Grants:PEG/ITOCA/Train-the-trainer South Africa workshop/Report
Compliance and completion
- Did you comply with the requirements specified by WMF in the grant agreement?
- Answer YES or NO.
- Is your project completed?
- Answer YES or NO.
- Did you use any of the grant funds?
- Answer YES or NO.
Activities and lessons learned
This section describes what the grantee did, and what the grantee learned from implementing the project. This section should be useful to others implementing similar projects and is an opportunity for the grantee to reflect on the project's performance.
The workshop was structured to include two weeks of online training and exercises prior to the two day intensive face to face training.
- A workshop announcement was designed explaining the purpose of the course and the criteria for selection.
- An application form was designed to be attached to the course announcement
- The workshop announcement was sent to ITOCA's various networks in South Africa and ITOCA's contact database- universities, community libraries, colleges, banks and Non-Governmental Organizations
- Collation and review of received application forms - 39 applications were received
- Feed back and acceptance emails to selected participants- 32 applicants were selected
- Instrusctions were sent out requesting participants to start the two weeks online pre-workshop study and exercises.
- We prepared information notes for participants with hotel information, directions to the venue, starting times and other such detail related to the logistics of the workshop.
- Communicate with Wiki Ttrainer David Richfield on training material and printing requirements.
- Workshop venue hire
- Computer and internet equipment hire
- Training room setup
- Day 1 of the workshop began at 9am
- Assisted with co-facilitation where necessary
- Allocation of per diems to the participant
- Day2 of the workshop. Ended with a closing word from the director of ITOCA to encpourage participants to go and use the skils learnt.
- Sent out a post workshop email for feedback on the workshop
- Designed a post workshop survey, sent 2 months after the workshop and collected feedback
- What lessons were learned that may help others succeed in similar projects? Consider the following questions and respond with 1 - 2 paragraphs.
- What went well?
The response rate to the announcement was high with more people confirming their availability and interest than the number we needed. This meant that we were able to select more appropriately those we thought would use the training well. We had a well balanced mix of participants from academic institutions, public libraries as well as from the commercial sector. Everyone managed to have their own computer meaning they all had hands-on experience with Wikipedia. The interest during the workshop was very high and the participants’ knowledge of Wikipedia was very misinformed. Training on what Wikipedia is, brought so much positive feedback ,interest and a change of attitude towards Wikipedia.
- What did not go well?
There were a few challenges with the internet connectivity on the first day. The backup internet as fast as it could have been, while the main source of internet was being set-up.
- What would you do differently if you planned a similar project?
To avoid technology glitches such training workshops should in future be held mid-week starting from Tuesday to allow for setup and testing of all equipment and systems.
Project goal and measures of success
This section should reference the project goals and measures of success described in the approved grant submission. See Grants:PEG/ITOCA/Train-the-trainer South Africa workshop to review the goals and metrics listed in the approved submission.
- Provide the project goal here.
This workshop aimed at increasing awareness of Wikipedia and its core principles, encouraging participants to use Wikipedia efficiently and well, and attracting new contributors. The goals of the project included:
- Central training of volunteer Wikipedians to embark on training others in the country.
- Increasing the attention and support of Wikimedia by the cascading effect where those trained will go and train others.
- The influencing of students and other community members to not only use Wikimedia but also contribute.
- The training of the information experts to ensure that there are always trained experts who can be called on to help
The workshop emphasized this to partiipants from the announcement and reinforced some points to support these goals to the participants. The participants all agreed that they are willing to support Wikipedia and will seek to train others as much as they can.
- Did you achieve your project goal? How do you know your goal was achieved? Please answer in 1 - 2 paragraphs.
The project goals were achieved as the participants were trained. Almost all of them were not registered users of Wikipedia until the training. They actively started contributing during the training and this was well embraced. When asked if they had trained someone after the training, a few confirmed that they have gone on to train someone or even groups for those in academic institutions. The other participants had intentions to train, with various reasons such as protocol, logistical arrangements and the time tables of students.
Measures of success
- List the measures of success exactly as provided in the approved grant submission, and evaluate your project according to each measure listed there.
- Satisfaction of trainee-trainers from the central training, measured by a feedback survey. The survey would focus on the degree to which the trainees feel able to deliver training themselves..
- The main measure of success would be the number of training events held by the trainees in their respective institutions and communities. We will consider the project a success if at least 75% of the participants deliver at least one training event within three months of the end of the central training.
- Success will also be measured by getting feedback from those trained by the trained participants.
- Provide an overall assessment of how your project went according to these measures.
The project managed to achieve the intended measures of success. This is because a survey was sent and almost half of the respondents agreed that they are able to deliver training others. The training was held towards the end of the year, due to many delays which the Wikimedia foundation is aware of. This may have affected those who went on to train within three months as those in academic institutions have only recently opened. We may track the other participants’ activities after another two-three months.
An email was sent about four weeks after the training asking the participants to give feedback on the training. Those who responded were very positive and felt that the training was a success which added value to their careers or expertise. We have had a few more inquiries from those who did not manage to get trained on when the next training workshop will be held. We also had an inquiry to whether we would also train beyond South Africa as we had inquiries from those outside the country including an inquiry from Asia.
7 months after the workshop another follow-up evaluation survey was sent to the participants. In total there were 25 respondents to the evaluation survey. The survey can be found at https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/9Q7JYLB
On satisfaction, 100% said that participating in the Wikipedia training was of benefit to them.
36 % said they contributed content to Wikipedia on your own. Some of the reasons given for this were time constrictions and language. Only 2 respondents said they delivered scheduled, frontal training (at least 1-2 hours) sessions.
When asked “have you faced any challenges or do you plan on training?” Many responded that they could not get support from their institution. Fro others it was an issue of availability of faculty and academics.
- If you were to plan a similar project, would you measure it differently? If yes, please explain how.
We would add more measures if we were to do a similar project such as:
- the number or frequency of contributions to Wikipedia by those trained
- the number of participants who join the local Wikimedia chapter after the training
- the number of participants whom we can join as observers during their trainings
This section ties this project to Wikimedia's broader goals, and shows what the project accomplished.
- What impact did this project have on WMF's mission and the strategic goals? Please answer in 1 -2 paragraphs and include specific measures of impact such as the number of readers or editors reached by a particular project, or the number of articles edited or improved.
- Stabilize infrastructure
- Increase participation
- Improve quality
- Increase reach
- Encourage innovation
The project’s impact was varied and fitted within the WMF’s mission and strategic goals. An increase in the participation and reach was achieved by training trainers who are based at public institutions where there is a higher cascading effect to the greater number of potential contributors as well as users of Wikipedia. The trainers will be able to train their students, clients as well as library users who can be encouraged to be innovative in their contributions to Wikipedia. Some of the participants who were trained at the workshop came up with innovative ideas on topics and information that plan to contribute to Wikipedia.
Reporting and documentation of expenditures
This section describes the grant's use of funds
- Did you send documentation of all expenses paid with grant funds to grants at wikimedia dot org, according to the guidelines here? Answer "Yes" or "No".
- Please list all project expenses in a table here, with descriptions and dates. Review the instructions here.
- These expenses should be listed in the same format as the budget table in your approved submission so that anyone reading this report may be able to easily compare budgeted vs. actual expenses.
- Note that variances in the project budget over 10% per expense category must be approved in advance by WMF Grants Program staff. For all other variances, please provide an explanation in the table below.
|Expense Item||No.||Days||Rate||Total in Rand||Total in USD||Remarks|
|1.1||Participants travel||0||3||0||0||0||Participants institutions to pay for transport|
|1.2||Local transport||3200||427||Participants local transport. Shuttle company provided their invoice of R1540, the remaining R1660 was fuel costs.|
|2.1||Participants (lodge B and B)||12||3||560||20160||2688||Road Lodge only 12 of the Participants stayed at the hotel, the rest commuted.|
|2.2||Participants per diem (Dinner)||12||3||120||4320||576|
|4||Materials & Supplies|
|4.1||Computer hire||9907||1321||Computer hire|
|4.3||Stationery and DVDs||34||30||1020||136|
|5.3||Local Transport||0||0||0||0||0||The trainer volunteered to pay all his transport costs.|
|5.4||Flight||Trainer was based locally and commuted everyday|
|6.1||Project Management of Evaluation||2760||325|
|Exchnage rate $1=R7.5|
- Total project budget (from your approved grant submission)
|Budget||No.||Days||Rate||Total in Rand||Total in USD||Remarks|
|1.1||Participants travel||30||3||0||0||0||Participants institutions to pay for transport|
|1.2||Local transport||30||2||80||4800||640||Participants local transport|
|2.1||Participants (lodge B and B)||30||3||520||46800||6240||Road Lodge-Centurion 3 nights|
|2.2||Participants per diem (Lunch + Dinner)||30||3||150||13500||1800||Lunch @R75 + Dinner @R75 per day|
|2.3||Tea breaks x2||64||3||15||2880||384||Two tea-breaks per day|
|3||Materials & Supplies|
|3.1||Computer lab hire (30 PCs)||1||2||1000||2000||267||Computer lab hire|
|3.2||Printing-workbook||30||1||15||450||60||Training materials printing|
|4.3||Local Transport||1||3||200||600||80||Including airport transfer|
|4.4||Flight||1||1||1||3000||400||Return flight from Cape Town to Johannesburg|
|Exchnage rate $1=R7.5|
- Total amount requested from WMF (from your approved grant submission, this total will be the same as the total project budget if the WMF grant is your only funding source)
- Total amount spent on this project (this total should be the total calculated from the table above)
- Total amount of WMF grant funds spent on this project (this total will be the same as the total amount spent if the WMF grant is your only funding source)
- Are there additional sources of revenue that funded any part of this project? List them here.
- Are there any grant funds remaining?
- Answer YES or NO.
- Please list the total amount (specify currency) remaining here. (This is the amount you did not use, or the amount you still have after completing your grant.)
- If funds are remaining they must be returned to WMF, reallocated to mission-aligned activities, or applied to another approved grant.
- Please state here if you intend to return unused funds to WMF, submit a request for reallocation, or submit a new grant request, and then follow the instructions on your approved grant submission.
Request for reallocation