Jump to content

Meta:Requests for comment/Update of Meta:Deletion policy

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
The following request for comments is closed. This RfC is closed as successful, and the policy page has been updated. StevenJ81 (talk) 17:59, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion by community consensus[edit]

Any user can propose a page to be deleted at Meta:Requests for deletion for any stated reason.


To nominate a page for deletion please follow the following instructions:

  • Please place {{RFD}} at the top of the page. If it is a template, please consider wraping the RFD template in <noinclude></noinclude> tags.
  • Create a new subsection at Meta:Requests for deletion under the appropriate header.
  • You must notify the creator of the page of the deletion request. Please consider notifying to the principal contributors to the page as well with {{subst:RfD notice}}.

Once a page or a list of pages have been nominated for deletion, users may discuss the request, with the request open for a minimum of one week. At the conclusion of the discussion, an administrator will determine the consensus and thus will delete or keep the page. In any case, the request will be archived. If the page is kept, the closing administrator will note on the talk page of the page proposed for deletion the result of the discussion with {{deletion requests}}. Administrators deleting material under this clause should use a permanent link to the discussion for future reference.

Speedy deletion clauses[edit]

Meta-Wiki's deletion policy allows administrators to summarily delete pages that meet one or more of the following criteria. To propose a page for speedy deletion please add to the top of the page {{delete|Reasons to delete the page}}. This will add the page to the speedy deletion category.


  • No meaningful content or history: This includes test edits (e.g., "asdf" or "Can I really create a page here?"), obvious nonsense, corrupt images, legitimately blanked pages or vandalism.
  • Advertising or other inappropriate promotion, including spam.
  • Attack pages: content created solely to attack, threaten or denigrate any user, person or organization. See the Resolution on biographies of living people and our Terms of Use § 4.
  • Content which is clearly out of scope, such as encyclopedic articles, dictionary definitions, and any other material that is best suited on any other Wikimedia Project.
  • Reposted content: previously deleted according to this deletion policy, unless it was significantly rewritten in a manner that calls into question the deletion reason.
  • Banned contributor: content created and edited solely by a indefinitely blocked or globally banned user after they were banned or blocked. The terms of use allows to "refuse, disable, or restrict access to the contribution of any user who violates" those terms. Please note that deletions performed under this clause can be controversial and thus subject to contestation.
  • Redundant content: identical to another, with no significant differences between them.
  • Copyright infringement: content which is a clear and proven copyright violation, or content previously deleted as a copyright violation.
  • Author's request: deletion per request of the author, if the author is the only significant contributor, the request is not in bad faith, and the content is not to the benefit of the Meta-Wiki. This category includes requests by a user to have pages deleted in his/her own user space, with the same limitations applying.
  • Possible copyright infringement: where no evidence of freeness or permission could be obtained, or the copyright status was not cleared after 7 days it was tagged with {{possible copyright violation}}.


  • Articles transwikied to, or already present on, another project, if a soft redirect is not appropriate.


  • Unfree files: files that are obviously copyright infringements, or are licensed under any non-free license including any form of fair use, or that don't allow commercial use or modification.
  • Files unsourced and/or unlicensed for more than one week after the uploader was notified.
  • File is available on Wikimedia Commons or was transferred from Meta-Wiki to Wikimedia Commons after checking that the image satisfies the inclusion criteria of Commons.
  • Corrupt, missing or empty files. Files that are corrupt, missing, empty, or contain superfluous and blatant non-metadata information.


  • Trivial housekeeping deletions that are highly unlikely to be controversial (such as in preparation for a page move or history merge).
  • Unneeded or broken redirects that do not have a serious edit history.
  • Unneeded talk: a discussion page for deleted or non-existent content.
  • Empty categories. Categories empty for at least a week, excluding those stating that they should be retained even when empty.

Special procedure for certain materials[edit]

Any page tagged with {{looks useless|reasons here}} can be deleted after 60 days. Any user can remove the tag provided that they leave an explanation of why they think the content is not useless on the article's talk page. The user that placed the template must be notified. If the explanation is not satisfactory to him, this user should not place again the template, but can open a request for deletion as mentioned above. The deleting administrator may at their discretion convert the request into a deletion discussion or decline it altogether.

Revision deletion[edit]

Revision deletion is a core MediaWiki function that allows administrators and users with the appropriate rights to hide individual revisions from non-administrator users. Wikimedia projects are based on transparency, but sometimes individual revisions will be hidden because their content is abusive or infringes on policies. Revision deletion allows for log redaction as well, however this feature is intended solely for grossly improper content, and is not permitted for ordinary matters. Applying revision deletion to log entries should only be used for grossly inappropriate content as actions recorded in logs (e.g blocks) are meant to be easily reviewable by anyone.


Any user that disagrees with a deletion can propose at requests for undeletion that a page or revision be restored. The procedure is similar to the community deletion process. When proposing a page for undeletion, please notify the deleting administrator. After at least one week after the posting of the request, an uninvolved administrator will process the request. Pages may be undeleted if they meet the inclusion policy or the deletion did not conform to this deletion policy; a mere lack of comments on the undeletion request is generally not sufficient.