Grants talk:IdeaLab/Women are everywhere

Great idea![edit]

Hi Kenzia, thank you for sharing your idea. It has great possibilities to do two thing which are both measurable.

1) The idea could encourage editors to find orphan articles about women who need to have links from other articles. 2) The idea could encourage the inclusion of information about women who are not notable by Wikipedia standards to have an article but a reliable source(s) has encyclopedic content related to them.

Could you expand this idea more with details about how you think an on site plan could be organized to accomplish your idea? Sydney Poore/FloNight (talk) 10:29, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Related ideas[edit]

Hi Kenzia Related ideas: Looking at the description of these ideas, I see similarities in the target audience and the work that would happen on and off site. So, it might be a good idea to consider working together on one idea if the idea is going to move to the stage of a proposal for funds. Even if there is no request for funding for any of these ideas, it still might be a good idea to talk among yourselves to coordinate your activities where they overlap.

The biggest community resource needed for success of plans is not money but people to work on projects. So, if we can combine projects we can prevent overstretching the people who are interested in working on the gender gap issues. Sydney Poore/FloNight (talk) 15:12, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]