User talk:Mahitgar
Add topicदेवनागरी सदस्यनाम, stage I : informal consultations
[edit]एकजैसे नाम का निर्माण
[edit]एकजैसे नाम का निर्माण निम्नलिखीत तरिकोंसे हो सकता है. जिससे पढनेवाले व्यक्ती के मनमे दो अलग व्यक्ती एक ही समझ बैठनेकी गलती हो सकती है या संदिग्धता का माहौल तयार हो सकता है. ऐसा कमसे कम हो इस लिए किस प्रकार की निती होनी चाहीए ?
१) हलन्ताक्षर सदस्य:नितिन नामक सदस्य खाता होते हुए सदस्य:नितिन् ऐसा नाम निर्माण अभी संभव है.
२) ऱ्हस्व और दीर्घ मात्रांओसे नितिन यह शब्द नीतीन, नितीन, नीतिन ऐसे भी लिखा जा सकता है. वैसेही नुतन या नूतन ऐसे भी अलग अलग लिख सकते है.
- मोहित जी मैने युकेशजी के वार्ता पृष्ठ पर आपका संदेस देखा । यह जानकर मुझे खुशी हुई की आप हमारे समस्याका समाधान ढुंडरहे हैं । देवनागरी विकि नाम प्रयोग कर्ताओं में मै भी एक हुँ । पिछले ५ सोलों से मैं हिन्दी विकि, नेपाली विकि, के साथ ही अन्य विकि पर सम्पादन कररहा हुँ । मैंने पहिले अंग्रेजी विकिनाम से खाता बनाया था पर मुझे यीसका पासवर्ड याद नही रहा, यिसलिए मैने देवनागरी लिपिका प्रयोग करके नयाँ खाता बनाया आजतक मुझे यिस में कोही समस्या तो नही है । जहाँ तक मुझे पता है एक जैसे नामका उपयोग करने हेतु जब कोही दुसरा सदस्य मेरे नाम से खाता बनाता है तो अगर नाम मिलता जुलता दिखाइ देता हो तो विकिसे उसे दुसरा नाम रखने के लिए सूचना मिलता है, उसही समय नाम के पिछे एक अलग चिन्ह डाला जाए । जैसे की मेरा खाता राम प्रसाद जोशी के नाम से है तो कोही दुसरा मेरे ही नामका व्याक्ती विकि पर खाता बनावे तो राम प्रसाद जोशी (१) या किस ही भी चिन्ह का प्रयोग कर सकता है । --R.P.Joshi talk 07:08, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
उत्तर देने मे विलंब के लिए क्षमा प्रार्थी हुं. एकदम ही एक जैसा नाम है तो सॉफ्टवेअर रोकता है. मगर कोई व्यक्ती नया खाता रामप्रसाद जोशी, रामप्रसाद जोशि , राम प्रसाद जोशि, राम् प्रसाद जोशि, राम् प्रसाद् जोशि बनाएगा तो फिलहाल सॉफ्टवेअर इसे सहजतासे समज नही पाएगा जैसे की कोई राम प्रसाद् जोशी खाता बनाएगा तो बहोतकर बन जाएगा. राम प्रसाद जोशी और राम प्रसाद् जोशी मे अंतर कोई सहजता समझ नही पाएगा तो विभ्रमसी स्थिती हो सकती है.
आपकी आगे क्रमांक जोडने की सूचना अच्छी है लेकीन एक से तीन तक क्रमांक कोई लगाए तो भी कन्फ्यूजन बहोत कर बने रहेग. कन्फ्यूजन टालने के लिए मेरे खयालसे कमसे कम चार आंकडे जोडने चाहीए जैसे कि खाता तयार करने का वर्ष जोडा जा सकता है जैसे राम प्रसाद जोशी २०१४ तो इसका मतलब होगा २०१४ मे खाता तयार करने वाले राम प्रसाद जोशी और याद रखना भी आसान जाएगा.
दुसरा और एक तरीका आपका जो मुख्य विकि होगा उसके अद्याक्षर लिए जाए जैसे मराठी विकिपीडिया पर मै अधिकतर काम करता हुं तो साथ मे मवि जोडूंगा समझीए नेपाली विकिपीडियापर कोई गलती से राम प्रसाद् जोशी खाता गलती से बना देता है और कन्फ्यूज टालने के हिसाब से उन्हे दुसरा नाम देना है तो राम प्रसाद जोशी (नेवि) नेवि= नेपाली विकिपीडिया ऐसे बदलते है तो आपको और उन्हे दोनोको असुविधा कि स्थिती नही होगी.
Mahitgar (He who knows ,wants to know and and loves to keep others informed) (talk) 06:55, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Mailing list for global renamers
[edit]Dear global renamer,
We have created a mailing list for us to allow easy communication. Please subscribe here and send me or Trijnstel an email to confirm it is you requesting it. Additionally, you might be interested to know of the existance of the #wikimedia-renameconnect IRC channel where you are welcome to join. Should you have any questions, feel free to use my talk page.
Cordially, Savhñ 15:07, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Userpage
[edit]Hi, Mahitgar, there is something wrong with your userpage (on top), just wanted to inform you. Lotje (talk) 16:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Re: Request to use different template
[edit]Hi, thanks for the update.
- Why do you keep saying I used a bot when that's false and I already said that I didn't?
- Anyway, you are free to replace the template with a more specific one, of course. As copyright violations are speedy deletion targets everywhere and a different system would confuse users, I'd recommend simply transcluding your new template when {{delete}} is placed in "File" namespace, using a parser function.
--Nemo 08:29, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
@Nemo bis:
Well while my following reply happens to be lenthy, In brief what we will be doing is 1) we will be reducing the need of using it by non-Marathi people and over all also because we will be restricting local image intake substantially in time to come (with help of edit filters wherever necessary and possible) 2) Only delete-image template or the apropriate template will needed to be used but we shall include info about delete-image template in regular delete template just for information sake; but entire transclusion is not planned as of now. 3) For most text related issues of copyright or other wise edit filters clusture is advanced enough and now we do not have many instances where in non-marathi people need to use delete template.
Just to keep you informed in last few weeks I have taken lot of steps to sort out image related issues on mr-wikipedia and good number of steps are in pipe line. This communication with you was one of essential part of many other steps. Thanks for your support.
If you did not read content of w:mr:Template:Delete-image then I will suggest to do so.
- 1) When you placed template {{delete}} in mr-file namespace, were you not just un-aware of the meaning of marathi language notice in the given template ? if you had understanding of the same then nothing like that; As far as my understanding of Indian Copyright act goes, I have remained doubtfull, how far present language construct of the said template is legally tenable and usage there of. (And so as sysop it made those requests deficult to handle for me.) I prefer to handle routin administrative requests with a separate template and official copyright claims to be handled separately, It is both more as per the Indian law and convinience of sysop activity.
- 2) Unfortunately a delete template got placed on few such self made files where user has relinqushed his rights using Marathi language. Under Indian copyright act section 21 mere declaration of reliquishment is enough as far as law goes, and unfortunatley till recently we did not have any cc license templates easily available locally (now we have changed policy and imported a few usefull licences from commons and made using licences mandatory) but we ought to give more time to such files and users to regularise with licences as per new policy those can not and need not be placed for speedy deletion but will be dealt with, in due course of time and as earlier said we are planning a special campaign for the same.
- 3) Yes there are good number of files where you placed Delete template are due for deletion as a routin deletiona activity, some of them I deleted as much as possible to me, but as said above I was uncomfortable and avoidded to touch some (rest of) them with the given language construct of the said template and could not change without keepning you informed. With your above agreement to make necessary changes in language construct of the delete template I will be making necessary changes and adopt further course of action.
Warm regards
Mahitgar (He who knows ,wants to know and and loves to keep others informed) (talk) 09:50, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Re: Peer review
[edit]Hi, I saw your article. That looks great. You have been doing a wonderful job. Unfortunate enough that I don't know very much about this particular topic. --Tito☸Dutta 15:40, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- BTW, looks like you are an Indian. Did we meet somewhere? Really sorry but I often fail to relate usernames and real names unless those are directly related like Tito Dutta --> User:Titodutta. I met Narayan-ji, Subha, Nehal etc. from Sa Wiki and Santosh-ji etc. from Mr Wiki. --Tito☸Dutta 15:43, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Your RfA
[edit]Dear Mahitgar, I've just closed your RFA as not successful as there is clearly no consensus to grant you that permission. Feel free to try it later again. Regards, -Barras talk 16:46, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello; In this page, is over second closure for Nahuatl Wikipedia. Regards.--Marrovi (talk) 06:34, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Re:
[edit]Sorry, I missed your reply. Preventive blocks are never justified, please unblock Chinmayi, otherwise I'll likely have to do take the necessary actions by myself. While I can see many of your reasons (though some are definitely close to prejudice) this kind of behaviour is anything but inclusive. Nothwithstanding this I won't reverse Rohini's block now, but I think an rfc is more appropriate, focusing on the way things are handled rather than content of proposals. To be more clear the right way to contrast a "bad proposal" is telling why it is bad, not starting blocking anyone related to. Even worse, by hiding "bad proposals" to mr.wiki community your actually preventing them from being criticisited. --Vituzzu (talk) 12:41, 16 October 2017 (UTC)