Talk:Flow/Developer test page

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Please test at [mw:Talk:Sandbox mw:Talk:Sandbox], instead. Thanks. (Board description edited by Quiddity (WMF) (talk), MZMcBride (talk), 192.195.83.38)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Why is this enabled here?[edit]

(Topic title edited by —MarcoAurelio, PiRSquared17 (talk))

I don't understand … PiRSquared17 (talk) 22:14, 2 November 2014 (UTC) (Edited by Vogone (talk))

Me neither! MF-W 22:46, 2 November 2014 (UTC) (Edited by Vogone (talk))

Now that's abuse. PiRSquared17 (talk) 23:08, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Page 1Page 2Page 3
<audio style="width:300px" poster="//bits.wikimedia.org/static-1.25wmf5/resources/assets/file-type-icons/fileicon-ogg.png" controls="" preload="none" class="kskin" data-durationhint="263.24045351474" data-disablecontrols="options,timedText">
Sorry, your browser either has JavaScript disabled or does not have any supported player.
You can download the clip or download a player to play the clip in your browser.</audio>
PiRSquared17 (talk) 23:05, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Cool! Courcelles 23:27, 2 November 2014 (UTC) (Edited by Vogone (talk))

I wanted to see how Flow dealt with a long score image and the resulting vorbis. When I edit the post I see weird stuff at the bottom:
:<span></span><div class="mediaContainer" style="position:relative;display:block;width:300px"><audio id="mwe_player_0" style="width:300px" poster="//bits.wikimedia.org/static-1.25wmf5/resources/assets/file-type-icons/fileicon-ogg.png" controls=[…] :
Strange. PiRSquared17 (talk) 00:50, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Re: the Score issue, I've filed bugzilla:72912. Thanks. Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 19:11, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Just, "Let it Flow, Let it Flow" ... :P Stemoc 03:14, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

This page was briefly enabled for testing in February, but then all the topics were deleted and it was fully-protected. I forgot that it had been unprotected, the month after. When I saw the 2 test topics here in August, I must have confused this page with Enwiki's identically titled page, else I would've investigated at the time.

I'd suggest fully-protecting this page, until later. (Probably in early 2015, I'll be more confident of re-discussing it all here; once some more design changes are made, and bugs are fixed, and features are added). I'll add a header, directing anyone curious to test at mediawiki instead. Thanks. Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 19:14, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

I protected this page now. MF-W 20:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)



The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.


The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
MarcoAurelio 16:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

This is awful[edit]

I think Wikimedia is about building content, and we shoud attract contributors with tools to better add knowledge to our sites, not to convert talk pages on facebook feeds. —MarcoAurelio 22:53, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

I agree with MarcoAurelio, as nearly all the time. MF-W 23:09, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Flow is still pretty rough, yeah. MZMcBride (talk) 12:47, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

At least it looks better than LiquidThreads. I think it still needs further development. I don't like, for example, those strange topic names, however I can understand that that way we avoid clases with duplicated titles. I'd like that deleted topics be shown for admins in a different color or something, so we know that those topics are deleted. Also, if this is used in a talk page, will we be able to archive the page, so the topic browser don't become very large? —MarcoAurelio 11:27, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

My first instinct was to "like" one of the comments above. 👍Like Google plus one.svg Oh I can do that too. Ya, this is not for us.

Also, the UI needs some work here, clicking on any option below (link + mention user) brings up a floating panel that seems hard to navigate away from. It seems like its trying to emulate a stripped down version of Facebook comment system. I wonder how this hide function works.....And we have topics instead of sub-pages that direct each topic in a separate page. :| Theo10011 (talk) 13:14, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

My, my... Those templates also here? I have RfD'd both. —MarcoAurelio 12:13, 24 December 2015 (UTC)



The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.