This proposal is a larger suggestion that is out of scope for the Community Tech team. Participants are welcome to vote on it, but please note that regardless of popularity, there is no guarantee this proposal will be implemented. Supporting the idea helps communicate its urgency to the broader movement.
Sadly, it is in the list of never happen. I support your views, but I think the board of WMF do not even now what a Wiktionary is, who are the readers or contributors, its potentialities. Noé (talk) 11:26, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I understand your feelings, @Noé. The reason why this idea is on the list you pointed at is strictly related to Community Tech. This team is not able to build (and later, maintain) such big projects. However, having this need in writing yet another time is valuable! SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 20:59, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, we can't afford to create and maintain a mobile app from scratch, much less two, but this is a great idea and deserves attention so I'm moving it to our Larger suggestions category. Thanks for participating in the survey, MusikAnimal (WMF) (talk) 00:10, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is IMO unlikely to happen as long as Wiktionary is wikitext-based. Trying to use wikitext as a database is a huge development burden and makes almost anything beyond just displaying the pages infeasible. A transition to Lexeme would make this a realistic project (although probably still too large for Community Tech). --Tgr (talk) 01:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]