Meta talk:Administrators/Removal (inactivity)/April 2017
Add topicLatest comment: 7 years ago by Syum90
@MF-Warburg: What is the status of this? Thanks. —MarcoAurelio 18:46, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- I started going through the list but got bored/distracted and haven't taken it up again. Up to Az1568 (inclusive), Amire80, Anthere and Avraham have to sign. --MF-W 21:27, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
- @MF-Warburg: Would you plan to continue building the list or, given the dates, just close this and do the check in October? I'm unfortunately with limited time this month and the next maybe. —MarcoAurelio 14:44, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- @MF-Warburg and MarcoAurelio: I've closed the process before seeing this discussion because it had been a long period of time since MF-W started it, and I supposed that nobody had been affected and MF-W just had forgot to close the process. I went here to inform MF-W about the close of the process when I've seen your discussion. Syum90 (talk) 12:25, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- @MF-Warburg and MarcoAurelio: I've reopened the process. Syum90 (talk) 12:35, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- Let's just consider this round skipped. --MF-W 14:07, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- Can't an administrator give out the notices? Or perhaps another bureaucrat should be elected? --Rschen7754 16:45, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- The main problem is that there is no tool to help check the criteria and one has to check via Special:Log (and occasionally also Special:Contributions) ca. 60 times. Other solutions would be possible, but I don't think it makes sense to now, mid-May, do the check for the October-April period. --MF-W 18:48, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- Taking into account that it's almost June I'm agree on skipping this round.--Syum90 (talk) 14:35, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
- The main problem is that there is no tool to help check the criteria and one has to check via Special:Log (and occasionally also Special:Contributions) ca. 60 times. Other solutions would be possible, but I don't think it makes sense to now, mid-May, do the check for the October-April period. --MF-W 18:48, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- Can't an administrator give out the notices? Or perhaps another bureaucrat should be elected? --Rschen7754 16:45, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- Let's just consider this round skipped. --MF-W 14:07, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- @MF-Warburg and MarcoAurelio: I've reopened the process. Syum90 (talk) 12:35, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- @MF-Warburg and MarcoAurelio: I've closed the process before seeing this discussion because it had been a long period of time since MF-W started it, and I supposed that nobody had been affected and MF-W just had forgot to close the process. I went here to inform MF-W about the close of the process when I've seen your discussion. Syum90 (talk) 12:25, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- @MF-Warburg: Would you plan to continue building the list or, given the dates, just close this and do the check in October? I'm unfortunately with limited time this month and the next maybe. —MarcoAurelio 14:44, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I've finally marked the round as skipped. Regards.--Syum90 (talk) 10:02, 19 August 2017 (UTC)