This proposal has been approved. The Board of Trustees and language committee have deemed that there is sufficient grounds and community to create the new language project.
A committee member provided the following comment:
The community needs to develop an active test project; it must remain active until approval (automated statistics, recent changes). It is generally considered active if the analysis lists at least three active, not-grayed-out editors listed in the sections for the previous few months.
Item about the language at Wikidata. It would normally include the Wikimedia language code, name of the language, etc. Please complete at Wikidata if needed.
"Wikipedia talk" (the discussion namespace of the project namespace)
Enable uploads
no
Default is "no". Preferably, files should be uploaded to Commons.
If you want, you can enable local file uploading, either by any user ("yes") or by administrators only ("admin"). Notes: (1) This setting can be changed afterwards. The setting can only be "yes" or "admin" at approval if the test creates an Exemption Doctrine Policy (EDP) first. (2) Files on Commons can be used on all Wikis. (3) Uploading fair-use images is not allowed on Commons (more info). (4) Localisation to your language may be insufficient on Commons.
"Continent/City", e.g. "Europe/Brussels" or "America/Mexico City" (see list of valid timezones)
Additional namespaces
For example, a Wikisource would need "Page", "Page talk", "Index", "Index talk", "Author", "Author talk".
Additional settings
Anything else that should be set
submit Phabricator task. It will include everything automatically, except additional namespaces/settings. After creating the task, add a link to the comment.
It is for Burmese there, I can't realize this is the language for Mons in Myanmar, it is reading for the language, in Wikipedia, more language in myanmar will read there. --Cyrus noto3at bulaga (talk) 11:23, 5 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Strong support There is a lot of activity, as well and a very good degree of quality in the articles. It's a historical language with a long history. Nikosgranturismogt (talk) 18:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This is now under approval ongoing, please invite linguistics to verify the contents. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:32, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Dear Liuxinyu970226 do you mean the LangCom need a professional linguist to confirm our project? We have one, who is a native Mon and living in Thailand. He is the key person on the teaching of Mon language for Mon children in Thai primary school in Thailand. Bee Htaw Monzel
