Abstract Wikipedia/Wiki of functions naming contest/Wikirosetta

Wikisetta or Wikirosetta

Voting

Proposed by BugWarp
Support BugWarp (talk) 02:19, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

I kinda like the name (maybe "RosettaWiki" would be even better). It probably doesn't meet the desideratum of The name should not restrict the wiki only towards the goal of the Abstract Wikipedia or be only about natural language and content abstraction, but should reflect the potential that the functions may be used in a large diversity of ways and places., but I don't know how important that is. PiRSquared17 (talk) 01:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not a fan, sorry. "Rosetta" and "Babel" are already overused for naming a lot of products related to languages, language learning, machine translation, etc. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 11:03, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As this will be a Wiki of functions and not a Wiki of translations, this is not a name explaining what it is. Though Abstract Wikipedia is at least one of the main goals, afaIk it is not the only application of the functions. --CamelCaseNick (talk) 18:05, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Changing proposal to use non-CamelCase, per talkpage. Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 20:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
S-U-P-P-O-R-T as Wikisetta, the Wiki for coding and translating beyond functions and abstractions. It's simple and recognizable almost instantly and without any confusion. --2603:9000:A511:9E76:C4A9:4067:3725:A098 15:23, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for your comment. Unfortunately votes are limited to this criteria. Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 21:06, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is a good name. Enjoyer of World (talk) 03:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]