From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Stewards‎ | confirm‎ | 2009
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning The 2009 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.


logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

  • Languages: cs, en-3, pl-3, sk-2, eo-2, ru-1, de-1
  • Personal info: statement here
  • Языки: cs, en-3, pl-3, sk-2, eo-2, ru-1, de-1
  • Личная информация: (здесь должно быть заявление)

Comments about Zirland[edit]

  • Not really very active at all if I'm honest here. Majorly talk 00:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Strong remove, didn't even leave a statement. Prodego talk 03:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • About 85 right changes since the elections and most self and mostly for doing something a local admin would have done themselves..shows lack of knowledge of the steward policies ...--Cometstyles 03:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Remove, per Cometstyles. --Brownout(msg) 10:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Remove, per Cometstyles also. —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 16:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support If I needed help, he was always available and able to help or answer my questions. Vasiľ 16:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support I trust him. --Ragimiri 16:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove - The most recent rights changes are appropriate, however the initial (and ongoing for quite some time) inappropriate rights changes in addition to other issues such as those birdy points out... it's just not confidence inspiring. I don't see abuses here, but that's the bare minimum - stewards should be held to a higher standard than the bare minimum.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 19:25, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
    And another seemingly-inappropriate rights change without any request today? No, stewards shouldn't function this way.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 21:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
    Personally, I don't think this was an inappropriate action. Zirland acted following the Slovak Wikipedia policy on inactive sysops and the user's talk page. On the other hand, some official request for this would be more transparent for other users. -- Mercy (|) 22:11, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove Remove --FollowTheMedia 17:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
    Remove. John Vandenberg 05:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
    Abstain; the issues that Cometstyles mentions influenced me, however on a second look I see the actions since April are more appropriate steward actions. John Vandenberg 06:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Moral Support Support, but having a statement is much better.--Jusjih 03:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support. Better steward with low activity than neither. Like Vasiľ too. --Jagro 20:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Looking at the logs I'd say remove here, very few rights changes and in the beginning even to have only insight in deletion logs and the last one was a right change on an user who did not even ask to be bot [1], I did not see a request anywhere either; Prskavka@skwiki no request for this removal either; global indefinit block? Sorry, but I think that Zirland never really started working fully in that area and therefore he imho seems not to be familiar with the policies and practices, he seems not interested either, because there is no statement, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 20:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Weak Support Support, per Vasiľ & Jagro. -- Mercy (|) 16:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support. Qualified...keep. bastique demandez! 19:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Strong Support Support. The only steward who understands Czech and Slovak languages; both have Wikipedias with 100,000+ articles and sister projects. --AtonX 23:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove not providing the quality service we have a right to expect fr33kman t - c 04:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove sorry, but too much mistakes and he doesn't seem to understand stewards policies--Nick1915 - all you want 19:53, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support, same opinion like AtonX. --Bubamara 22:16, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove per Mikhailov Kusserow. Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 06:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Same opinions like Jagro and AntonX. --Podzemnik 15:05, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Remove Remove--Shizhao 14:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
  • don't know what to do. Good-faith-ness vs. inactivity. --FiliP × 17:53, 21 February 2009 (UTC)