Stewards/confirm/2009/en

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Stewards‎ | confirm‎ | 2009(Redirected from Stewards/confirm/2009)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning The 2009 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.
Stewards (2009 confirmations)
English:

The 2008-09 confirmation has begun.

The 2008-09 steward elections are a good opportunity to check if we are still happy with our current stewards. To make the process as smooth as possible, here is how things are organized.

To comment, please log in with an account that has edits (on any wiki) before February 1st 2009. During the 2009 elections, please mention if you are unhappy with one of the persons listed below and why. For example, you may mention inactivity or negative behaviour. Inactive stewards, as stated in the steward policies, will lose their steward access.

At the end of the elections, the current and newly elected stewards will consider complaints left on this page, and choose to remove stewardship as necessary taking into account both the comments left by community and their own perspective and understanding of the job. All stewards will go through this process after each election.

See also:


Purge the cache of this page?

.anaconda[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: en
  • Personal info: statement here

Comments about .anaconda[edit]

The following discussion is closed: Resigned.

Hello, I was thinking on resigning in the last days due to inactivity - this is the reason I ignored this page; just done. Thanks for expressing your opinion. --.anaconda 23:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Andre Engels[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: nl, de-3, en-4, fr-2, most other Germanic/Romanic languages-1
  • Personal info: statement here

Comments about Andre Engels[edit]

The following discussion is closed: Confirmed. Nihil Obstat Effeietsanders 01:50, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support OK to continue for me, but please take a break if you're getting annoyed at something. Majorly talk 00:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Active in the SWMT-area, doing a good job as a steward, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support You're doing a good job, please go on! --Thogo (talk) 00:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Keep up the good work, don't let yourself go done my some users what bad ways of communication. Romaine 01:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Since getting his stewardship a mere 10 months ago, he has been really active as a SWMTmember , keep up the good work :) ..--Cometstyles 02:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support for a cosmopolitan SWMT looking forward! Galoubet 13:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Very active in the SWMT area. Yes indeed!--Nick1915 - all you want 13:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support IMHO I think he is doing a good job so I would like his stewardship confirmed —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 15:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Does good work with SWMT in particular - keep.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 17:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • No statement... Prodego talk 23:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 10:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Cf. Majorly. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Endorse. keep up the good work. - Mailer Diablo 04:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --oscar 22:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Confirm, for sure. — Dan |talk 23:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support--Jusjih 02:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support---Zyephyrus 21:41, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --82.74.166.225 02:48, 7 February 2009 (UTC) aka User:Tjako[reply]
    Please log in to comment. —Pathoschild 21:19:33, 08 February 2009 (UTC) Yes check.svg Done Tjako 16:43, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Annabel 15:30, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please confirm, he's doing a great job. Wutsje 16:37, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Dolledre 03:00, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support - Woudloper 11:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • support Thanks for the job you're doing. Finn Rindahl 11:49, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support.--Ahonc 22:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support. Have doing a good job. Alex Pereira falaê 15:43, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Obvious Support Support Kylu 20:36, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 03:59, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support aleichem 11:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support A very Good Steward who help me to find sockpuppts of a vandal userAmir 11:36, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support ...Aurora... 13:05, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Hégésippe | ±Θ± 14:20, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Pevernagie 22:27, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support MoiraMoira 16:31, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confirm --Meno25 17:04, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Techman224Talk 04:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Without any doubt, one of the most important Wikimedia programmers. But, I don't like the fact that he didn't write a statement. --Millosh 12:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Shizhao 13:56, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep --FiliP × 17:32, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Angela[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: en
  • Personal info: I've been a steward since 2004 and I hope to continue being useful in this area. I also chair the Wikimedia:Advisory Board and help with Wikimania (jury and program). I'm an admin on meta, the English Wikipedia, and the advisory and foundation wikis. I haven't been as active as I'd planned to be this time last year due to spending all my spare time on planning my wedding! Since that happened (in November), I have been more active within Wikimedia generally and plan to continue this. The steward areas I focus on are changing rights and deleting cross-wiki spam (example). I'm happy to do other steward tasks as well like SUL requests and global blocks but at least in the past couple of months, there have been no requests that weren't already handled immediately by a few super-active stewards! I'm in #wikimedia-stewards if I'm on IRC and can easily be reached by email in emergencies as I'm online 16 hours a day.

Comments about Angela[edit]

The following discussion is closed: Confirmed, no objections. —Pathoschild 01:56:03, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Not amazingly active, but still, I'm happy for her to continue. Majorly talk 00:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Doing a good job as a steward, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Thank you for your job :) Lvova 00:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Although not overwhelmingly active, you're doing well. Please be around more continously. :) --Thogo (talk) 01:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • A bit inactive, perhaps too much so Prodego talk 03:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Agree with everyone so far, except Prodego :) ... Plus Angela's comments on the stewards-l mailing list (something non-stewards don't have visibility to... trust me it's true :) ) have been sage, and she takes feedback awesomely for someone as senior as she is. Here's hoping she can find more time to be with us this year. ++Lar: t/c 04:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Her wedding to another wikimedian kept her busy for a while but now she is back, welcome :) ..--Cometstyles 04:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support COI - I'm also up for confirmation. She has been there since the start and is well-trusted by the community. I say keep as steward. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 05:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Confirm. Good work. MBisanz talk 06:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Not highly active, but her experience is a valuable contribution, and she does good work.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 16:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support I imagine a more productive 2009, Wedding certainly kept her preoccupied before. --Charitwo 23:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support - A lifetime experience on different issues is valuable Galoubet 11:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support cf. Thogo. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:12, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support to confirm, -jkb- 17:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Endorse. keep up the good work. - Mailer Diablo 04:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Duh. —Sean Whitton / 18:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --oscar 22:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confirm, of course. — Dan | talk 23:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Confirm Agree with Majorly. --Meno25 23:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support---Zyephyrus 21:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Confirm, she is doing a good job. —Dferg (meta-w:es.) 15:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support fr33kman t - c 04:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confirm, Angela isn't inactive (I'd prefer she helped a bit more though). guillom 11:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Woudloper 11:10, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support support Thanks for the job you're doing. Finn Rindahl 11:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support--Ahonc 22:52, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support, per above. Alex Pereira falaê 15:44, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support, and I'm glad to see her more active lately. Kylu 20:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 04:00, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support aleichem 11:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support ...Aurora... 13:06, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Kaganer 17:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --Elijah/אליהו (Eliyahu)/إلياس (Ilyas) (Me!) 16:12, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support per Majorly. Juliancolton 00:26, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Techman224Talk 04:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Not so active, but still a very important person in Wikimedian community. --Millosh 12:5* 8, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep Keep--Shizhao 13:56, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Alefbe 22:49, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support and expect her to be more active now that she's happily married :) --FiliP × 17:32, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anthere[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: fr, en
  • Personal info: I have been a steward since the first election. I am also admin on fr.wiki, en.wiki, and commons as well as bureaucrat on fr.wiki. I am a founding member of Wikimedia France and a past trustee (and chair !) of Wikimedia Foundation. I currently mostly edit on fr.wiki, as well as a bit sometimes commons and fr.books (though often unloggued). And I do quite a lot at the chapter level. To be fair, my activity as steward in the past year has been low (hmmm, very low). First because as trustee, it was simply not a good idea to use these tools. And then I took a psychological break. But I'll be happy to help more in the coming year. I am usually available on irc as well for urgent needs. Cheers

Comments about Anthere[edit]

  • Not amazingly active, but she was busy doing other important things for Wikimedia. I'm happy for her to continue. Majorly talk 00:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Avialable via irc if there is something urgent, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • You are not very active as a steward, but available on a nearly daily basis which is absolutely fine for me. Merci. --Thogo (talk) 01:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Very few activities in the last year - doesn't seem to be needed in urgent cases, too. Please reduce the number of stewards to the really needed. --APPER 01:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per Majorly, birdy, and Thogo... institutional memory is important and she's been there when really needed. ++Lar: t/c 04:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per Lar ..--Cometstyles 04:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • COI - I'm also up for confirmation. Been plenty active as far as Wikimedia activities are concerned. She is also obviously trusted by the community and is a good person who I consider a friend. :) --Daniel Mayer (mav) 05:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confirm. Good work. MBisanz talk 06:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Does excellent work, just not very much of it. I'd prefer to see more activity, but for now I will say keep.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 16:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Something between APPER and Thogo. :-/ —DerHexer (Talk) 12:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support to confirm, -jkb- 17:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support to confirm --Serein 20:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Endorse. Keep up the good work. - Mailer Diablo 04:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support to confirm esby 16:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Anthere has given so much to Wikimedia, why not trust her to give a little more if she is willing? —Sean Whitton / 18:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --oscar 22:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confirm, of course. — Dan | talk 23:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confirm I hope to see her more active. --Meno25 23:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support--Jusjih 02:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support---Zyephyrus 21:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove, per blatant inactivity. Get the rights if you need them, give them back if you don't. guillom 11:04, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Woudloper 11:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • support per Majorly, Lar, Sean etc. Thanks for the job you're doing.Finn Rindahl 11:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --Ahonc 22:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support, per above. Alex Pereira falaê 15:45, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support and here's hoping to see you more active. Kylu 20:40, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Per Kylu. Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 04:11, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --Bertrand GRONDIN – Talk 10:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support aleichem 11:34, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support ...Aurora... 13:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Hégésippe | ±Θ± 14:20, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Vyk 18:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support En passant 19:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Zetud 20:41, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support not very active, but you never know. In case of a serious problem, we would not need any Steward to take action, but we would need Anthere to take action because she has the legitimacy to do it. Teofilo 22:22, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Kaganer 17:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep I would like to see Florence as a little bit more active steward. --Millosh 12:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Shizhao 13:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Sebleouf 22:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Alefbe 23:07, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep but I'd like to see more activity this year, now that she's not a chair anymore. --FiliP × 17:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bastique[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: en, fr-3, es-2
  • Personal info: I was elected steward in 2006, and while I'm not as active as some other stewards in general duties, due to my role as Volunteer Coordinator for the Foundation, I still feel I have something to offer as a steward and believe I can still be trusted with the steward buttons. Thanks.

Comments about Bastique[edit]

  • Keep rights! Active enough for me. Majorly talk 00:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Doing a good job as a steward, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for your job :) Lvova 00:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • You are always helpful and couraged. Thank you. --Thogo (talk) 01:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Of course, great steward. Prodego talk 03:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good steward, always helpful and awesome.--Shanel 04:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • COI - I'm also up for confirmation. Of course Bastique sould be confirmed. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 05:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confirm. Good work. MBisanz talk 06:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sure! Good work--Nick1915 - all you want 13:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Of course. Stifle 14:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Of course! :) The Helpful One 14:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think he is doing a great work and he desserves his stewardship confirmed. Thanks —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 15:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Does good work & is highly available to be called upon.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 16:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • absolutely --Charitwo 23:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Since you work with the Wikimedia Office, it's essential that you have the Steward role. miranda 00:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep of course --Fabexplosive The archive man 10:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Of course, very helpful. Always available when I need him. :) —DerHexer (Talk) 12:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • No issues at all. Keep up the good work. GlassCobra 15:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes check.svg Helpful, patient, capable, and accessible. -- Avi 15:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Clearly needs to be a steward and has done a fine job so far. JoshuaZ 16:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep, you're indispensable! →Na·gy 19:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Coimeád - absolutely! - Alison 19:38, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes --Serein 20:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Endorse. Keep up the good work. - Mailer Diablo 04:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. esby 16:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • A fine steward and a fine volunteer co-ordinator. —Sean Whitton / 18:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes...keep the rights :). Razorflame 20:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good will, good job behind, this person has my support.--Juan de Vojníkov 20:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --oscar 22:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confirm, naturally. — Dan | talk 23:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confirm of course. --Meno25 00:00, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support--Jusjih 02:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support---Zyephyrus 21:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Obviously confirm, what would we do without Cary :) guillom 11:04, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Woudloper 11:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Finn Rindahl 11:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Does a good job. –Ejs-80 22:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support, é claro! Alex Pereira falaê 15:46, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support of course. A key cog in our machine. Kylu 20:40, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 04:12, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support aleichem 11:35, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support ...Aurora... 13:09, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Hégésippe | ±Θ± 14:20, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support helpful and speaks French remarkably well. Teofilo 22:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support - Kaare 19:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Alefbe 22:15, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Crusader95 8:07 12 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support --Miya 11:10, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support I think you deserve to be a permanent Steward :-D --Elijah/אליהו (Eliyahu)/إلياس (Ilyas) (Me!) 16:13, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove Mr. Bass certified Poetlister sockpuppet “Cato”, thereby allowing him to become a checkuser on Wikiquote and gain access to the global checkuser mailing list.[1][2] He never answered when I asked him what steps he took to verify “Cato’s” identity,[3] instead, congratulating himself and his buddies for a job well done.[4] Amazingly, he is paid to do this; it fell to volunteers to clean up after his mess. I can hardly think of a better place to start changing Wikimedia’s culture of zero-responsibility.Proabivouac 04:25, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    This has nothing to do with Bastique's stewardship and should be ignored here. User:Proabivouac is blocked on Meta anyway. --Thogo (talk) 23:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Not only has this nothing to do with stewardship, but the user also apparently doesn't understand the issues they're talking about.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 00:25, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Kaganer 13:54, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support, obviously. Juliancolton 00:31, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support - per WP:DUH. J.delanoygabsadds 23:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC) Am I the only one who wishes that was a bluelink?[reply]
  • No valid reason not to. DS 00:15, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • He displayed a silly, paranoid attitude on the Wikimedia Foundation article talk page regarding publishing anything showing the actual location of the Foundation office; treating this as a "state secret" is unbecoming of an organization supposedly priding itself on openness. Dtobias 13:43, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't understand what that has to do with being a steward.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 14:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --Baiji --> (Opinión) 15:53, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support I wasn't going to comment but since we have some ... er ... "interesting" opposes above, I may as well say that I think Bastique is doing a fine job as a steward and seems to be readily available for any issues that may arise. - Rjd0060 15:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Jennavecia|Talk 00:50, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove This user is deeply embedded in the power structure and represents a rotten status quo. Everyking 05:54, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep It is much funnier with him :) --Millosh 13:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Shizhao 13:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Sebleouf 22:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strongest possible Keep Keep. Daniel (talk) 22:40, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep --FiliP × 17:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cspurrier[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: en, de-2, fr-1
  • Personal info: I have been a steward since Dec 2006. I started grad school this year, which has reduced my activity a good bit. I am still about and I regularly follow the mailing list, and keep an eye out for new requests on wiki (though they are almost always done before I see them, some of the other stewards are doing too good of a job :) ). I expect to be much more active in the next few months and I will always be available for emergencies.

Comments about Cspurrier[edit]

  • Few edits this year, and none since August before you wrote this. Not sure you're active enough to warrant continuing. Majorly talk 00:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Too inactive, I think. --APPER 01:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • see APPER. Marcus Cyron
  • Too inactive for my tastes. Prodego talk 03:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Too inactive, per Majorly. The Helpful One 15:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • COI - I'm also up for confirmation. No actions in the last six months but more than 10 actions in the last year. Not technically inactive per our definition. I think we need to change our definition of inactivity after this election so everybody is aware of what is expected (simply changing and to or would suffice). But any definition change should not be applied retroactively. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 15:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm sorry, I don't consider you active enough to continue. Steward tools are meant to be used.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 16:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • when he says that he keeps an eye out for requests but they're usually done before he sees them, it seems a little hypocritical to revoke access based on "inactivity" -- I think there's a place for more "inactive" stewards that can serve as backup. Dedicated to the projects. -- phoebe 04:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Imho a bit too inactive, sorry! —DerHexer (Talk) 12:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Inactivity is not a compelling reason to remove stewardship. We do not have a limited number of stewardship positions. Everything else is in order. I see no reason not to reconfirm. JoshuaZ 16:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Inactivity per a number of the above. Tools are for using. --Herby talk thyme 15:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --oscar 22:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support. The stewards policy considers "inactive" as no steward action in the past 6 months and less than 10 steward actions in the last year. 100 rights' change look fine to me.--Jusjih 02:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove taking on an advanced role means that you are actually willing to do it; your inactivity in stewardship seems to indicate you don't want it; therefore you shouldn't retain it. fr33kman t - c 05:40, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Não mantem, as Herbythyme says. Alex Pereira falaê 15:48, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 04:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Removenot convincing.--RudolfSimon 21:50, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Without formal conditions for inactivity, one more year may make a space to see is he really inactive. --Millosh 13:02, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • remove - inactivity --FiliP × 17:35, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Mayer (mav)[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: en, es-2
  • Personal info: I was nominated and elected as one of the original stewards back in 2004. From mid 2004 to mid 2006 I was Wikimedia Chief Financial Officer and helped with the 2007-2008 drive. Because of that, many of my steward actions were related to fundraising drives. After the 2007-2008 drive I took a long - and much needed - wikibreak from Wikimedia activities. Since coming back in November 2008, I have helped comment on requests and set user rights on a sporadic basis due to the inconvenience of editing under one global account and performing steward actions under another. That is now fixed. If confirmed, I promise to maintain a higher level of steward activity.

Comments about Daniel Mayer (mav)[edit]

  • Extremely inactive - you should have handed steward rights back in at the end of 2007, or when you went inactive. I'm not sure based on your activity record you'd be suited to continue. Majorly talk 00:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    NOTE: Inactivity for a Steward is defined as "no steward action in the past 6 months and less than 10 steward actions in the last year." Most of what I've done since coming back from my Wikibreak is comment on requests and be on-call in the IRC channel, which of course is not in the user rights log. I'm back for certain now that my global account is the same as my Steward account. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 01:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Hmm, I'll AGF that you'll be around more this year. Majorly talk 01:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for assuming good faith that I'm telling the truth and will do what I say. :) --Daniel Mayer (mav) 04:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm sorry, I consider you to be inactive despite your showing up a few weeks before the confirmations, and I think you should be removed.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually, I came back from my extended Wikibreak in November 2008. Before that, I was busy editing the English Wikipedia - which was surprisingly therapeutic. :) If you like, I will place myself on permanent confirmation and thus be subject to faster recall if my activity drops again --Daniel Mayer (mav) 01:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Just to note that mav and I had a quick conversation about this, and I concluded that my initial "remove" was correct. Thanks  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 16:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    And even though I don't agree with you, I don't fault you for taking that stand. Perhaps I should have set the steward flag to my account to null before my Wikibreak. I honestly never thought my break would last as long as it did. But that is the past; I'm back now. Good luck with your own bid to become a Steward. :) --Daniel Mayer (mav) 20:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • see User:Mike.lifeguard. Marcus Cyron
  • Too inactive I think, not everything is defined by that simple definition Prodego talk 03:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Please look at the recent activity, especially in regards to commenting on requests and getting feedback on IRC on those requests. I plan to maintain a similar level of activity going forward. -Daniel Mayer (mav) 04:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I like what I see, and I'm glad you've come back. Institutional memory is another plus. I'd just ask you, if you think you're going to have to drop to completely inactive again, to seriously consider giving up your bit. But on balance I think we'd be worse off without your considerable experience and skills. Keep. ++Lar: t/c 05:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you! I can't make any promises if I'm hit by a bus, but if I go inactive again I will de-steward myself. Besides, I've been around since the first year of Wikipedia and was at one time super active in Wikimedia activities; wild horses could not drag me away from this completely. :) We are really changing the world for the better - who wouldn't want to help make that happen? --Daniel Mayer (mav)
  • Trustworthy, says he'll become more active. Keep. Cbrown1023 talk 15:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Excellent steward, concerns mentioned above do not convince me. — Aitias // discussion 19:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Trustworthy, hasn't broken the wiki. If he says he'll be more active in the future, let's let him. NuclearWarfare 20:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confirm, of course. — Dan | talk 01:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 10:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per mav, keep. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • He says he will be more active in the future, and has not given any indication in the past that he s anything but suitable and trustworthy. I am more than willing to extend the benefit of the doubt and trust that he means what he says and will follow through. -- Avi 15:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --oscar 22:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support. The stewards policy considers "inactive" as no steward action in the past 6 months and less than 10 steward actions in the last year. 170 rights' change look fine to me.--Jusjih 02:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support renewed activity, willingness to serve, and more than qualified. Please stay. bastique demandez! 19:00, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, per above and renewed recent activity. Kylu 03:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fine, states will be more active and thus is deserving of our continued support fr33kman t - c 04:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support retention. MBisanz talk 04:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - trustworthy and experienced stewards should not be removed because of inactivity, once their intention is to become active again. Woudloper 11:15, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support, have a great experience. Alex Pereira falaê 15:50, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Inactivity is indeed a concern, but when a user with great experience who has proven himself trustworthy and competent wants to continue contributing as steward, I say keep and thanks for volunteering. Regards, Finn Rindahl 20:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support, per Lar. Alefbe 03:54, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support -- per bastique :) phoebe 05:56, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Per Cbrown1023. --Millosh 13:04, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Shizhao 13:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep + get more active in the following period. --FiliP × 17:36, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Darkoneko[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: fr, en-3
  • Personal info: Darkoneko, 27 years old, bureaucrat @ frwiki. I sometimes make a mistake or two during my stewards activities, but I think I'm doing a correct job overall.

Comments about Darkoneko[edit]

  • Everyone makes mistakes - you're plenty active for me and do a good job :) Majorly talk 00:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Darkoneko seems to be doing fine. --Kanonkas 00:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Doing a good job as a steward, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • You're always there to help, thank you. --Thogo (talk) 01:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Active and competent; I see not issues here.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 02:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Darko is doing a good job Prodego talk 03:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Darko is doing an excellent job, keep up the good work *me pats kitty* ..--Cometstyles 03:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yep. ++Lar: t/c 04:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Despite being a cat, does very good steward and bot work. /me caresse Darkoneko.--Shanel 04:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Excellent job. − Elfix × talk (fr) 10:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good job, excellent steward :)--Nick1915 - all you want 13:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Useful, thanks --Herby talk thyme 15:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Always here to help and he make a very good job ! --Garfieldairlines 15:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confirm, he is doing a good job. —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 15:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Merci pour ton excellent travail de steward quotidien. Vyk 18:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • He does good work. miranda 00:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confirm. I have some misgivings due to this incident but as others point out above mistakes happen. My other interactions with Darkoneko have been positive. WJBscribe (talk) 01:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 10:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Very nice and helpful person! Thanks, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support to confirm, -jkb- 14:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support thanks for your useful SWMT work. --Nemo 18:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support to confirm --Serein 20:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Endorse. Keep up the good work. - Mailer Diablo 04:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am inclined to support, as you do a lot of good work, however I would appreciate it if you could please explain why you have been using steward tools for your home wiki (fr.wiki) such as doing a Checkuser and desysoping accounts? Also I am concerned that you sysopped user:Pmartin on frwikisource when they have very active crats and sysops, and Pmartin only has 11 edits on that project. Pmartin previously raised a discussion at their discussion board, and it would have been more appropriate for the user to alert the community of the problem again, rather than it be fixed[5] and noted after the event[6]. John Vandenberg 04:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello
    • The few checkusers I did were either due to emergency (large scale vandalism and no regular checkuser online) or cross wiki ones (several wiki, which make asking the local CUs of every of them very tiedous). I tend to avoid the later whenever possible.
    • About the desysoping, Stewards_policy#Avoid_conflicts_of_interest states that it is not a problem when it's a clear cut case (self request from aoineko last july) or emergency (sebleouf, last november), tho it's not too recommmended. Since it seems to raise a few concerns, I'll avoid doing so from now on.
    • PMartin is the founder of Linterweb, the company that made the search engine Wikiwix. He had previously been given global editinterface to maintain the javascript that point to that search engine. I must admit that I am not used of creating/affecting global groups, so giving him a very temporary sysop right so he could correct the bug seemed the best solution back then. Also, you have probably noticed he was given back that global right by another steward., some hours after I gave him the temp sysop.
    DarkoNeko 13:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • support. esby 16:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. /me likes cats. And seriously, he's doing the job fine. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 19:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --oscar 22:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confirm. — Dan | talk 00:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support.--Jusjih 03:00, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support--Zyephyrus 21:46, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • support Thanks for the job you're doing. Finn Rindahl 11:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support--Sadik Khalid 16:29, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • ça va sans dire--Vituzzu 11:40, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support, per above. Alex Pereira falaê 15:51, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Good kitty. :) Kylu 20:41, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 04:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support About the «Sebleouf case», I'm glad DarkoNeko took upon himself to promptly de-sysop as soon as concerns arose about this account being possibly compromised. We need available and reactive stewards on the major projects. --JY Rehby 04:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Hégésippe | ±Θ± 14:19, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose I don't rate him. See bellow, about Wikiwix. -- Perky 14:52, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support le vieux chat noir --P@d@w@ne 15:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove --Guil2027 15:58, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Toujours fidèle aux chats =) — EvpØk Ma c'haozeadennoù 17:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support En passant 19:19, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Esprit fort médiocre, personalité minimale (et d'ordinaire, de Minimis non curo), courtisan caractériel, donc parfaitement adapté au fauteuil de la fonction ; pourtant, je suis au regret de strong Oppose Oppose, hélas ! --Budelberger 20:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC) (Flag of France.svg).[reply]
    Translation: "Spirit quite mediocre, minimal personality (and normally, of trivial things I care not), courtier of difficult character, and thus perfectly adapted to the armchair of this position; nonetheless, I regret to strong Oppose, alas!" —translated by Pathoschild.
    Ce qu'il y a de bien avec les esprits simples, voire simplistes, c'est qu'ils sont d'Éminence prévisibles, et enfantins : à peine levés, ils poussent leur petit caca. --Budelberger 14:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC) (Flag of France.svg).[reply]
    Translation: "What's nice about simple (even simplistic) spirits, is that they are eminently predictable, and childish: barely awoken, they pop out their little poopoo." —translated by Pathoschild.
    Note : Budelberger has since been banned from meta for "constant trolling". It's his latest ban in a long serie, as he was previously banned on many wikipedia for similar reasons (including harassing people he don't like on their local bot flag request). DarkoNeko 22:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Moez talk 23:08, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose I disagree with your support of Wikiwix. This is an outside company having nothing to do with wikimedia. Teofilo 02:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, I don't understand what that has to do with Darkoneko's being a steward.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 02:51, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Of course support. Blinking Spirit 19:18, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support, efficient, friendly and helpful. Clem23 21:15, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • You are more active as a steward than as a bureaucrat on French wiki! If you often forget to process French wiki task, I Oppose Oppose you. but if not, I Support Support you to be a steward.--Kwj2772 () 03:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, frwiki has 4 others active stewards, so each of us hasn't that many things to do, apart discussing bordeline admin elections. DarkoNeko 22:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I wanted to say "Care your project also" via literary expression. I'm sorry for you to understand too directly. You had good jobs!--Kwj2772 () 02:08, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Active steward. --Millosh 13:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Very good steward. Sebleouf 21:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep - we need a cat. --FiliP × 17:37, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Same reason as above. ;p Diti (talk to the penguin) 22:07, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dbl2010[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: tr, en-3, de-2, az-2, tk-1, uz-1
  • Personal info: statement here

Comments about Dbl2010[edit]

  • No statement, no rights changes since 2007. Is it worth continuing as a steward? I don't think so really, sorry. Majorly talk 00:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agreed - remove.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I Agree ;). --APPER 01:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Me too. Marcus Cyron 01:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Inactive Prodego talk 03:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per Majorly ...--Cometstyles 03:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per Majorly. The Helpful One 15:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • No right changes during the last year are too less for me. Sorry! —DerHexer (Talk) 12:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Inactive. GlassCobra 15:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove. Not active. John Vandenberg 03:37, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Moral Support Support. The stewards policy considers "inactive" as no steward action in the past 6 months and less than 10 steward actions in the last year. 110 rights' change look fine to me, but having a statement no matter how short is better than not at all.--Jusjih 03:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove per Majorly fr33kman t - c 05:37, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Não mantem, inactive. Alex Pereira falaê 15:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 04:16, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove per the above. Tiptoety talk 00:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove--Shizhao 13:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • sadly remove - total inactivity --FiliP × 17:37, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DerHexer[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

English:

Comments about DerHexer[edit]

The following discussion is closed: Confirmed. Nihil Obstat Effeietsanders 02:03, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Obvious keep. Majorly talk 00:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support DerHexer is an excellent steward. — Aitias // discussion 00:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Keep up the great work. GlassCobra 00:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Active in the SWMT-area, doing a great job as a steward, also helped a lot solving account-problems and in bug-finding when SULwas introduced, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Active & doing it good. No concerns. --Kanonkas 00:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Really kind and well-working--Vituzzu 01:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support You're very active and available sort of every day. Thank you! *knuddel* --Thogo (talk) 01:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support excellent steward. --APPER 01:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Thanks for all the good work so far!! Very active steward. Romaine 01:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Very obviously doing a good job.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 02:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support He has been really active, though when i voted on his elections, I didn't think he would be but he has amazed me, Good job hexy :D ..--Cometstyles 02:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support DerHexer also = good Prodego talk 03:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lots of work behind the scenes... seems to be on IRC whenever I need advice. ++Lar: t/c 04:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Confirm. Good work. MBisanz talk 06:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Confirm, excellent steward --Church of emacs 09:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support good work --Berliner Schildkröte 11:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support DerHexer is practically everywhere, sure! Confirm!--Nick1915 - all you want 13:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support I see DerHexer around on IRC all the time, confirm! :) The Helpful One 15:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Confirm, per Lar —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 15:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Good work as a steward, confirm. macy 16:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Obvious keep. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 18:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Obvious keep. Razorflame 21:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Keep. Der Hexer is very active as an admin on de:WP, and still manages to be trusted by most everyone - not a mean feat. --Minderbinder 22:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Keep certainly --Fabexplosive The archive man 10:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support to confirm, -jkb- 14:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support natürlich -- Avi 16:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --Jón 17:12, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hard worker, Keep Keep. →Na·gy 19:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Very helpful and active. John Vandenberg 03:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Endorse. Keep up the good work. - Mailer Diablo 04:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep, hard worker, always on IRC, always helpful and friendly. In short: A perfect steward. --ChrisiPK 21:25, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --oscar 22:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Confirm. — Dan |talk 00:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Confirm One of our best stewards. Definitely keep. --Meno25 00:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support useful fellow. DarkoNeko 00:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Has all my trust. KveD (talk) 01:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support.--Jusjih 03:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support you're doing a good job as steward - support. --Rax 16:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support---Zyephyrus 21:52, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Annabel 15:30, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Seigneur de Bougie 00:22, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support - has shown a positive mentality and good insight - Woudloper 11:17, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support support Thanks for the job you're doing. Finn Rindahl 11:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --Tilla 12:37, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support--Sadik Khalid 16:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Efficient. –Ejs-80 22:52, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support, good job as steward. Alex Pereira falaê 15:54, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Kylu 20:42, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 04:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Hégésippe | ±Θ± 14:19, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support My full support, very smart and well organized.--RudolfSimon 21:55, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support - Kaare 19:45, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Has done good work. See no reason to remove the tools. Tiptoety talk 00:43, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --Elijah/אליהו (Eliyahu)/إلياس (Ilyas) (Me!) 16:23, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support confirmation, although I doubt this vote of confidence will be needed. Juliancolton 00:32, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support MoiraMoira 16:31, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Very active and helpful steward. --Millosh 13:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Shizhao 13:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Sebleouf 22:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • definitely keep. --FiliP × 17:38, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Thank you for your really good work. You would be a loss for stewardship! *huggle* :-) --buecherwuermlein 19:17, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Thank you for your excellent work! Keep it up! --M.L 23:00, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Drini[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: es, en-5
  • Personal info: Stats: I'm sysop at 6 or 7 wikis, checkuser on 3, been wikimedian for 5 years. As inter-wiki people know, my work these days as stewards is dealing with vandalbots and the alike. So here I'm on my 2nd confirmation to get feedback on my work as steward. Thank you for your input.

Comments about Drini[edit]

  • Support Support Drini is quite helpful & trustworthy. --Kanonkas 00:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Clear keep. Majorly talk 00:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Helpful and funny. miranda 00:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Active in the SWMT-area, doing a great job as a steward, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support You're a wonderful steward, always helpful and available. Thank you! --Thogo (talk) 01:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Drini has done a wonderful job as a steward. macy 01:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support He has my support.-- {Netito} 01:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Very obviously doing an excellent job.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 02:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just avoid hurting poor Chris G. :) Great job, helpful guy, and certainly a good steward. Prodego talk 03:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Haha, per Prodego, think about the little people :p ...--Cometstyles 03:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Despite grumpiness :)... one of the most hardworking stewards out there and has been for a while. ++Lar: t/c 04:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Always available, experienced in checkusering, oversighting, and crosswiki countervandalism. Also an expert in evil math.--Shanel 04:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Confirm. Good work. MBisanz talk 06:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Very helpful! Good work--Nick1915 - all you want 13:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support SupportObvious confirm. Stifle 14:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Strong support he is doing a very good job, he is funny and always try to help. Gracias por tu ayuda Drini. —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 16:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Obvious keep. Razorflame 21:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Keep of course --Fabexplosive The archive man 10:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Our beloved padre who helps all the time. Confirm, of course! Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support to confirm, -jkb- 14:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep, we need this guy. →Na·gy 19:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Coimeád - definitely. Grumpy? I'd not noticed ^_^ - Alison 19:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Very helpful and active. John Vandenberg 03:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Endorse. Keep up the good work. - Mailer Diablo 04:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Endorse - trusted & good work, thanks --Herby talk thyme 09:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Very level-headed in my experience; keep. —Sean Whitton / 18:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support He is always ready to help! --Baiji --> (Opinión) 18:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Yessir, keep, keep. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 19:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --oscar 22:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Confirm. — Dan | talk 00:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --Meno25 00:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support KveD (talk) 01:24, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support.--Jusjih 03:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support. Always active / Siempre activo, sigue así. --Taichi - (あ!) 05:57, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support---Zyephyrus 21:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support There is no such thing as evil math Face-devil-grin.svg -- Avi 05:13, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep, good steward. ~Innvs: 12:42, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Annabel 15:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Woudloper 11:18, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support support Thanks for the job you're doing. Finn Rindahl 12:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support--Sadik Khalid 16:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Very trustworthy. –Ejs-80 22:47, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support, muy y mucho activo, un gran trabajo como steward. Alex Pereira falaê 15:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support I'm inclined to support Drini (based on the overall good performance as steward). Nonetheless, I should say that I was dissatisfied by the way Drini handled this (I think if Drini wasn't too fast in defending Dungodung's mistake, we wouldn't see other mistakes like this ). Alefbe 19:51, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support without reservation. Kylu 20:43, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support of course, he is doing a great job. --Patricio.lorente 23:42, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 04:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support ...Aurora... 13:14, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support - Kaare 19:45, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Very active and helpful.--User:Antur - Talk/Discusión 06:00, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Tiptoety talk 00:43, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --Elijah/אליהו (Eliyahu)/إلياس (Ilyas) (Me!) 16:15, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove. Due to this steward´s recent activities with capricious blocking for his friend Netito 777 of User JMundo and myself and abuse of sysop priveledges on the English Wikipedia, I have no faith that he can be trusted with any position on the projects. His mendacious mischaracterizations of what was said show a disdain for the truth and honesty.Die4Dixie 21:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And sir, oh please explain me the high moral ground on canvassing? [7] [8] [9] es:Drini 21:44, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ad hominem attacks only serve to highlight your lack of suitability for the position. These users have a unique knowledge of your actions. Would you expect me to open a Request for comment on your actions and link to it here? Exactly what would you say was the ideal way to let people know about abusive behavior and the forum to comment on it? Perhaps leave a messgage on every user´s page on all the projects? Notifying three people of this election without suggesting what they say is hardly canvassing. I believe my friendly notification falls under [[10]]. It was sent to three people(limited number) and neutrally worded. Please explain how this is a violation of WP:CANVASS or is this another mendacious twisting of something that you cannot not know is not canvassing. If you do not understand the policy on canvassing to correctly identify it, then I realy question on more grounds you ability to serve as a steward.Die4Dixie 22:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
None of this has anything to do with stewardship. Drini is probably one of the best stewards we've ever had. You're essentially saying you're opposing him continuing his good work because he blocked you. Canvassing to people to get them to attempt to come and sabotage this discussion in your favour hasn't helped you one bit either. Please consider your future actions more carefully. Thanks, Majorly talk 22:49, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict)I'm not familiar with meta-wiki or non-English projects but I seriously doubt Die4Dixie's incident is going to overturn anybody's candidacy for anything - the other comments are universally in support. Thus, I suggest all parties keep some decorum here and not get into wiki-arguing. I think the handling of Die4Dixie's block on English Wikipedia was unfortunate (a block for reasons poorly stated and seemingly mistaken, possibly not as a neutral party, followed by being unavailable for a day). Also, even though as Majorly points out Stewardship is very different than adminship, because of the increased authority it should be even more important that one keep a calm head, not play favorites, not get into grudges or matches with individual editors, etc. It is normal that the target of a block will be upset and make accusations, reasonable ones and otherwise, and perhaps even speak out of turn. Turning the other cheek and dealing with that in a firm but dignified way so that the blocked party can, hopefully, cool down and rejoin the editing process is also part of the job of administering blocks. The strong protest against alleged canvassing seems defensive, and piling on. Having said all that, and with all due respect to D4D and his (in my opinion) reasonable upset, I don't see this as anything to disqualify a candidate. No lasting harm done on either side, so please let it go. Wikidemon 23:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Btw sometimes Drini you yourself are soft with canvassing, so we're all to blame anyway--Vituzzu 20:23, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Per Die4Dixie, if you're going to canvass I'll make it work backwards Alexfusco5 23:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Without Pedro, we would need 10 more hard working stewards to replace him :) --Millosh 13:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Shizhao 13:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep --FiliP × 17:38, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove I don't question his vandal fighting work, but he lacks experience in conflict resolution. Without entering into detail about my personal case, Drini has refused to mediate after my request, 1 and defended the actions of the other party involved, 2. I hope that my posting will catch the attention of another Spanish speaking steward, any help is welcome. Thanks, --J.Mundo 19:02, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • May I just bring to your kind attention that steward's role is not meant as "super-administrator"; a Steward is not a sort of mediator, nor decides but always conforms to the relevant policies. Thank you for reading. --M/ 19:09, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dungodung[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: sr, en-4, de-1, hr-4, bs-4, mk-1
  • Personal info: Well, I've been a steward for a year now. A quite active one, at that. Not much has changed since I was elected. My statement from roughly a year ago pretty much sums it all. Moreover, I enjoyed serving the community as a steward and hope to be able to keep contributing in the following period.

Comments about Dungodung[edit]

  • Keep definitely! Majorly talk 00:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Slightly active in the SWMT-area, and doing a good job as a steward, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Doing a good job, and you are active. No concerns here. --Kanonkas 00:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • You are doing a great job, thank you! --Thogo (talk) 01:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. miranda 21:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dungodung is active and does excellent work overall; keep.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 02:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - per Mike ..--Cometstyles 02:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also a good steward. Prodego talk 03:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Always there on IRC when I need advice, sage counsel on stewards-l. ++Lar: t/c 04:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Active steward and father of StewardBot.--Shanel 04:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confirm. Good work. MBisanz talk 06:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Essential... --Nick1915 - all you want 13:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Definite keep. Stifle 14:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confirm, he is always helping —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 16:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support -- Mercy (|) 16:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Majorly. Razorflame 21:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 10:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • You're even more available than me. ;) Very active, very helpful person. Nick's "essential" seems to be adequate. :) Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support to confirm, -jkb- 14:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Coimeád - yup! - Alison 19:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Very helpful and active. John Vandenberg 03:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Endorse. Keep up the good work. - Mailer Diablo 04:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fine with me, thanks --Herby talk thyme 15:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Quality Wikimedian, good experience and level-headedness. —Sean Whitton / 18:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --oscar 22:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confirm. — Dan | talk 00:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • useful fellow. DarkoNeko 00:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support.--Jusjih 03:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support---Zyephyrus 21:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Oppose -- I didn't had intention to vote here. As things are wright now, my vote won't change the outcome of this voting. But, this edit [11] of Dungodung made me change my mind and to react, to inform others about few things. Calling an user as "major troll", just like that, is below the level of a person that is a candidate for a steward. Does he know the meaning of the word "troll"? Has Dungodung ever read the rule WP:ETIQUETTE? How can he be sure that his message [12] wasn't a kind of trolling (provoking another user's response by posting provocative messages; see wictionary: troll: A person who posts to a ... in a way intended to anger other posters... )? That message of Dungodung was unecessary. Ordinary pouring of oil on the fire. Something else was "on the table"; why had he wrote something that could distract the discussion? Why hasn't he used the word "user who is unnecessarily too cautious"? Dungodung, here're my contributions on meta [13]. You can see my voting pattern. Are you so superficial that you haven't seen that? I cannot believe it. Or your pride is so hurted by having a vote against you 2 years ago (98 "yes" and 2 "oppose")? We don't have to have acclamatory elections. Giving powers to a user is a serious thing. Taking them away is much harder thing. If a user mentions unpleasant questions and "kills the acclamation mood on the party", that doesn't make that user a troll. To make things worse, you've added [14] "major troll, who is constantly trying to obstruct the procedures"??? Do you know the meaning of the word "obstruct"? And after all these personal attacks (what about policy WP:NPA?), Dungodung continues with [15] " I cannot really judge, seeing as I'm not in the community". Then why is he messing (and throwing mud on other user) into something that he cannot really judge, as he personally admitted? What does this mean [16] "Kubura's obsessions and phobiae shouldn't be solved in this manner". Dungodung, you're a steward, bureaucrat, admin. You've forgotten how is to be the ordinary user. You don't know how it feels when a user with undeserved wiki-powers (admin, bureaucrat etc.), a user that's not eligible for those powers, makes an idiot of you and whole community. And you cannot do a damn thing, since that uneligible user is protracting any procedure (in criticism of his/hers work or a removal attempt) by tedious, foggy, "play dumb" arguments. Kubura 17:55, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for your vote opinion. --FiliP × 18:58, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support, Keep forever! One of the best, always ready to help. Exelent job Filip!--Laslovarga 13:08, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Dolledre 03:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support call him an oger next time, perhaps he likes that better than "troll". Woudloper 11:21, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • support Thanks for the job you're doing. Finn Rindahl 12:03, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support--Sadik Khalid 16:32, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Absolutely not. Unbelievably bad check on a solid user. Synergy 21:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    One problematic check out of how many? Majorly talk 22:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for the opinion, but I'm not sure I understand your reasoning here. Do you find that my "inconclusive" results are not valid? You know, this was discussed among other stewards; I just did the check. --FiliP × 22:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Majorly: yes, this is the problem. An experienced CU would never have done a check on such poor evidence (unless I have it completely backwards and switching my identity = sockpuppet), and as such I don't think you can be trusted Dungodung. Frankly, all the stewards could have been there "talking" but at the end of the day, you ran the check, not them. Synergy 22:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually, I think an experienced CU probably would have. DarkoNeko 01:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Concur with DarkoNeko, any of the stewards would have taken this on. This opposition is absurd. bastique demandez! 19:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I really don't know enough details of this, but seriously, I can't imagine that any steward would run a checkuser on evidence like this without some additional information. What additional evidence did you guys look at before you ran the check? NuclearWarfare 23:52, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Reaffirming the fact that I think the steward body as a whole (at least those that were active) did not research enough before running a checkuser. NuclearWarfare 06:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    See above. Opposing Dungodung on what any steward would have done is absurd. bastique demandez! 19:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Bastique, I would be fine with Dungodung retaining stewardship. But there is no other place to really register my dislike for the checkuser, so I must do so here. If only those IRC chatmasks and logs were used as the basis for running the CU, I think we need a reexamination of our checkuser policies. NuclearWarfare 00:29, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support, active. Alex Pereira falaê 15:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove. In April 2008, Dungodung checked my FaWiki ID with another user and an IP, just based on a baseless request by user:Mardetanha (see [17] for details). I had almost forgotten that incident, until I saw the comment by Synergy. It seems to me that these two examples show a pattern, rather than a sporadic non-important error. Alefbe 19:44, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Yay, another troll. Thanks for the opinion. --FiliP × 19:50, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I believe this is a clear example of personal attack. Alefbe 19:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support, The incidents don't outweigh Dungodung's positive contributions. Kylu 20:47, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 04:03, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support ...Aurora... 13:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Hégésippe | ±Θ± 14:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --Meno25 01:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --Elijah/אליהו (Eliyahu)/إلياس (Ilyas) (Me!) 16:22, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Very active and helpful steward. --Millosh 13:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Shizhao 14:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Sebleouf 22:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep--BokicaK 07:59, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Effeietsanders[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: nl, en-2, de-1, fr-1, la-1
  • Personal info: In the past year I've been more and more busy with other Wikimedia related activities behind the screens (Wikimania, Wikimedia Netherlands, Wikimedia Conference Netherlands), and therefore my activity dropped unfortunately in the past year as a steward. A part of the reasonification behind this is however too that the work is quite perfectly being done by an existing group of stewards, so that when I take a look at the todo's, there doesn't seem to be much left for me to do. Therefore, I would not have huge problems with it if my inactivity would turn out to be a problem for reconfirmation. On the other side, I hope to be able to stay available for emergencies etc, still being able to help out when needed.

Comments about Effeietsanders[edit]

The following discussion is closed: Confirmed, no objections. —Pathoschild 02:04:54, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Support Support Lower activity, but helping in other Wikimedia areas is a good reason for not assisting as a steward as much... Majorly talk 00:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Not that active on wiki, but helping people out in IRC, a good steward, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support You're available sort of daily and very helpful. Thank you. --Thogo (talk) 01:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Less active than some of the others, but I see Effeitsanders around enough. A good second line steward, active enough for me. Prodego talk 03:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Effie thinks about the things some of us overlook and always has his head in the right place. Would miss his counsel on stewards-l. Do what you can to help and that's enough for me. ++Lar: t/c 04:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Confirm. Good work. MBisanz talk 06:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Absolutely helpful! Good work!!--Nick1915 - all you want 13:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support effe is still around to help when needed. Keep. Cbrown1023 talk 15:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Lower levels of activity than I like, but a recognition of your "unlogged contributions" leads me to say "keep"  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 16:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Keep --Fabexplosive The archive man 10:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support A very helpful and nice person which is very active on IRC, too. Confirm, of course. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Endorse. Keep up the good work. - Mailer Diablo 04:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Keep effe around. —Sean Whitton / 18:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --oscar 22:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Confirm. — Dan |talk 00:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support.--Jusjih 03:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support---Zyephyrus 22:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Dolledre 02:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Belongs to the team. - Wutsje 05:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support - Woudloper 11:23, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • support Thanks for the job you're doing. Finn Rindahl 12:32, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support, per above. Alex Pereira falaê 15:58, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 04:18, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support aleichem 11:37, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --Meno25 01:46, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep Partial inactivity compensated with strong work in other Wikimedian areas. --Millosh 13:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep--Shizhao 14:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep --FiliP × 17:38, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

guillom[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: fr, en-3, de-0.5
  • Personal info: I try to help and make myself useful as a steward when I'm around; I'd be happy to continue to serve the Wikimedia community. More info about me on my userpage.

Comments about guillom[edit]

The following discussion is closed: Confirmed. Nihil Obstat Effeietsanders 02:03, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jimbo Wales[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: en, de-2
  • Personal info: statement here

Comments about Jimbo Wales[edit]

The following discussion is closed: By Jimbo's request, the Board requested the creation of a founder group for Jimbo. He has been switched to that group accordingly.
  • I would say remove because of the silly business re. inactivity on meta, and lack of assistance as a steward. Of course, he should get this right as part of a staff group... Majorly talk 00:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove as steward, add as staff if he so requests. NuclearWarfare 00:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • You should rather be in the global staff group, which is more appropriate, since you are not active as a steward and also not regularly available on IRC. --Thogo (talk) 01:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • This steward, although perhaps more active in his other roles, ought to retain his stewardship. In my only interaction with him, he seemed knowledgeable and restrained. In other actions I've seen him take, and in actions he has declined to take, he seems judicious. He seems to have the best interests of the project in mind. It's hard to see why his hard work and contributions should be repaid with anything less than full-throated support. David in DC 01:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Full-throated support for adding "staff". Remove steward per Steward_policies#Inactivity. Wales will not lose any access, and this assignment makes much more sense. (And this is not the right forum to discuss the policies; To do so, please go to the appropriate page. ) Hillgentleman 01:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support for removing "steward" and adding "staff". --APPER 01:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry Jimbo - but so much people working hard in her/his jobs here. You're not a good example as steward. So you should not be a steward. Has nothing to do with you're person as "Father of Wikimedia". But this can't count here - not since thousands of people do a lot of work. An other way is shown. Marcus Cyron 01:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support staff. Romaine 02:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove steward for the higher level staff group. Prodego talk 03:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Uhm not sure why he should be added to the staff group because he isn't a staff, he is a board member and so he doesn't get paid. Staff members get paid and I don't think there is any member in the staff global list that is a current board member. Its better if he keeps this steward right instead.--Cometstyles 04:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    The "staff" right is designed for staffs and trustees, whoever needs it. NOt even every paid staff knows enough of MediaWiki to be able to use these tools. 220.142.9.87 05:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Please log in to comment. —Pathoschild 08:51:01, 08 February 2009 (UTC)
  • He shouldn't be a steward, both due to inactivity and his "higher" userrights. EVula // talk // // 05:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Jimbo Wales@enwiki has founder flag. steward and staff flags are not required.--Kwj2772 05:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove the steward flag (just because you are not a steward) and get a staff of founder one (if it does exist) :) --FollowTheMedia 11:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove steward, add staff/founder. Stifle 14:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I was wondering why Jimbo was a steward when he doesn't really use steward actions - discussion lead to the idea of steward being removed, and using the staff right. I agree to this idea, so remove steward and keep global staff. The Helpful One 15:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove steward. He seems quite inactive to me. -- Mercy (|) 16:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove steward, add staff or founder. :) --Ragimiri 16:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm unsure what to do here. Jimbo does take pseudo-steward actions for English Wikipedia. This wouldn't be allowed for a "normal" steward since it's his home project, however we allow it due to tradition. As well, he normally makes these actions on enwiki rather than on Meta. All in all, I don't see that Jimbo does very much for the wider community as a steward. However, he does have need to use the tools in his official capacity. I think (and I may change my mind!) that it'd be best to grant him staff access (which he should already have - I've not checked) and remove steward (but keep "Founder" access on enwiki since he has a special role for that community). I'd welcome others to poke holes in my thinking here.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 17:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    If we're going to be giving "Staff" to non-Staff members... I think we should rename the group to "Wikimedia" or "Foundation" with a link to the policy instead of foundation:Staff. Cbrown1023 talk 17:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I was also thinking about what impression it would give if Board members are automatically given such access. Are they then moderating content? Still thinking out loud...  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 17:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Exactly and for that reason its better if he stays in the steward group for now or we may have to come with a new global group "Board" and give them global "edit" right but not the "userrights" permission...--Cometstyles 21:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Cbrown, That's reasonable but a name is just a name. Cometstyles, everyone can edit everywhere with er global account. We have had that "developer" flag for a long time, and it isn't really about developing the software. Mike, What do you mean by "moderating content"? Remember "stewards don't decide"? Hillgentleman 00:55, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    No, I meant that giving Board members Steward-like powers might give the impression that they moderate content, which isn't the case.
    I think it would muddy the situation to add him to the staff global group, actually. As long as he's doing steward-y things for enwiki he should remain as a steward. In that case, I'd prefer to have the rights assigned to the Founder group on enwiki removed so he uses Meta for desysopings etc. I think there's no real issue letting him change rights on enwiki, given his unique relationship with that community.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 12:39, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove as steward, add as staff. Razorflame 21:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree with Cbrown here. It adds more confusion to add him to the Staff group as Jimmy is not part of Wikimedia's staff. --MZMcBride 21:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • No issues with keeping steward flag. --Charitwo 23:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Of all the possible options (Staff, Steward, etc), I think leaving him a steward is the best all around choice. MBisanz talk 03:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Replace with staff or founder flag. - Mailer Diablo 04:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • As above: remove and replace with staff due to inactivity. --Deon555 07:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Or you all could just leave the poor Jimbo alone. He's our founder, ffs. It's not important that he's inactive on the steward or whatever group. DarkoNeko 07:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Is there actually any reason to remove? It's never come up before; no need for it to be an issue now. —Sean Whitton / 18:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    He doesn't do any work at all as a steward, for one. Majorly talk 19:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The opposition to Jimbo Wales holding steward is boggling. Staff is not appropriate because it's strictly for paid staff of the foundation (and is generally granted and removed by me, and I have no authority over board member rights). I suggest people check their motives here. (I'm in favor of his keeping his steward rights, btw) bastique demandez! 18:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    The staff flag was originally proposed as something like the steward flag, but for official uses. Since when it came to be strictly for paid staff? Thank you. Hillgentleman 01:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    just beacause all the WMF staff is paid :) btw, it's not completely like steward flag--Nick1915 - all you want 01:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you but that is not a very satisfactory answer. Let us recall the original proposal for the staff flag: Requests_for_comments/Wikimedia_Foundation_staff_permissions

    In this proposal, as written, we simply add one more user group, "staff", which is given to those users who are either paid employees of the Wikimedia Foundation, a member of its Board of Trustees, an Officer, or are otherwise performing work on behalf of the Foundation as chosen and directed by the Board such as members of the Ombudsman commission.

    -- Hillgentleman 03:00, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support not keeping jimmy as steward is splitting hairs imho --oscar 22:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confirm -- I don't see why not. — Dan | talk 00:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confirm anyway.--Jusjih 03:06, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support ---Zyephyrus 22:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why not. There is no problem with keeping it.-- BlueDevil Talk 03:08, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the rights - can't really see any significant reason to think otherwise - Peripitus 10:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep the rights - Jimbo Wikipedia's founder. ~Innvs: 12:39, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confirm. I'm not sure I see the point in the current crusade on meta to take Jimmy's flags away. Personally, I've no desire to be at the forefront of the anti-Jimbo revolution. Avruch 00:15, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would support keeping Jimbo's flags. Symbolic actions have their place, but in this case the meaning would be completely unclear, the effects would be nonexistent (except perhaps for some possible nuisance depending on what Jimbo were trying to do), so what's the point? Chick Bowen 01:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, but for a perhaps-odd reason: There are, between the various thick layers of procedure and bureaucracy on WMF projects, still gaping holes where situations arise from time to time that need someone to have the right combination of charisma, following, and permissions to change what needs to be changed. Perhaps at times, we've had our faith shaken, and perhaps we've grown to the point where we think that the various interactions between projects are "fine", but as a regular here, I think it's safe to say that there is a significant lack of central guidance...other than Jimbo...that keeps the various projects glued together. Perhaps in the future, he can act as little more than a figurehead with a custom, ceremonial global right that does nothing, but at this moment we're still reliant on someone capable of stepping in when needed. Kylu 03:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove fr33kman t - c 05:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove the steward rights and add other rights (staff). The fact that Jimbo is wikipedia-co-founder is not a 'lifetime right' for the steward status, where he seems to be quite inactive. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 09:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Steward rights. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:27, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • As a relatively new member of the community: (1) I assume Mr. Wales has legitimate reason(s) for having the steward bit turned on. (2) There are cases where the why should not be articulated (e.g., some matters of security, but not limited to those). (3) It is my understanding we would not be discussing any of this if Mr. Wales had not performed the role he has performed, and therefore he has unlimited "credits" with respect to labors performed. (i.e., See #1) Proofreader77 10:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Obiously remove as a steward per blatant inactivity. Get the rights if you need them, give them back if you don't. There is no "he's Jimbo" exception. guillom 11:07, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Jimbo does some pseudo-steward things on enwiki no? I seem to recall he has removed admins for example.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 00:36, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    That is part of his "founder" (i.e. local steward) status. If the local en.wikipedia community tolerates Jimbo Wales's "benevolent dictatorship", fine for them. But his actions there (such as removing admins) cannot be considered as steward tasks; otherwise he would summarily lose his stewardship as a blatant violation of the steward policies (including Don't decide and Avoid conflicts of interest). guillom 14:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, I noted that in my comments above. A failure to recognize Jimmy's special relationship with (only) the English Wikipedia is just that: a failure. As long as he is doing that sort of thing for enwiki, I am comfortable with him staying on as a Steward (though I would prefer that such actions be taken on Meta).  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 17:40, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support per Avruch above. Woudloper 11:26, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support per Cary. Finn Rindahl 12:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral Em dúvida, he's Jimbo, but also inactive. :s Alex Pereira falaê 16:04, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support, per Bastique and Kylu. Alefbe 20:10, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral Neutral aleichem 11:41, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove the discrete steward bit. He holds steward rights (and all other rights) by virtue of the Founder bit, does he not? Or somesuch. Xdenizen 14:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Per Bastique - Wutsje 23:06, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Support for a gratuitous slap in Jimbo's face suggests the ultimate elevation of process over substance. It also suggests a level of cluelessness best captured by humorist Dave Barry when he once wrote of someone "[h]e couldn't find a clue if he was in the middle of a field of clues, during clue rutting season, doused in clue pheromones". I'm just sayin'. David in DC 12:36, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    POINT OF ORDER: That's not a Dave Barry quote. DS 21:58, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • remove per inactivity.--Bapti 15:53, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove --Guil2027 18:05, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • If can add him "Staff", then remove as Steward. Else have to keep as Steward. --Elijah/אליהו (Eliyahu)/إلياس (Ilyas) (Me!) 16:25, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Steward, replace with staff. Juliancolton 00:28, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove If he wants to help out, he can try his hand at editing. These privileges for Jimbo serve only to bolster his ego and do nothing to benefit the project. Everyking 06:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Remove I don't think that the Board members should have steward rights. Besides that, no expressed will (statement) to stay between stewards. If he needs steward rights for presentation purposes, I don't think that there will be any issue to give those rights to him temporary. But, again, he should express what does he want or need. --Millosh 13:16, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Keep - the "remove Jimbo's rights" movement we've occasionally seen just strikes me as egotistical and pointless. If Jimbo needs a flag to do something, he is going to have it and removing it just for the sake of doing so is pointless. --B 14:56, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • remove; maybe set a special global group just for him, whatever. --FiliP × 17:39, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Jon Harald Søby[edit]

logs: rights, globalauth, gblblock, gblrights, crosswiki | translate: translation help, statement

English:
  • Languages: no, nb, nn-3, en-3, da-2, sv-2, de-1, es-1, eo-1, eur-1
  • Personal info: I’ve been a steward since the beginning of 2006. I have not been as active as I would like the past year, due to a combination of other (newer) stewards being very efficient, and being busy with other obligations (both on and off wiki). I would, however, like to continue, and hopefully become more active than I have been lately.

Comments about Jon Harald Søby[edit]

The following discussion is closed: Confirmed. Nihil Obstat Effeietsanders 02:03, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fine for me. Majorly talk 00:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Slightly active in the SWMT-area, and doing a good job as a steward, thanks, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • You are nearly always available, always helpful, thank you. --Thogo (talk) 01:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Another of my 'second line' stewards, good enough for me. Prodego talk 03:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'second line'... interesting term but ya, it fits. Another steward whose counsel I value. ++Lar: t/c 04:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • COI - I'm also up for confirmation. Yes, I agree with the above. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 05:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confirm. Good work. MBisanz talk 06:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, very good and active steward--Nick1915 - all you want 13:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Jon Harald Søby is a very good steward. Currently, JHS is the only one who speaks scandinavian languages. Therefore, JHS should absolutely continue to be steward. Calandrella 14:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please, confirm per Lar —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 16:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Does good work - keep.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 17:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support for the "Scandinavian" steward. --Sir48 09:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep go Jon! --Fabexplosive The archive man 10:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • cf. Thogo. Regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support to confirm, -jkb- 14:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Coimeád - of course :) - Alison 19:42, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • --Kanonkas 23:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Endorse. Keep up the good work. - Mailer Diablo 04:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Super dooper Support - Best Steward I've had the pleasure of dealing with. No doubts whatsoever! Deon555 07:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confirm, no brainer. Xdenizen 12:27, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Endorse. Keep it up. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 19:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --oscar 22:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Confirm. — Dan |talk 00:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support --Meno25 00:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support.--Jusjih 03:07, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Support ---Zyephyrus 00:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Does good work and a great range of languages - from what I've see over the past years, fills the role admirably - Peripitus 10:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]