The following request for comments
is closed. No scope of meta action here. This kind of dispute should be resolved locally. Ajraddatz (talk) 17:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Good afternoon, I apologise for problem adminship, I used the de-adminship
Business in that, me pereodicali template editor such isn't present. I regard it as prosecution for "political" reasons, application of sanctions to suppress my point of view.
Now as a matter of fact.
The administrator OneLittleMouse has blocked me for a delicate de-adminship. The claim in unblock account and IP, which comment my actions so has been submitted. --22.214.171.124 07:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
The reason for blocking your IP for a period of 12 hours was given by OneLittleMouse as только анонимные пользователи, запрещена регистрация учётных записей, which translates as anonymous users only, account creation disabled. Are we going to guess what this is about? Why don't you provide links to the disputed edits? Or you might ask at ru:Обсуждение участника:OneLittleMouse. Just my suggestions. --Gereon K. (talk) 09:09, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- The phrase you cited corresponds just to block settings. The real reason is обход блокировки, i.e. block evasion. I don't think that a ban for a block evasion deserves an RfC — NickK (talk) 09:16, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support OneLittleMouse, remove sysop and checkuser rights de-adminship. 126.96.36.199 14:32, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- OLM on de-adminship. 188.8.131.52 14:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)