has decided to require renew of membership every two years. So -- whether you are a current member or not, please fill out our updated membership form, to ensure your membership till the end of 2020. Please note -- We ask that you fill out the form by Feb 3rd, as we are close to elections and only members can nominate themselves for the board and vote!

Best, Shani & Doc James. 01:57, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[]

@Esh77 and Doc James: Hi! I have signed it since your announcement on Facebook. Is there a way to confirm that I have done anything correctly? I can do it again in case of need. Regards.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 01:56, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[]
User:Esh77 will be able to tell you :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[]

Check this page's information[edit]

If you compare the information noting the ID. Then comparing this edit, and the comment in the overarching filter, which I hope is okay with you. I not, please give me a ping, and I will revert.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:07, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[]

@Billinghurst: It's fine! Thanks for telling me!—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 01:54, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[]

Translation correctness[edit]

Hi Teles. Do you think "administradores" is right for CNBanner:Stewvote-text1/pt? I am not sure ptwiki uses this word to refer to our group. CNBanner:Stewvote-text1/pt-br uses "stewards" though. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 20:56, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[]

@MarcoAurelio: Not really! “Administradores” is a translation for “sysops” or “administrators”. The proper translation is... none. We use the word “stewards”.
Just out of curiosity, we actually voted years ago to decide what should be the translation and decided that it should remain untranslated.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:41, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[]


see this thread; concerned with the Ombudsman Commission. Your opinion is solicited:-) Winged Blades of Godric (talk) 14:18, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[]

Hello, Winged Blades of Godric. Thanks for the note.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 13:21, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[]
Welcome, can you say something over there? A lack of activity reports, (responding to calls for it after 12 days and preparing that for over a fortnight), sitting on a complaint for months (as it seem to be), not acknowledging other complaints........The activities of the last year's committee don't instill any confidence to a lot many. I will urge you to coordinate with the outgoing members to issue a joint-statement about the barrage of criticism that has been leveled at your (plural) activities, from multiple long-standing users.Winged Blades of Godric (talk) 13:28, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[]
@Winged Blades of Godric: I understand the concerns and totally agree that OC should have been more responsive. I assure you that this is something that most (if not all) members of OC are aware and willing to address for the next term. Even though I have my opinion, I am not sure if individual statements would help too much. I don't want to run the risk of saying something that doesn't express the opinion of the commission. We are identifying our internal problems has been a while and working on them with WMF in order to better respond to community needs. If community demands an explanation about OC activity, I believe it should receive one.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 14:08, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[]
I'm glad to hear that. Again, thanks. In light of the statements by multiple respected users, as to the OC-activities of last year, I believe that the outgoing committee has a responsibility to make us aware about what caused their activity rates to take a downward plunge and other aspects......Winged Blades of Godric (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[]
  • Also, a quick count reveals that there ought be 2 cases pending from 2017, which is yet to be resolved. Is that true? Winged Blades of Godric (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[]
  • I was looking at the report-archives and the OC seemed to have been pretty efficient until 2017; where it started slacking; probably due to an increased volume of cases. It again made up in the second half of 2017. The first half of 2018 was quite good before the second half went haywire. Why? Winged Blades of Godric (talk) 14:34, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[]
(ed. confl.) @Winged Blades of Godric: We have never mentioned contribution or participation of individual users on reports. However, I am open to suggestions. How do you suggest we to report that? You may want to open the discussion about the reports on other spaces, so we can take the suggestions to OC members and WMF to see how we can improve them without violating privacy policy of course.
There were 2 cases of 2017 to be solved, but they were closed on second semester of 2018. Nothing pending from 2017.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 14:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[]
Let's make a rolling count. 2017, 1st half, is the start-span and we are bothered about cases received in 2017 only (we are not concerned about cases received in 2015 or 2016 or 2018) and when they get solved.
You received 21 cases in 2017 1st half, of which 8 were pending. We move to 2nd half, 2017. You received 15 fresh cases; of which 5 were pending. You also resolved the 8 from the previous half. So net pending = 5 only. We move to 2018 1st half. You close 2 cases from 2017. So, you have 3 pending in hand. We move to 2018 2nd half. No case from 2017 were closed.
So, we still have 3 pending cases from 2017 in hand and your reports does not mention them closed. What am I missing? Winged Blades of Godric (talk) 14:48, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[]
Now, you mention closing 2 cases from 2017 during 2018 2nd sem (which will do some minimal justice to the activity-levels). But why does the corresponding report fails to mention any stuff about 2017? Also, that still leaves one case from 2017 as unsolved, yet. Winged Blades of Godric (talk) 14:50, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[]
  • Can you give a table that mentions the number of cases that were recieved in each month (starting 2017 1st sem) and when did they got solved? For example (hypothetical):- Cases A, B and C were reported in 2017 Jan. A was solved in Feb 2017. B in Nov 2017 and C in May 2018. Cases D and E were reported in Feb. Both were solved in April 2017. And, go on like that.......
  • You need not mention about which wiki the request originated from or any allied stuff and I don't see about any remote breach of privacy policy. We can have a far better idea about response-time from your end. Winged Blades of Godric (talk) 07:21, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[]
  • Also, given that Billinghurst was inactive for the latter semester; why wasn't KRD pulled into being an active member from being an advisor? Winged Blades of Godric (talk) 07:30, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[]
@Winged Blades of Godric: There is no open case from 2017. I will double triple check the table to see if there is something wrong with it. I will send these concerns to other members. If that is a demand of broad community, it’s my opinion that OC should prepare a report about what happened last year and how we are organizing ourselves to avoid any possible issue. Last year was my first one as an OC member and I am far from considering myself experienced on that position, so I am not comfortable to talk about without checking with others. We have to be careful for not exposing cases too much. I have to remind you that there is usually a low level of activity on the group. Exposing too much may be harmful if any private information becomes identifiable somehow (correlation with public dates or actions...).—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 17:34, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[]
Well, let's see whether this is a demand of broad community:-
I've sent the Commission an email requesting clarity and a public statement, if possible.-Steward Arjaddatz writes over en-wiki about the OC's making any statement over Alex's alleged abuse of tools.
I've also made an onwiki inquiry on Meta.I agree a public statement from the OC and/or WMF would be appropriate.-Ex--steward and en-wiki sysop Rschen554 raises the same query about whether the OC has got anything to say over Alex's case.
Katie, an en-wiki arbitrator (and a co-signatory to the OC-complaint) notes that the case request was filed in August'18 and that they have not updated us on the status of the investigation nor have they given us a time frame for completion.
Rschen writes that It is disturbing that they have not given an update in several months. I think that is completely unacceptable on their end. I have started a more pointed inquiry on Meta
SQL, another en-wiki admin notes This is not a surprise to me. I made a report back in November to the OC, and had to ask in December if it had even been received. I still have not heard back since the acknowledgement.
TRM, an ex-admin and bureaucrat notes that Ombudsmen usually issue statements about significant cases, rather than stay silent (perpetually). This would be a good opportunity for the "Ombudsman" to speak to the community.
Drmies, an admin and ex-arb agrees with TRM and wishes that the Ombudsman/woman/men would be more present. He provides some evidence about the fact that the OC did work; at-least in the far past.
TRM brands the OC to be a mythical creature and notes that if the "Ombudsman" has any substance (indeed, I'm not even clear if they exist, I have my own concerns [see below] which may need to be addressed, but I doubt this "Ombudsman" even has any credence), then they will release a statement and cover this issue properly.
Beeblebrox, an ex-arbitrator and sysop notes that I can also see the source of TRM's skepticism as apparently the OC forgot to tell anyone what they'd been up to for the entirety of last year. Now that all this is going down they are "working on it".
Arjaddatz agrees that the OC lacks responsiveness.
Rschen notes that from what I've seen (both onwiki and during my steward term) they don't seem to be responsive, and when they are responsive they sometimes make some odd pronouncements. I remember that a large number of CUs/stewards on checkuser-l sharply disagreed with the findings of one case that happened when I was on the list.
Beeblebrox notes that they usually at least issue activity reports every six months, which they have failed to do at all for 2018. These reports are very basic and I can't see how, given their usual caseload, it would take more than hour to get them done, yet despite repeated requests for them they've not been done.
BuRob13; a sysop and a current arbitrator agrees with Beeblebrox's above comments and notes it to be a substantial problem.
Galahad, a newly inducted OC member writes I can only say that the commission is still investigating this case. Per the change of members, the case take more time for resolution.
Arjaddatz wonders about why the previous group didn't respond within five months.
Beeblebrox mentions about Galahad's comment sounding like the previous group've done nothing and left it for the new guys. He remarks it to be not encouraging.
Beblebrox further goes on to write about the important questions (that) are raised by this situation, like is it normal for issues to take six months to be dealt with, is the staff aware of these long delays.
You post the activity report over Meta.
Rschen writes that the activity report for the second half of 2018 was just released, and it is quite concerning:Only 2 cases were closed, and 12 cases are still open. What happened?
Thryduulf, an ex-arb and an admin raises a question about the statistics over the OC-report t/p.
Swarm, an admin writes that These revelations about the apparent ineffectiveness of the OC are arguably more concerning than Alex's violations! It looks like TRM's statements about the commission not even existing are not simply exaggerated rhetoric.
Opabinia Regalis, a sitting arb, writes over ARC that I do feel like a bit of a chump now for having said at the time that surely the ombudsmen wouldn't take too long....
Rschen writes over ARC that the OC really dropped the ball here.
Add to the above long list, me.
Pray tell me; how many more requests would assist you (and other members) in understanding the bare-bones fact that the community is hardly any satisfied with your last year's performance-card?
You seem to be pretty sure about no case, being open from 2017 but the data ton't tally. That means we are hardly able to trust on your reports either which does not bear any well for a body, suffering from a trust-deficit.
I understand that there are privacy and confidentiality implications but I don't see about how they are remotely affected by the statistics that I seek. Obviously, I also understand that it's your second year at the committee and the derived conservative-ness but accountability is a core value; that can't be afforded to be spared with.
And, I thus hope that you play an active role in engaging with fellow members to issue a meaningful joint-statement about what happened last year and what did you learn from it.
Also, please answer my questions about Billinghurst being not substituted by KRD. I also note in passing that an ex-member has noted that some members were perpetually inactive and that the group-dynamics nearly collapsed. Winged Blades of Godric (talk) 08:47, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[]
@Winged Blades of Godric: I am not sure if I can or should answer all of your questions. What I can say is that - more than anyone - OC members know that the whole group needs to improve and we are working on it. I have a large respect for those that left and once helped the group to work and build its procedures. I won't run the risk of saying anything to damage their image or throw an user to the lions. OC members are not chosen by community and those that are responsible for chosing them are aware of who is active or not. So, I don't think it is helpful to come out with names. I will send the complaints to the group and WMF. Thank you for caring and helping us to improve.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 00:46, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[]

The OC is a pretty important role. By practically refusing to investigate cases you're pretty much sending the message to all CUs that they can set their own rules and ignore the privacy policy (and we both know that there are some wikis that have very little oversight of CU). Is this the message that you want to send? --Rschen7754 23:39, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[]

@Rschen7754: Not really. We are pretty much aware of the problems and I have no doubt they will be fixed shortly. I don't talk on behalf of OC, but it is safe to say that everyone is interested on improving our work. Community can still trust the commission to help with what they need from it.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 00:46, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[]
Thanks, and apologies if that came off too harsh. I just know that if I was on an OC that wasn't closing cases, I wouldn't have slept very well at night. --Rschen7754 08:05, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[]

Wikimedia and Libraries User Group Steering Committee Election Voting Phase[edit]

Wikimedia and Libraries User Group logo.svg

Hello Teles! We are happy to announce that the steering committee election 2019 is now open for voting. Because you have joined the user group before 28 February 2019, you are eligible to vote. Not unlike last year, you can vote support for multiple candidates, at most one support for each candidate. Also, oppose votes are not allowed, but discussions are welcome on the talk page.

On behalf of the steering committee,


via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:43, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[]

Elections for 5 seats on the board of WPMEDF & Annual Meeting[edit]

Dear WikiProject Medicine member, the election for 5 seats on the board is underway and voting is now open till March 24th. We encourage you to use your right to vote by supporting the candidates you prefer HERE. Please also note that on Monday, March 25, between 1900-2000 UTC we will be holding our open annual meeting online. A link will be sent via the mailing list / Facebook group so stay tuned. We hope you can join us! Best, James & Shani. 14:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[]

Range block[edit]

Hello. I'm (obviously) not on it now, but I did some editing yesterday on en:wiki from ‎2a01:4c8:102c:dda3:9503:10c1:3055:a0a5 then found it was blocked by you along with all of 2A01:4C8:0:0:0:0:0:0/32

I must confess I don't really know how these rangeblocks work, and I can't see what the abuse was that led you to make the block. I assume that it was not my editing since I haven't done anything even faintly illegitimate? Could you please confirm that? It just felt a bit consequential, even if it is not! :)

thanks and regards, 09:39, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[]

Hello! I had to apply this rangeblock yesterday as it was used for clear vandalism. If you didn't do anything wrong, you shouldn't worry about it as they are not related to anything you have done. The block was set to expire soon. In case you face any problem to edit, please feel free to write me here or by email. Regards.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 17:02, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[]
Ah, fine, thanks very much! I see it is already unblocked now, so great. Thanks and best wishes 01:12, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[]

Unlock name. Black list.[edit]

Greetings. Can I unlock a name? In 2013, there was a conflict of interest. The article was added to the text and pictures of the author. The author has mostly esoteric and spiritual themes. Over the years, there have been links to the media. Or do I need to create this in a blacklist discussion? It is possible that in 2013 the articles were more advertising, but over the years everything has changed. Does it make sense for me to create this topic in the blacklist discussions, since Someone may consider that the articles were advertising or was spam? There was a text about the artist, several links, and his work. Here are examples of his work:

Names: Alexander Tatarnikov, DiezelSun.


Hello Teles, I want to talk you abot User:Taamu. He is administrator of Ossetian Wikipedia. Before 2008 Samachablo (South Ossetia) is occupied by Russia, it is territory of Georgia. Two georgian user were talked him about him, but he deleted my edit about maps, and territory of Georgia has Map of ,,South Ossetia. And he said Tskhinvali (city of Georgia) is capital of South Ossetia, help me please! Goodbye!--ჯეო (talk) 08:10, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[]

Template_talk: SWMT-Members[edit]

Hey Teles, As you were previously involved in discussions on Template_talk: SWMT-Members, your input will be really helpful on a recent discussion about making single list of users instead experienced and new. Thank you! ‐‐1997kB (talk) 03:31, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[]

@1997kB: Thanks for inviting. I removed my name from the list in the past for I can't see any usefulness anymore on it. So, whatever discussion exclusively about it, will not lead to any relevant conclusion in my opinion. Separating active from inactive? Experienced from Newbies? Adding any new background color or a nice image? I may be wrong, but I can't see any relevant outcome from that.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 19:19, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[]


Hi! I hope I'm in the right place! I was editing on Wikipedia just then and received a disturbing block message while trying to create an AfD discussion. Can you please help me? I don't understand what's wrong. Many thanks! PK650 (talk) 08:19, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[]

@PK650: Hi! Sorry to know that. Please, try again. I have changed a global block and I assume it will fix the problem.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 13:42, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[]
@Teles: Thank you, it appears to have been fixed. Could you please explain what happened? I also thought registered users were not affected by IP blocks... There still appears to be something amiss, though, as twinkle now doesn't work correctly for me. It does what I ask it to, but it continues to provide the following warning after completion (and the window won't close): "Your deletion rationale is provided below, which you can copy and paste into a new XFD dialog if you wish to try again". Is there any way to fix this? Best, PK650 (talk) 20:59, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[]
@PK650: Someone else was using many IP addresses close to yours for negative actions, and I had to block the range. Thus, you were affected. However, I should had set it only for not logged in users. By mistake, I set it for logged in users too and it ended by affecting also accounts using that range. Sorry about that. Regarding the issue with Twinkle, I don't know the reason or if it is related with that.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 19:11, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[]
I see. Thank you for clearing this up. The other issue has since resolved itself, so it'll remain a mystery! Best, PK650 (talk) 10:04, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[]

Artigo na Wikipédia em Havaiano, sendo constantemente vandalizado por este IP![edit]

Oi Teles, tudo bem, é o seguinte gostaria de saber qual o seu status na página da Wikipédia em Havaiano; se for administrador ou um steward, por favor gostaria que você revertesse a edição feita por este IP acima mencionado, o artigo em havaiano fala de um político do Brasil, e talvez esta pessoa não goste desse político e por isso insiste em vandalizar o artigo em havaiano, revertendo edições na página principal do artigo da qual consta uma foto da personagem Hello Kitty, e informações nada haver com o artigo em português ou mesmo sobre a pessoa biografada. Ficarei grato pela atenção. wu#22222 (talk)

@WikiUser22222: Se encontrar um vandalismo, pode ir revertendo. Caso o outro usuário insista, precisa pedir ajuda a um steward. Eu não sou steward e não poderei ajudar. Também comentei nesta seção.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 14:58, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[]

Hope all is well[edit]

Hi mate. I hope that all is well, that you are staying COVID-free, and the work situation is not unbearable for you. [Finally got around to leaving a message for you when I thought about it, rather than at a time or place when I cannot.]  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:13, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[]

@Billinghurst: hey! I am doing okay! This whole situation affected a lot my career as doctor besides all other social aspects. Sometime before the pandemic was a reality in Brazil, I started working on a intensive care unit. Later, it was isolated to receive only COVID patients. So, everything is new and it’s been a challenge to have new set of experiences. Fortunately, this unit was shut down last week as we don’t have enough COVID patients and it’s not needed anymore. Back to surgery patients!
As for my personal health, I have spondylitis, so I use infliximabe, which reduces my immunity capacity and it was something I had to consider while deciding where to work. However, I have never felt better in my life. Not a single COVID symptom for me or my family. So, despite the social damage this disease is bringing to Brazil (to the world, but specially to Brazil), I don’t think I have tue right to complain.
What about you? I hope everything is fine over there and that it’s been dealt in a better way than here.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 13:48, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[]

A Question[edit]

Okay I'm very sorry, but I just didn't know where to ask. I said I would just contact an admin for help. Where can I send proposals or requests for the Wikimedia Foundation? Gjjixzoh (talk) 22:50, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[]

@Gjjixzoh: Hi. What kind of proposal? I think it depends on what is being requested or proposed.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 02:32, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[]
Oh sorry, That was really stupid. I meant where do I send requests or get help if something happened like Adminship Abuse or vandal spambot accounts? Gjjixzoh (talk) 23:10, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[]
@Gjjixzoh: You need first to ask assistance from the community where these things are happening. It may vary if local community is too small. Tell me what is the community you are referring to, so I can have an idea.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:16, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[]

Community Wishlist Survey 2021: Invitation[edit]

SGrabarczuk (WMF)

18:26, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Community Wishlist Survey 2021[edit]

SGrabarczuk (WMF)

16:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

Hi Teles, I !voted on your election page but have no idea if you got the ping - If not I just wanted to express my gratitude and say thank you for leaving here and treating Covid patients!. It's been in the news how tough it's been in (UK) hospitals and it's obviously been tough everywhere. It's commendable you chose to do what you did it really is.
Thank you for helping others and thank you for putting others first. I hope you're safe and well and I wish you all the best IRL and here. Take care Teles and thank you again. Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[]

Hi, Davey2010! Thank you so much for your message. That made my day Face-smile.svg. Take care yourself too. —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 18:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[]
Hi Teles, You're very welcome, As weird as it sounds your statement really touched me and I just thought it was a lovely and commendable thing for you to do. I don't even know you but I'm genuinely proud of what you've done and I mean that. Anyway many thanks and you take care of yourself too, All the best Teles. –Davey2010Talk 18:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[]

You've got a mail[edit]

NOTE: Email is from account 레비. — regards, Revi 09:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[]

Congratulations for stewardship[edit]

Hello, Teles. Congratulations because you have been re-elected a steward by Wikimedia community. I hope you will do good job. You aren't foreigner for this tool anyway. :) Regards. --Uncitoyentalk 14:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[]

@Uncitoyen: Thanks!! That’s my hope too heh —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 16:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[]

Bloqueio Global[edit]

Olá Teles, tudo bem?

O @Érico: me pediu para enviar uma mensagem a você sobre um pedido de bloqueio global que está acontecendo na Wiki EN a respeito da minha conta, aqui.

Basicamente, fui acusado de Hoax e tive alguns artigos deletados por que as minhas fontes eram "falsas". No entanto, não pratiquei Hoax, porque todos os artigos que eu criei foram embasados em livros e mencionados nos artigos, como esse aqui.

Outros artigos, como este, além dos livros tinham também fontes referenciadas, como essa lei que apelidou uma rua em seu nome, podendo ser conferida aqui.

Eu não tive sequer chance de me justificar, fui bloqueado infinitamente na Wiki EN e ainda pediram meu bloqueio global dois minutos depois!

Minha boa-fé se baseia, principalmente, porque quando eu percebi que os artigos estavam sendo questionados, eu mesmo pedi suas eliminações, como pode ser conferido aqui

Se você olhar na página do pedido de bloqueio global, ele está pedindo o bloqueio por eu ser um sockpuppet, mas eu não sou um sockpuppet e fui perdoado daquelas acusações imputadas a muito tempo.

Além disso, criei outros diversos artigos que sequer foram banidos, USANDO AS MESMAS FONTES, como Nera, Bardo, Giovanni, e muitos outros.

Fui banido permanentemente da wiki en com a razão de "claramente não estar aqui para contribuir em uma enciclopédia", porém isso não é verdade, eu só criei e expandi os artigos em questão, incluindo este, porque na página de discussão as pessoas estavam pedindo a expansão do artigo, conforme pode se conferir aqui.

Na wiki pt eu patrulho páginas novas, fui responsável por propor a deleção muitos vandalismos, e responsável por criar, dentre outras, o artigo a repeito do tiroteio na Carolina do Norte, que pode ser visto aqui

Por favor, por empatia, peço que me ajude a não ser bloqueado globalmente, e ser desbloqueado na wiki en! Houve uma GRANDE confusão, e eu estou sofrendo uma grande injustiça.

Por favor, peço socorro! (O Correto (talk) 11:59, 19 May 2021 (UTC))[]

Invitation for Functionary consultation 2021[edit]


I'm letting you know in advance about a meeting I'd like to invite you to regarding the Universal Code of Conduct and the community's ownership of its future enforcement. I'm still in the process of putting together the details, but I wanted to share the date with you: 26 June, 2021. I do not have a time on this date yet, but I will let you soon. We have created a meta page with basic information. Please take a look at the meta page and sign up under the appropriate section.

Thank you for your time.--BAnand (WMF) 14:04, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[]

WikiProject Pt-Br[edit]

Olá Teles, me informaram, há uns meses atrás, que você costumava traduzir (ou ainda traduz, não sei) páginas aqui do Meta para pt-br, tendo isso em vista, gostaria de convidá-lo a conhecer o WikiProject Pt-Br para, se quiser, participar e, podendo, contribuir, principalmente com nosso glosário. Abraços, --Felipe da Fonseca (talk) 11:52, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[]

@Felipe da Fonseca, oi. Obrigado pelo convite. Traduzo ocasionalmente sim.
Recomendo que converse também com o Eduardoaddad, que traduz num volume grande. O SGrabarczuk (WMF) também pode se interessar pelo projeto, já que ele costuma solicitar traduções aos lusófonos. Boa sorte! —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 15:10, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[]
Ok Teles, obrigado pelas recomendações, ambos estão obviamente convidados. Abraços. --Felipe da Fonseca (talk) 15:20, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[]
@Felipe da Fonseca @Teles, obrigado pelo convite! I'll take a look at this WikiProject! SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 10:01, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[]


Hello, you seem to have overlooked Special:AbuseLog/1320792, Special:AbuseLog/1324410, and probably also Special:AbuseLog/1325959 (more recent), since you had locked all the others from that time. Since I didn't see it in your global.js, I recommend the script mark-locked.js. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
08:41, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[]

@1234qwer1234qwer4, that's veeeery useful. Thank you! —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 17:24, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[]
Just in case, since you had locked all others from 26 July, Special:AbuseLog/1333209. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
22:09, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[]
@1234qwer1234qwer4, done. —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 06:24, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[]

Steward requests/Global/2021-06#Global lock for Molana Ijaz sock(s)[edit]

Are you sure? They were spamming across at least three different editions of Wikipedia (English, Urdu, Arabic), and four other projects (English Wikiversity and Wikinews, MediaWiki, Wikispecies). You might want to check their deleted contributions specifically. Also, one of their accounts, مولانا اعجاز (talk · contribs), is already locked. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
12:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[]

@1234qwer1234qwer4, thanks for adding that. I will be locking them. —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 03:23, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[]
For documentation purposes, Special:CentralAuth/حقانی کرم is another sock which I had noted at the SPI but was not confirmed as it was not registered on enwiki. Thanks @Cromium for locking. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
19:26, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[]

Filter 276[edit]

Not entirely sure why you disabled the filter within a couple minutes again, but it might be helpful to match an lcase()-transformed string with other lower-case strings. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
13:34, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[]

@1234qwer1234qwer4, that filter is just for tracking that kind of action while it is ongoing and is too much specific. I don't it's useful to let it active for good. At that moment, the vandal had stopped. —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 17:24, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[]
Okay. What I meant is that contains_any is not case-insensitive (just tested it), so you probably want the lower-case versions of the strings specified in the arguments. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
17:42, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[]
@1234qwer1234qwer4, ah ok! Got it. Will probably change that if/when reactivated. Thanks. —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 17:49, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[]


You didn't create a Miraheze account, did you? There's an account claiming to be you. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 11:53, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[]

@DarkMatterMan4500, hi! That account is NOT mine. Thanks for asking. —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 03:48, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[]
Well, thanks for the information. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) (contribs) 09:32, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[]

There is no-one like you.[edit]

We're lagging behind with the ntsamr spambots by one month already; hope you return soon. Wishing you a good remaining wikibreak! ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
17:30, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[]

@1234qwer1234qwer4, hi! Thanks for the message. I should be back in a few days. I will try to work on the backlog. —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 00:56, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[]
Hello, thanks for all your work. I know you are doing an immense job already (and I will reach out to another steward if you can't do this), but I would appreciate it if you skimmed the filter 72 log starting with July 13 over the course of the next couple weeks again—assuming you are now using the marklocked script, it should be easy to notice the unlocked accounts, and the vast majority are not false positives. They are pretty painful to report at SRG, as duplicates aren't that easy to spot (and some accounts might be CU-confirmable socks of another reported one), and due to the high backlog there, reports often take multiple days to be handled (it also seems that verifying abuse log entries is more time-consuming than locking from the full filter log, since it involves checking each account's log individually). Thanks again, ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
15:26, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[]
@1234qwer1234qwer4, hi! I can start doing it in a few minutes. With regards to what I said above about working on backlog, I will keep trying, but perhaps that's an impossible mission. Last month bot creation increased profoundly, and I am not sure if I can keep track of them. —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 15:29, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[]
Thanks a lot. I did notice that the activity seemingly increased too, though my first thought was that this might have been related to the absence of underlying IP blocks while you were away. I guess this is a very hard mission to do alone (and I'm not familiar with any stewards as well as to know if anybody else would be willing to help), so this might suggest that we really need more stewards—or some kind of (semi-)automation for dealing with abuse filters. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
22:44, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[]

İhtilafa Davet[edit]


Azerbaycan dilinde yazamıyorum ama sizin Türkçe anlayacağınızı umuyorum. Türkçe Wikipedia'daki bir tartışmayı, sahip olduğunuz sıfatla gözden geçirebilirseniz memnun olurum çünkü dışarıdan bir gözle bakmadan çözülemeyecek gibi görünüyor:

Şimdiden teşekkür ederim. Ahmetbeyinceketi (talk) 14:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[]

@Ahmetbeyinceketi, hello. Sorry, but I don't. From a translator machine, you are asking me if I can understand Turkish. I don't. Again, sorry. —Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 15:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[]

No problem. Thank you for your interest. Have a nice day. Ahmetbeyinceketi (talk) 15:43, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[]