Affiliations Committee/Advisors/2022
Update: Effective 1 February 2022, the application period has closed.
The Affiliations Committee – the committee responsible for guiding volunteers in establishing Wikimedia chapters, thematic organizations, and user groups – is looking for advisors!
The main role of the Affiliations Committee is to guide groups of volunteers that are interested in forming Wikimedia affiliates. We review applications from new groups, answer questions and provide advice about the different Wikimedia affiliation models and processes, review affiliate bylaws for compliance with requirements and best practices, and advise the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees on issues connected to chapters, thematic organizations and Wikimedia user groups.
We are looking for advisors who are excited by the challenge of empowering volunteers to get organized and form communities that further our mission around the world. In exchange, committee advisors selected will gain the experience of supporting their world-wide colleagues to develop their communities as well as personal development in guiding organizational development, facilitating affiliate partnerships, and professional communications.
AffCom advisors can engage with the committee in a variety of capacities:
- Consultant
Individuals with extensive movement experience can be engaged as Consultants for specific cases or initiatives by AffCom.
- Trainer
Individuals with specific expertise may be engaged for short-term projects for training AffCom or Affiliates. They might also lead the Capacity Building initiatives for AffCom or affiliates.
- Observer
AffCom can request specific or all advisors to act as an observer in different cases to ensure neutrality & compliance with guidelines.
- AffCom Support
Development of Policies: While advisors cannot create legally binding policies for the committee, they can help create policies that provide direction and support for the committee.
Planning and Implementing Community Relations: The advisors are long-term wikimedians & also include influential community leaders who can be effective at spreading the word about initiatives and services.
Supporting Subcommittees: The advisors can support subcommittees that have assigned tasks in specific areas.
Other Tasks: Advisors can be engaged to address a specific need. Such engagements are usually short-lived and are disbanded as soon as their specific goals are met.
- Key skills
We look for a healthy mix of different skill sets in our advisors, including the following key skills and experience:
- Strong understanding of the structure and work of Wikimedia affiliates and the Wikimedia Foundation.
- Readiness to participate in political discussions on the role and future of affiliates, models of affiliation, and similar topics.
- Availability of up to 2 hours per week, and the time to participate in a monthly two-hour voice/video meeting
- International orientation and ability to work and communicate with other languages and cultures.
- Knowledge of different legal systems and experience in community building and organizing are a plus.
- Fluency in English is required; skills in other languages are a major plus.
- Experience with or in an active Wikimedia affiliate is a major plus.
- Strong track record of effective collaboration (such as evidenced skills at facilitation, mediation, negotiation, and so forth) is a major plus.
- Willingness to use one's real name in committee activities (including contacts with current and potential affiliates) when appropriate.
- Selection process
As a reflection of our commitment to openness, transparency, and bilateral engagement with the Wikimedia community, the 2022 advisors selection process will include a public review and comment period. All applications must be posted on Meta between January 01 and January 31, 2022 at Affiliations Committee/Advisors/2022, and the community will be invited to provide comments and feedback about each candidate. At the end of the nomination period, the applications will be voted on by the members of the committee, taking into account comments put forward by the committee's members, advisors, Wikimedia Foundation staff and board liaisons, and the community. A final decision will be made in February 2022, with new advisors expected to begin later that month.
- How to apply
If you are interested in advising the committee, please submit your candidacy on Affiliations Committee/Advisors/2022 between January 01 to January 31, 2022. Your application must include the following information:
- Your full name and Wikimedia username
- A statement describing your relevant experience, skills, and motivation for joining the committee as an advisor.
- The advisor role you would like to serve
- Answers to the following three questions:
- How do you think affiliates work best together to partner on effective projects and initiatives?
- What do you see as the role of affiliates in the Wikimedia movement in the next three years?
- What do you feel you will bring as an advisor to the committee that makes you a uniquely qualified candidate?
Nominations
[edit]Hello, folks! My name is Lucas Teles, I am Brazilian and work as a doctor in "real life". I'm a wikimedian since 2007, started out editing on Wikipedia in Portuguese, but I've gone through different projects and taken on different wiki roles since then. From years of work at Ombuds commission and as a Steward, I am used to deal with conflict management, sensitive information, different languages and groups.
Among my motivations for volunteering, the one I consider fundamental is to ensure that users are able to successfully interact in projects. I usually work on mentoring newcomers, helping outside groups to perform their activities on our projects respecting our internal rules. This inclination leads me to be interested in helping as an AffCom advisor.
I plan to use the experience I have in the editorial part of projects, add to the knowledge I have acquired with outreach activities and intend to gain from the experience on the committee, adding an editorial body perspective to AffCom
I have participated of two Wikimanias (Wikimania 2014 and Wikimania 2019) and many other smaller events. I am a member of Wiki Movement Brazil has been a long time and saw our members to become more and more engaged, professional and not only technically skilled, but we also have matured our ability to handle conflicts. As for myself, I still have a passion for Wikimedia, but at the same time I have acquired the ability to better deal with opposing opinions and come up with friendly solutions. I hope to be able to add this experience also in the area of conflict resolution of the committee.
From 2019 to 2020, I worked as a strategy liaison for Wikimedia Foundation in one of the phases of the Movement Strategy. That was a new experience for me, where I could improve many skills, like communication, task prioritizing, working with deadlines, besides getting to know better our communities.
Answers to the three questions
[edit]- How do you think affiliates work best together to partner on effective projects and initiatives?
Identify similarities and respect differences. Sharing information that can help new members work around problems that everyone faces, yet there is understanding and respect if different groups make different decisions that they believe are more realistic for their culture and region. Working together should be seen as an option; an offering to exchange experience, reduce the workload, and ensure greater representation of the different existing cultures.
- What do you see as the role of affiliates in the Wikimedia movement in the next three years?
I like the idea of affiliates that are able to engage local community to better work together, identify their own gaps and surpass it. They can work for different purposes, but what I think is essential for affiliates is working to diminish the gaps. And we are full of them. Every region will have a different one, with different means to solve them. Affiliates are made up of members from their own region interested in collaborating who understand more of their reality than people from other places and, therefore, are better able to solve their own problems, even if some outside help facilitates this process. So, for the next three years, I would like to see more specific gaps to be solved from each region, besides the broadly known ones.
- What do you feel you will bring as an advisor to the committee that makes you a uniquely qualified candidate?
I have a strong bond with editorial community, but I'm also engaged with outreach activities. I have seen and acted in many conflicts, frustrations, differences in expectations when users coming from these two strands of our volunteer bodies come together. For example, when a GLAM activity involves the creation of articles on Wikipedia, it is common for such conflicts to arise when there is not good preparation. I believe, therefore, to be able to improve relations between these communities and facilitate the entry and stay of new members or affiliates in the projects.
I believe I have something to offer to the committee as an observer or AffCom Support, but I know I have a lot to learn about committee matters and I will spare no effort to absorb the required expertise.
I am available for any questions. I hope to see more colleagues from South America joining the committee, in order to have a diverse body. Thanks.—Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S˲» 02:06, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Endorsements
[edit]
Strong support Very experienced user who has served in many global positions in our movement and who has a track of successful community communication. Teles will be especially good to support new applications coming from the Global South. --Joalpe (talk) 15:28, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Questions for the candidate
[edit]Hi all, I'm Aleksey Chalabyan a.k.a Xelgen, IT professional, Wikimedian since 2006, FLOSS evangelist, Mozillian, OpenStreetMapper, l10n/i18n enthusiast and professional, amateur photographer.
Since I joined my home hy:wiki (Armenian Wikipedia) in 2006, in it's very early stage when it had barely thousand articles (mostly stubs) I had a chance to try different wiki-roles: Guiding newcomers, creating essential templates, RC patrol, translations of policy and help pages, sysop, localization at trasnlatewiki, scanning/digitizing print encyclopedias, organizing first editathons, wiki-evangelism, running bots, developing gadgets and tools. Co-organized WLM in 2013 and served as jury.
I've been to Wikimania in 2008, 2010 and 2014, as well CEE meetup in 2016 and Wikimeida Conference in 2018. I remember times when we just announced our first ED and started making things a little bit more official. I've been following mailing-lists and Meta and en:wp/Commons discussions since my early wiki-life. I believe I "lurkedmoar" for enough and I have something to return to global movement now.
I have good, first hand experience with many non-profits. I was volunteering since I was 16, co-founded my first non-profit in 2004. Later in 2013, I helped in founding Wikimedia Armenia and served as board member in 2013-2014 and 2015-2018 (de facto). Besides being no stranger to non-profits I also worked at Open Society Institute Foundation, consulted other local funds, and I'm trustee of non-formal Awesome Foundation Yerevan. This gives me a good understanding of both donors and grantees perspective, challenges and needs. With over 22 years online and volunteering being my lifestyle, I've been part of different online/FLOSS communities and projects. I've observed them rise and fall, and I think that taught me few things about personal motivations, dynamics and patterns in communities. Importance of ownership, institutionalizing, and institutional memory. Keeping the spirit and having inflow of new participants. Roles bigger companies and governments sometimes want to play. Besides volunteering, 18 years of professional experience in very diverse environments, ranging from 2 person startups and non-profits, to Fortune 500 multi-nationals and UN agencies, gives me good understanding of how different teams and organizations of different size, type, maturity can be and how each requires individual approach.
As IT consultant I deal with sensitive information on daily bases. As someone who wears many hats I've learned to sense and avoid/disclose conflict of interests whenever possible, and expect same for others.
Roles I might be useful in
[edit]I think I might be of most help in the roles of Consultant and Observer. I'd be happy to help in Supporting Subcommittees or Other tasks at hand in all cases where my experience, cultural understanding or knowledge might be of use, taken I also have enough time in the period and there are no COI.
Answers to the three questions
[edit]- How do you think affiliates work best together to partner on effective projects and initiatives?
I believe that regular communication and safe, healthy, cooperative environment will help affiliates in learning more about and from partners, aligning resources and complementing each other. But it's also important to understand that each affiliate, project and community is different too, and our variety and dynamics should be taken into consideration and adjusted for.
- What do you see as the role of affiliates in the Wikimedia movement in the next three years?
Being a bridge, and active facilitator between local communities and global movement. Remembering where we're coming from, and also where we need to move. Helping communities grow and develop, yet refraining from substituting the communities. Not forgetting that numbers are indicators not goals. Moving past bike-shed color . And to name few specific things, implementation of UCoC and moving towards 2030 goals would be first things which comes to my mind.
- What do you feel you will bring as an advisor to the committee that makes you a uniquely qualified candidate?
- As someone born and risen on the border of European and Middle-Eastern culture, in late USSR, I have cultural understanding of broad region, or should I say 3 subregions (Eastern Europe, Middle East and post-Soviet). That also includes social and political nuances, which if properly accounted, navigated and balanced may turn (what may seem as) weaknesses into strong points.
Being bilingual person, who uses three languages on daily bases helps in seeing things from multiple perspectives. Roughly 16 years on wikis and more in broader FLOSS community give me a good understanding of how our movement started and evolved in this time-frame. What works, and what not. Dynamics in and around communities and affiliates. 18 years of work experience in diverse, international organizations, total of 10 years as board member of few non-profits, as well foundations taught me few things, I'd be happy to put into use. Experience with co-founding WMAM, while dated, may still be of use when guiding newly created Affiliates. Nearly 20 years of being moderator, admin/sysop online and nearly decade as board members of non-profits also helped in dealing with conflicts, listening to all sides, and keeping cool-head, with first hand experience on pros and cons of both escalating and not escalating things. Learning from both personal mistakes and mistakes of others were a very valuable lessons. Last not least: I believe long term, personal commitment to and believe in the missions of Wikimedia movement make me qualified, though I'm glad that I am not unique in this one.