Wikimedia Highlights

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Other languages:
العربية • ‎مصرى • ‎asturianu • ‎български • ‎Deutsch • ‎Ελληνικά • ‎English • ‎español • ‎français • ‎हिन्दी • ‎magyar • ‎Bahasa Indonesia • ‎italiano • ‎日本語 • ‎한국어 • ‎lietuvių • ‎मैथिली • ‎मराठी • ‎Bahasa Melayu • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎русский • ‎తెలుగు • ‎Türkçe • ‎українська • ‎Tiếng Việt • ‎中文

The monthly Wikimedia Highlights summarize the most notable WMF activities and other movement news from the Wikimedia blog. The intention is to provide value for those readers who might not have the time to read the entire blog, and to facilitate translations.

The Wikimedia Highlights were started in 2011 as a combination of the most notable aspects of the monthly Wikimedia Foundation report and the Wikimedia engineering report (including basic financial and traffic data) with a brief selection of other important events in the Wikimedia movement during that month. Following the growth of the Wikimedia blog in scope and coverage, and with the Foundation's reporting switching from a monthly to a quarterly publication schedule, the Wikimedia Highlights now (since the October 2014 issue) focus on summarizing news from the Wikimedia blog entirely.

Each new issue is posted on the movement-wide announcement list WikimediaAnnounce-l and on the blog of the Wikimedia Foundation (RSS). You can also subscribe here to get a summary message delivered to your user talk page on any Wikimedia project right after each issue is published.

Previous issues
Read the highlights in your own language (if available) or translate them.
June 2015 (blog version)
May 2015 (blog version)
April 2015 (blog version)
March 2015 (blog version)
February 2015 (blog version)
January 2015 (blog version)
December 2014 (blog version)
November 2014 (blog version)
October 2014 (blog version)
September 2014 (blog version)
August 2014 (blog version)
July 2014 (blog version)
June 2014 (blog version)
May 2014 (blog version)
April 2014 (blog version)
March 2014 (blog version)
February 2014 (blog version)
January 2014 (blog version)
December 2013 (blog version)
November 2013 (blog version)
October 2013 (blog version)
September 2013 (blog version)
August 2013 (blog version)
July 2013 (blog version)
June 2013 (blog version)
May 2013 (blog version)
April 2013 (blog version)
March 2013 (blog version)
February 2013 (blog version)
January 2013 (blog version)
December 2012 (blog version)
November 2012 (blog version)
October 2012 (blog version)
September 2012 (blog version)
August 2012 (blog version)
July 2012 (blog version)
June 2012 (blog version)
May 2012 (blog version)
April 2012 (blog version)
March 2012 (blog version)
February 2012 (blog version)
January 2012 (blog version)
December 2011 (blog version)
November 2011 (blog version)
October 2011 (blog version)
September 2011 (blog version)
Last issue


Wikimedia Highlights June 2015.jpg
"Geoffrey Bilder.jpg" by Helpameout, freely licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.; "Wreck of the U.S.M. steam ship "Arctic" (one-third-size).png" by James E. Buttersworth, Public domain.; "Green_Keys.jpg" by Hugh D’Andrade, from Electronic Frontier Foundation, freely licensed under CC BY 3.0.; "The Alamo at Night, San Antonio, Texas (2014-12-12 23.00.05 by Nan Palmero).jpg" by Nan Palmero, freely licensed under CC-by-SA 2.0; "Print Wikipedia by Michael Mandiberg, NYC June 18, 2015-34.jpg" by Victor Grigas, freely licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 Collage by Andrew Sherman

Here are the highlights from the Wikimedia blog in June 2015.

These Texans are on a quest to improve Wikipedia’s coverage of their state’s revolution[edit]

The Alamo at Night, San Antonio, Texas (2014-12-12 23.00.05 by Nan Palmero).jpg
The Alamo became a symbol for all Texans after most or all of its defenders were killed by the Mexican army. Photo by Nan Palmero, freely licensed under CC-by-SA 2.0.

Students in the United States and Mexico often learn about the history of the 1835/36 Texas Revolution. Two Wikipedia editors, Karanacs and Maile66, took it upon themselves to improve the encyclopedia's coverage of this history.

Over a three-month span, Karanacs and Maile66 worked together to develop the new article. Their plan of attack included scrapping the existing piece, all 5,243 words of it, and doing heavy in-depth research. Karanacs estimated that she spent over 300 hours reading academic literature, writing the article, and negotiating Wikipedia's peer-review process.

Securing access to Wikimedia sites with HTTPS[edit]

Green Keys.jpg
To ensure that Wikipedia users can share in the world’s knowledge more securely, the Wikimedia Foundation is implementing HTTPS, to encrypt all traffic on Wikimedia sites. Image by Hugh D’Andrade, from Electronic Frontier Foundation, freely licensed under CC BY 3.0.

To be truly free, access to knowledge must be secure and uncensored. The Wikimedia Foundation believes that you should be able to use Wikipedia and the Wikimedia sites without sacrificing privacy or safety. In June, it implemented HTTPS to encrypt all Wikimedia traffic.

The HTTPS protocol creates an encrypted connection between your computer and Wikimedia sites to ensure the security and integrity of data you transmit. Encryption makes it more difficult for governments and other third parties to monitor your traffic. It also makes it harder for Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to censor access to specific Wikipedia articles and other information.

7,473 volumes at 700 pages each: meet Print Wikipedia[edit]

An interview with Michael Mandiberg, the artist behind Print Wikipedia. You can also view the above video on YouTube and Vimeo
Video by Victor Grigas, freely licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

After six years of work, a lot of debugging, and more than a little help from his friends, Michael Mandiberg has created Print Wikipedia. It's a new artwork in which custom software transforms the entirety of the English-language Wikipedia into 7,473 volumes, and uploads them for print-on-demand.

It is important to note that Mandiberg has not printed out all of the books for the art exhibit, nor does he plan to. He has currently printed only a small percentage of them, which are helpful for visualizing the size of Wikipedia. It isn't necessary to print them all out; our imaginations can complete what is missing.

Record featured article author recommends five Wikipedia articles[edit]

Wreck of the U.S.M. steam ship "Arctic" (one-third-size).png
One of User:Wehwalt's five picks: The SS Arctic was an early Titanic-like disaster. Painting by James E. Buttersworth, Public domain.

'Wikipedia Picks' is a new content experiment for the Wikimedia blog. This weekly feature invites one member of the Wikipedia community to curate a list of five articles, images, or other content that they find interesting or important, in collaboration with our blog editors.

This article's guest host was Gary Greenbaum (Wehwalt), who has written 127 featured articles on the English Wikipedia, in whole or as part of a team—more than anyone else on the site. Over the past ten years, he has made nearly 100,000 edits. He selected five featured articles, three of which he personally worked on.

How English Wikipedia covered Caitlyn Jenner’s transition[edit]

Caitlyn Jenner, a famed US Olympic athlete and reality television star, completed her transition on June 1 and revealed it with a cover shoot in Vanity Fair. Wikipedia responded to this news in less than 30 minutes..

The news of Caitlyn Jenner's feature article in Vanity Fair quickly went viral around the Internet. But it brought conflict on how to address her. The conservative US magazine National Review asked “who won Bruce Jenner’s Olympic medals?”, and questioned how individuals should write about a new gender identity set against Jenner’s extensive history in a gendered sport.

English Wikipedia editors, however, had little conflict, in large part because of guidelines written during Chelsea Manning's transition in 2013. After thousands of bytes of text, a subsection of Wikipedia’s Manual of Style called “Identity” was edited to read, as of 1 June 2015:

An exception … is made for terms relating to gender identity. In such cases, Wikipedia favors self-designation, even when usage by reliable sources indicates otherwise. Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example “man/woman”, “waiter/waitress”, “chairman/chairwoman”) that reflect that person’s latest expressed gender self-identification. This applies in references to any phase of that person’s life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise.

Preserving Wikipedia citations for the future: Geoffrey Bilder[edit]

Geoffrey Bilder
Geoffrey Bilder is working to prevent the death of hyperlinks, also known as "link rot". Photo by Helpameout, freely licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

While hyperlinks have made the experience of reading printed text easier, they do have one major disadvantage: "link rot"—the demise of hyperlinks that no longer point to their original resource.

Geoffrey Bilder has spent 15 years in the scholarly communication industry and has used Wikipedia since the early 2000s. “What we are starting to realize is that a lot of the citation tools in Wikipedia have not been updated for a long time,” he says. “Since then we’ve been working on trying to get real-time feed of DOI citations from the all the different language Wikipedias.”


Andrew Sherman, Digital Communications Intern, Wikimedia Foundation