Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2018-20/Recommendations/Harmonization Sprint

Overview

Recommendations

Implementation

Reports

FAQ

On September 20-22, members of the nine Wikimedia 2030 working groups met to harmonize the recommendations they have prepared in a year-long process of deliberation, consultation, and research. At the harmonization sprint, participants were looking beyond the work of their own groups, were working together to connect thematic areas and create a coherent set of recommendations. This set will be further worked on and subsequently consulted with diverse stakeholders.

If you would like to learn more about the findings of the Harmonization Sprint, please take a look at the narrative report. It presents a chronological narrative of key activities, main processes, major events, and discussion summaries. The report also presents three documents in the appendices that were generated over the three days.

Harmonization Sprint
20-22 September 2019, Tunis, Tunisia

• 
• 
• 
• 

Goal

Nine Wikimedia 2030 working groups have developed sets of recommendations for structural changes that will enable the movement to successfully advance in its strategic direction. The goal of harmonization sprint is to converge these nine sets of recommendations into one coherent set. During the event, higher level groups of recommendations covering multiple thematic areas were to be formed, and plans were to be collaboratively set for how to further develop these new groups or clusters, in consultation with different movement stakeholders.

Rationale

Amongst the thematic area recommendations, there are many overlaps and synergies, as well as gaps. However, they collectively strive to reach for the equity, inclusivity, diversity, transformation, and updated structures that align us with our Movement's strategic direction. The harmonization sprint presents a chance to bring these recommendations together and form new crosscutting groups of recommendations that can be further developed and later implemented.

Pre-Sprint versions of draft Recommendations

• Advocacy
• Capacity Building
• Community Health
• Diversity
• Partnerships
• Product & Technology
• Resource Allocation
• Revenue Streams
• Roles & Responsibilities

Venue

The Sprint took place in El Mouradi Gammarth, Les côtes de Carthage, Tunis, Tunisia.

Participants

Name	Representing	Region	Role
Alice Wiegand	Advocacy WG	Europe	Volunteer
Isla Haddow-Flood		Africa	Volunteer
Anna Mazgal		Europe	Staff
Nicola Zeuner	Capacity Building WG	Europe	Staff
Michal Lester		Asia	Staff
Sailesh Patnaik		Asia	Volunteer
Philip Kopetzky	Community Health WG	Europe	Volunteer
Sandra Rientjes		Europe	Staff
Mervat Salam		Asia	Volunteer
Marc Miquel-Ribé	Diversity WG	Europe	Volunteer
Jorge Vargas		Latin America	Staff
Camelia Boban		Europe	Volunteer
Andrea Patricia Kleiman	Partnerships WG	Latin America	Volunteer
Alek Tarkowski		Europe	Volunteer
John Cummings		Europe	Volunteer
Gergő Tisza	Product & Technology WG	North America	Volunteer
Matanya Moses		Asia	Volunteer
Franziska Heine		Europe	Staff
Daria Cybulska	Resource Allocation WG	Europe	Staff
Felix Nartey		Africa	Volunteer
John Andersson		Europe	Staff
Erina Mukuta	Roles & Responsibilities WG	Africa	Volunteer
Chris Keating		Europe	Volunteer
Anna Torres		Latin America	Staff
Caitlin Virtue	Revenue Streams WG	North America	Staff
Katherine Maher	Wikimedia Foundation	North America	Staff
Ryan Merkley		North America	Staff
Valerie D'Costa		North America	Staff
Delphine Menard		Europe	Staff
María Sefidari		Europe	Chair, Board of Trustees
Abraham Taherivand	Wikimedia Deutschland	Europe	Staff
Chuck Roslof	Wikimedia Foundation (Legal Team)	North America	Staff
Nicole Ebber	Core Team	Europe	Staff
Kaarel Vaidla		Europe	Staff
Tanveer Hasan		Asia	Staff
Mehrdad Pourzaki		North America	Staff
Abbad Diraneyya		Asia	Staff
Bhavesh Patel		Europe	Staff
Jonathan Dudding	Facilitators	Europe	ICA:UK
Orla Cronin		Europe	ICA:UK
Ann Lukens		Europe	ICA:UK

Broad clusters or "meta-recommendations" wre to be formed.

Between underlying ideas and daily activities.

Daily activities and notes

Below is a brief overview of daily activities, an extended report has been published on a separate subpage.

Day 1

Day 1 of the sprint was spent looking at and discussing the topics that are most predominant in the second iteration of the draft recommendations: building of capacity; roles and responsibilities; and diversity and inclusion, areas with the most input from across all recommendations. Groups representing one member from each working group were formed around each topic to review all related recommendations across thematic areas. They then looked at whether the recommendations were on a “principles” level, a “structures” level, or a “results” level. This was going to be taken forward to make a draft set of synthesized recommendations. However, it became apparent that even if recommendations were talking about a similar topic, aligning them at the level of structures is much more complicated than anticipated.

Day 2

On day 2, participants continued the focus on structures and what needs to be in place to deliver the Wikimedia 2030 vision and direction. But there was still a lack of clarity about this and no common agreement on structures. This led to discussions about principles and the fundamental concepts that should drive the recommendations before creating one coherent set could even begin.

Day 3

The work on day 3 centred on the need to have some serious conversations, based on the previous two days' events and process. The priority became discussing principles across the working groups and creating a sense that the recommendations are heading in the right direction, to bring about the structural changes that we envision for our inclusive and diverse movement. Like any event with Wikimedians, discussions didn't cease and there was no shortage of input :-) Passion was running high as well as alignment on principles that underlie the draft recommendations. Before the event ended, participants explored possible next steps, including how to shift the current structure of the working groups to a model with different roles that collaborate on developing a coherent set of recommendations.

The Movement Strategy core team is currently processing the large amount of information that was generated at the sprint and will be sharing outputs with the greater community soon.

• 

  Day 1

• 

  Day 2

• 

  Day 3