Talk:Wiki Project Med
- Please add new topics to the bottom of this page. Note: this is not the place to suggest changes to Wikipedia itself. If you have concerns or questions regarding medical content please post them on the talk page of the WikiProject Medicine in the appropriate language. English is here
Offline medical app in Chinese
Hello, why I can't add the name of my country in Participant demographics section? when I save the show this (Multiple translation unit markers for one translation unit.)?, thanks --Alaa :)..! 18:53, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- You mean here ? What country do you wish to add User:علاء Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:44, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Offline Medical App Launched in Arabic
In case anyone is curious and watching this talk page, there have been recent edits to Talk:Wiki_Project_Med/Archives/2016#Return_of_James_to_our_board. Others voted there recently, and I followed course. I just thought it would be proper to leave a note here just in case. Biosthmors (talk) 17:02, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
New project with Cochrane
This is innovative in the sense that it is a new sort of program but also routine in that it includes typical Wikipedia training with an established friend of Wiki Project Med. I think people here are already familiar with Cochrane.
2016-17 chapter election
There is discussion about a board appointment. Beyond that, the by-laws require an annual board election. This organization is due for an election.
I have told some Wiki Project Med members that I would draft an election process. I still would like to do that, but I have some challenges, and I wonder if anyone would volunteer to help.
The election should be by "members". There is some ambiguity of what constitutes a member and how they might be notified for an election. Assuming that we have a list of vote-eligible members, then there should be an election process.
I am not aware of any Wikimedia chapter which has documentation of an online election process. Wiki Project Med is an international online organization, so it requires a virtual election. In the past the chapter has had small email and phone officer appointment elections, but there is some demand to open up the organization to an easier and broader election process.
An obvious choice would be SecurePoll. This is the in-wiki voting system used for wiki elections, including Wikimedia Foundation board elections, English Wikipedia Arbitration committee elections, and the Meta-Wiki Steward Elections. As of now, all SecurePoll elections have been set up by WMF staff, and that election system is not available by request. It would be nice to use that system, because with SecurePoll, voting is restricted to people who have Wikipedia accounts. With any off-wiki system, that raises the challenge of confirming that votes are coming from people with Wikipedia accounts.
If we used an off-wiki option for an election, then I am not sure what system is best. SurveyMonkey is extremely popular but I am not sure it fits our need.
If I am left to my own, then eventually I will create a poll in some off-wiki system and draft some Wiki text to be mass-messaged to all members. This organization should probably have an election in October. Thoughts from anyone? In summary, here is what must be done:
- compile member list
- confirm voter criteria
- call for candidates
- set up off-wiki election tool
- mass message voters to visit election tool
- 2-week voting period
- count votes
- the current board makes appointments on basis of votes
Call for candidates for the board of the WPMEDF
Currently, the board of WPMEDF has 10 members and we are considering expanding it to 12. We are looking at running an election this fall / spring. Can all those interested in running in the board election please add their name below. Applications will be open for a month (closing Nov 22, 2016). Half will be elected for a two year term and half for a 4 year term.
- Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:13, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- CFCF 💌 📧 22:39, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- Shani Evenstein 15:04, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- Vinicius Siqueira (talk) 16:04, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- RexxS (talk)
- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 20:07, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keilana|Parlez ici 04:50, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
- Ocaasi (talk) 21:00, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
- harej (talk) 02:03, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
- Sydney Poore/FloNight (talk) 06:20, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- JFW (talk) 12:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Subas Chandra Rout (talk) 06:54, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
It might encourage those who are not already insiders to apply if you say what board membership involves. How often are the meetings held, where, what are the legal and practical preconditions to be a member, what legal fiduciary and financial obligations will a board member assume, what are the governing terms of the trust, how long is the term of office, ... Rogol Domedonfors (talk) 21:27, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
- We are looking at 2 and four year terms. With half the board seats standing for election every 2 years.
- The organization has no funding at this point in time. We are looking for active board members that will run projects as volunteers. If people are interested in working on grands through WPMEDF for specific project that would also be excellent.
- We meet formally once a year at Wikimania and then primarily communicate by email and on Wikipedia. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:40, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for that – it seems quite important for potential members to know what they are signing up for. Rogol Domedonfors (talk) 18:10, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Closing this election
I am serving as election coordinator. As described above this organization is due for an election. The nomination period for candidates closed on 22 November 2016. All of the nominated candidates meet the organization's criteria to stand for election.
For this term there are 12 candidates and there are 12 seats. The next step would normally be a member vote, but the voting process which would have been held would select the top 12 candidates on the ballot if an election were held as planned. Because the only possible outcome of an election would be to select all 12 candidates, as election coordinator, I am comfortable presenting this slate to the current board as the chosen board for the next term. The organization of a vote among members would be an exercise with no effect on the election outcome. I propose that the current board deem the election resolved by this outcome which is equivalent to the planned vote.
Going forward, I would like to ask the current board to either accept or reject this statement of 2016-17 election results -
- Formally raise the number of candidates from 10 as in the last term, to 12 this term, as mentioned here and discussed more off-wiki
- Each individual in this slate of candidates is eligible to stand for election
- The vote planned would accept 12 candidates on the ballot
- In this case, the vote can be skipped due to its having no bearing on the election's outcome
- The current term described in the by-laws is one year, but -
- As discussed, with these candidates the board is instituting a change in terms. 6 of these candidates will get a 4-year term, and 6 will get a 2 year term, as appointed by the new board when it comes to office.
- As always, elected candidates agree to keep the organization's by-laws
Membership elections remain important, but in this instance, the election can end without calling for all members to vote. The membership has had the usual and expected opportunity to engage in the election in this most central forum, and for this term, the membership is getting an election which is appropriate for the current level of member engagement and participation. Anyone who wants reform and more engaged elections for next term can make proposals for change and build more election infrastructure now.
- Bluerasberry, have you received legal advice to the effect that what you're proposing is actually permitted under New York law? (For what it's worth, my layman's reading of NPC § 703 suggests that, if the bylaws state that the board will be elected by the membership, then the board must be elected by the membership; the mere fact that such an election would not be competitive would not give the currently-serving board the authority to simply appoint a successor.) Kirill Lokshin (talk) 22:48, 29 November 2016 (UTC)