Meta:Requests for adminship/Wutsje

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Wutsje[edit]

Dear all, I would like to propose Wutsje as Meta-admin. Wutsje is very active in watching the recent changes here on Meta, he is also admin on nl.wiki, fy.wiki and Commons and a global rollbacker. Furthermore he is very skilled in cross-wiki-counter-vandalism and an active member of SWMT.

Besides having a good set of languages Wutsje is polite, friendly, objective, helpful and calm. I do trust this user fully and hope You all see it the same way. --birdy geimfyglið _(:> )=| 20:19, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Acceptance

Thank you Spacebirdy, I accept this nomination. Wutsje 20:20, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support very, thanks for Your work here and everywhere, --birdy geimfyglið _(:> )=| 20:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom — str4nd ⇌ 20:20, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - He obviously does a lot of good here on Meta, but also on various other small projects. * I don't see any objections and thus Wutsje has my full support. m:Mark W (Mwpnl) ¦ talk 20:23, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, yay —Dferg (talk) 20:26, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, without a doubt. Huib talk 20:36, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MacedonianBoy 20:45, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cbrown1023 talk 20:56, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thogo (talk) 21:11, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support obviously. Wutsje is a very good RC/NPP patroller. From what I have seen, and interactions with Wutsje, I trust him to be a competent and a good admin here as well. --Kanonkas 23:15, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trusted capacities on other projects, and positive contributor here as well. Cirt (talk) 00:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nakon 01:10, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 02:19, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 03:10, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support SUL 10:16, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support per all. Alex Pereira ^falaê 11:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course --Herby ^{talk thyme} 12:06, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Frank Schulenburg 20:54, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
support, very useful!--Nick1915 -^{all you want} 21:34, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
support --Jan eissfeldt 01:18, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:36, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support No concerns. Adambro 13:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
support --A. B. ^(talk) 13:39, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Erwin 13:54, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- mhha "하" Mr Ha 00:40, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Marbot 18:37, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. →Na gy 17:31, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Guido den Broeder 17:47, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Would you mind giving a short explanation? →Na gy 19:25, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, but it is wiser not to. Guido den Broeder 19:58, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, qualified indeed. -- Menti fisto 01:12, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --_~Innv^s: 03:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course. oscar 12:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted.—Anonymous Dissident^Talk 21:48, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]