A committee member provided the following comment:
No valid ISO 639 code found, rejected under the LPP for artificial languages; no sufficient proof at all including the speaker community or widely used enough, etc. --Sotiale (talk) 12:09, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics, recent changes). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
"Wikipedia talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace)
Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons.
If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin"). Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons.
I want to start a new language, the "Aldorian". I would like more people to know it even if it is just an invented and slightly improvised language.
The RicaMariWana--RicaMariWana (talk) 14:22, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Languages must have ISO 639-3 codes, which Aldorian doesn't. Also, newly invented languages without a community won't get an ISO 639-3 code or a Wikipedia.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:23, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You either created a test request, or you'd better go to Incubator Plus 2.0 which is a perfect place to store marginal (at best) Wikipedia projects. Your language if exists doesn't even have an ISO code. --Wolverène (talk) 08:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]