Steward requests/Checkuser

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
< Steward requests(Redirected from SRCU)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests and proposals Steward requests (Checkuser) latest archive
Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
{{Confirmed}}:  Confirmed {{MoreInfo}}: MoreInfo Additional information needed
{{Likely}}: Likely Likely {{Deferred}}: Deferred Deferred to
{{Possible}}: Possible Possible {{Completed}}: Completed Completed
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely Unlikely {{TakeNote}}: Note Note:
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated Unrelated {{Doing}}: Symbol wait.svg Doing...
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive Inconclusive {{StaleIP}}: Stale
{{Declined}}: Declined Declined {{Fishing}}: Fishing CheckUser is not for fishing
{{Pixiedust}}: Pixiedust CheckUser is not magic pixie dust {{8ball}}: 8ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
{{Duck}}:  It looks like a duck to me {{Crystalball}}: Crystalball CheckUser is not a crystal ball

This page is for requesting CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers (see also requesting checkuser access). Make sure to follow the following instructions, or your request may not be processed in a timely manner.

Before making a request:

  1. Make sure you have a good reason for the check. It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.
  2. Be specific in your reasons. Ambiguous or insufficient reasons will cause delays. Explain the disruption and why you believe the accounts are related, ideally using diff links or other evidence.
  3. Make sure there are no local checkusers.
  4. Please ensure that the check hasn't already been done:


How to make a request

How to make a request:

  • Place your request at the bottom of the section, using the template below (see also {{srcu}} help).
    === Username@xx.project ===
    {{CU request
     |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
     |language code   = 
     |project shortcut= 
     |user name1      = 
     |user name2      = 
     |user name3      = 
    <!-- Max 10 users -->
     |discussion      = [[Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
     |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
    }}
    

    For example:

    === Example@en.wikipedia ===
    {{CU request
     |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
     |language code   = en
     |project shortcut= w
     |user name1      = Example
     |user name2      = Foo
     |user name3      = Bar
    <!-- Max 10 users -->
     |discussion      = [[:w:en:Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
     |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
    }}
    
  • Specify the wiki(s) you want to perform the check on.
Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests[edit]

AgroDan@ro.wikipedia[edit]

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 23:41, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Group 1: Zgaba, TerciRO
  •  Confirmed Group 2: AgroDan, AleKJV, Barecode, EnergyPulse

  • Possible Possible Group 1 and Group 2 / Likely Likely Group 1 and Avram25.

From a technical point of view. This does not include verification of behavioral patterns or editing types. In judging sockpuppets, it is necessary to comprehensively look at behavior pattern or editing type. In the case of Possible Possible, it is recommended to decide based on the editing type and behavior pattern. If the edit type or behavior pattern matches, it is likely that the user. --Sotiale (talk) 00:09, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Angel X@hy.wikipedia[edit]

Symbol wait.svg Doing... --Sotiale (talk) 00:12, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
  •  Confirmed Angel X, Մալիա Հեյլ

From a technical point of view. @Sigma'am: I haven't done it all yet, but I'd like to ask you if the users' edit type and behavior pattern in the result below match. The result below is for reference only.

  •  Confirmed Group 1: Angel X, Մալիա Հեյլ, Լիդիա Մարտին, ԱրմինեՄնիկ
  •  Confirmed Group 2: SilViePink, Արեն Ձավարյան, Մարիամ Էվոյան, Դավթյան Դավիթ 13, Ֆավորիտ
  •  Confirmed Group 3: ArmSirius, Gevorg Ghazaryan, Nooberella, Sembeot
  •  Confirmed Group 4: Մուշեղ Մովսիսյան, Մարիետա Մովսեսյան, Անահիտ Ափինյան, Անետա Արզումանյան, ԱՆԷԴ Յան

  •  Confirmed Group 1, 2 and 3.
  • Likely Likely Group 2 and 4.

This is only technically confirmed. It may be that they are the same user, or there are other possibilities for this to happen. If the behavior patterns or edit types of these accounts match, I will investigate further. I guess there are more of these accounts. Please let me know after analyzing in your community. --Sotiale (talk) 01:43, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

@Sotiale:, thanks a lot, users in Group 2, Gruop 4 are from same wikiclubs. Users in Group 3 were in Wikicamp at same time. Please investigate Group 1 users, specially first 3, maybe all. There are behavior patterns or edit types of Group 1 accounts match:--Sigma'am (talk) 02:55, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
P.S. Please check also this edits.--Sigma'am (talk) 02:57, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

See also[edit]