This language has been verified as eligible. The language is eligible for a project, which means that the subdomain can be created once there is an active community and a localized interface, as described in the language proposal policy. You can discuss the creation of this language project on this page.
The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics, recent changes). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
"Wikinews talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace)
Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons.
If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin"). Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons.
I oppose for now. The Dusun language don't even have a Wikipedia (current request). It seems that there's no interested community and the development project has little content. I do think that they should concentrate first in a Wikipedia --if it gets approved-- and then, when a sizable community and manpower is avalaible, they should request the creation of other sister projects. Rationale isn't convincing and does not provide any useful information nor demostrates a "need". -- Dferg☎ talk 16:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Oppose Low activity on beta Wikipedia, there's absolutely not a community that can grow up the project and Wikinews really needs daily contributes. --Gce (talk) 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Comment There is no rule which states is mandatory to a language community to have a Wikipedia before being allowed to ask for another language edition of other sister projects. Maybe this decision of chosing Wikinews first instead of Wikipedia would be strange, but you should ask proposer(s) the reason behind their decision before opposing. --Zerabat (discusión) 01:34, 1 March 2018 (UTC)