User talk:Bobo alcazar
Add topicWelcome to Meta!
[edit]Hello, Bobo alcazar. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum if you need help with something (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!
--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:49, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
the scope matters.
[edit]as far as i can see, things will go like this after lzh.wikisource established:
- there will be a big discussion to define the scope.
- the most talked-about topic would be if old chinese (according to your definition, works before ~500 BCE) will be included;
- other discussions will go around modern mixure of mandarin and old chinese;
- also ancient mixures such as 元杂剧 and so on.
- after you finish the discussion, entries that you want will be exported from zh.wikisource, and entries that you don't want will remain in zh.wikisource. 'dustbin' is a proper word to describe this situation.
if you insist that zh.wikisource will not be a dustbin, you should finish the scope of inclusion, and make zh.wikisource agree with your scope, before you start your wiki.
--DS-fax 06:55, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- 元雜劇 will not be included because it's Mandarin Chinese not Literary.
- I didn't say the Chinese before ~500 BCE is Literary Chinese.
- What's "old Chinese"??? I'm sorry, I don't know.
- Thank you. As you say, I should finish the scope of inclusion before the developing?
--Bobo alcazar (talk) 02:00, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- But should I give the inclusion before I develop French Wikisource. The inclusion discussion is just for few articles. If they wonder the inclusion, they can learn some knowledge about language, not ask me. I am not the authority of the linguistics community, and my words are not as rigorous as those linguists. Besides, please talk in Requests for new languages/Wikisource Literary Chinese. --Bobo alcazar (talk) 02:19, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Hat600: Please think above, thx. --Bobo alcazar (talk) 07:16, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
In your one comment of Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Literary_Chinese#Tentative_close, it seems that you mentioned this as "Literary Chinese", that's wrong point, those series of pages are written in Korean mixed script (Q711797), it's a kind of Korean texts, not Chinese texts. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:59, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- 您看其内容是纯汉文。--Bobo alcazar (talk) 14:26, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
希望閣下就中文維基文庫一項重大人事任免指引案發表己見，指引調整案現已出現兩個版本，正在膠著，如果兩案最終都未能通過而現有指引續存的話，則更有可能對中文維基文庫的發展不利，包括但不限於用戶流失，內容缺失等。我不強求閣下必須要支持哪個方案，僅做提醒。 Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:43, 5 April 2022 (UTC)