GLAMTLV2018/Submissions/Re-defining Cultural Program

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Information

This is an Open submission for GLAM TLV Conference 2018 that has not yet been reviewed by the members of the Program Committee.

Submission no. 60
Title of the submission
Re-defining Cultural Program
Etherpad

Author(s) of the submission
Giselle Bordoy (WMAR)
E-mail address
comunicacion@wikimedia.org.ar
Country of origin
Argentina
Affiliation, if any (organisation, company etc.)
Wikimedia Argentina

Type of session
Talik
Length of session

30 min

Ideal number of attendees

Abstract

Talking about GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums) to refer to the cultural programs in the Wikimedia movement is inclusive? Really, the cultural spaces of the world can be included in museums, galleries, archives and libraries or is knowledge and culture built in other cultural spaces? Does GLAM really represent the reality of Global South or should we break with the nomenclature in our contexts? During 2017, Wikimedia Argentina ask itself some of these questions and began to re-design the GLAM Program to a new one: Culture and Open Knowledge. The main reason: build a more open and suitable cultural program according to the needs and reality of our context. How? Identifying what culture means in each local context, reaching out new partnerships, organizing new cultural projects and build long term relationships. Results: New cultural partnerships outside GLAM institutions to design cultural projects adapted to our local context.

What will attendees take away from this session?
  1. Identify new meanings of culture and new opportunities to carry out cultural programs.
  2. Design and organize cultural programs according to their local contexts.
  3. Build long term and win-win relationships with new cultural partners.
Slides or further information
Special requests

Interested attendees[edit]

If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest.

  1. --Ivana Guslarevic (talk) 11:08, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
  2. GualdimG (talk) 08:12, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
  3. Celina Strzelecka (WMPL) (talk) 06:00, 3 November 2018 (UTC)