Steward requests/Bot status: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
Mjbmr (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 516: Line 516:
:It wasn't a problem on the template : you have bad fill it : "wiki" instead of "wikipedia" ! The correction is now done ;-) [[User:Toto Azéro|Toto Azéro]] 17:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
:It wasn't a problem on the template : you have bad fill it : "wiki" instead of "wikipedia" ! The correction is now done ;-) [[User:Toto Azéro|Toto Azéro]] 17:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
::{{done}} by [[User:Darkoneko|Darkoneko]] --[[User:Dferg|dferg]] <sup>[[User talk:Dferg|☎ talk]]</sup> 18:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
::{{done}} by [[User:Darkoneko|Darkoneko]] --[[User:Dferg|dferg]] <sup>[[User talk:Dferg|☎ talk]]</sup> 18:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

===iCEAGE bot@fawiktionary===
{{sr-request
|status =
|domain = fa.wiktionary
|user name = iCEAGE bot
|discussion= [[wikt:fa:ویکی‌واژه:نظرخواهی‌ها/ربات-۲۰۱۰-۱۲/کاربر:iCEAGE bot برای مجوز ربات]]
}}
Please grant flag to this bot, there is no bureaucrat and discussion was started on 29 Dec and was ended on 5 Jan, Thanks [[:User:Mjbmr|<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Mjbmr</span>]] <sup>[[:User Talk:mjbmr|<span style="color:red">Talk</span>]]</sup> 09:50, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


==Removal of bot status==
==Removal of bot status==

Revision as of 09:50, 7 January 2011

For bot status on MetaWiki, see the bot policy and request page.
Shortcut:
SRB
This page hosts requests for a bot flag on a Wikimedia wiki with no bureaucrats. Please read the instructions before posting a request. Do NOT post your request here until you get community approval (ie, don't list your bot here if you haven't consulted the local wiki for at least a week, or whatever local policies dictate).

Previous requests are archived.

Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Instructions

Before posting here

If there is a bureaucrat on the local wiki, please ask them to fulfill your request using Special:UserRights on the relevant wiki. Before requesting access here, make sure to obtain consensus on the local wiki if there is a community (see the index of request pages). If there is no local community, request on this page with a note to that effect. You can ask local bot flag directly here for some wikis in some cases (see automatic approval).

Remember to read the local project's bot policy. This should be linked from the local bot request page; a few are listed below. DO NOT post your request here without having fulfilled the local policies first, and having waited for at least a week to gauge community opinion.

Project Languages
Wikipedia

af an ar ast az bar bat-smg bcl be be-x-old bg bn br ca ce co cs da de dv en eo es eu fa fi fr frp frr ga gl hak he hi hif ht hu hy ia id ie ig io is it iu ja ka kab km ko krc ksh ku kw lad lb lmo ln lt lv map-bms mg mhr mr ms mt myv nap nds ne nl nv oc os pdc pl ps pt rmy ro ru si sk sl so sr su sq sv szl to tr uk uz vec vi vo wo wuu yi yo zea zh zh-classical zh-min-nan zh-yue

Wikisource

en it ru vi zh

Wiktionary

af br de en es fr fy ga gd gl id is it ka ko lt ms nl no ro tr uk vo wa zh

Wikibooks

cs de en es fr fy ko zh

Wikinews

ar en es fa fr ru tr

Wikiquote

en fr it ka ru zh

Wikiversity

en fr de it el

Wikimedia

Commons Meta Wikispecies

Making a request

  1. Place the following code at the bottom of the "Bot status requests" section below:
    ===Bot name@xxproject===
    {{sr-request
     |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
     |domain    = 
     |user name = 
     |discussion= 
    }}
    (your remarks) ~~~~
    

    You can use following form when applying global bot status:

    ===Global bot status for <yourbotname>===
    {{sr-request
     |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
     |domain    = global<!--don't change this line-->
     |user name = 
     |discussion= 
    }}
    (your remarks) ~~~~
    
  2. Fill in the values:
    • 'domain': the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
    • 'user name': the bot's user name (like "ExampleBot"). Leave it blank if you're requesting access for multiple bots.
    • 'discussion': a link to the local vote or discussion about the bot (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Bots#ExampleBot]]"). Notes: If there is no local vote or discussion, please say so below the template and explain why not. If there's no community, implement the standard bot policy instead.
  3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.


Global bot requests

Global bots are enabled on most wikis using the standard bot policy (see list of global bot wikis and global bot access requirements). Request will typically be left open for several days to allow comments. Please add requests at the bottom of this section.

Global bot status for EdoBot

Hello everyone. I have been operating EdoBot, an interwiki bot, intermittently for a couple of months now. I am a trusted bot operator, and as well as this bot I operate a number of others - DodoBot, MessageDeliveryBot and WelcomerBot on the English Wikipedia, and DodoBot on Commons (which runs a completely different task from the enWP bot, although inactive at the moment). I am also part of the Bot Approval Group on the English Wikipedia. - EdoDodo talk 16:15, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Your bot works since September 2010 and has bot access on 7 wikis. It has made more than 500 edits on only three projects. To my mind, your bot needs to have a botflag on a considerable number of wikis (including small wikis) and to have run on it more than 3 months to see a Global Botflag granted. I'm so forced to oppose this request, sorry. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 07:54, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, so I close your request. --Hercule 15:01, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Global bot status for Yobot

I am global user of AWB and admin in en.wiki. Yobot has bot status in en.wiki. I applied in pl:Wikipedia:Boty/Zgłoszenia and in pt:Wikipedia:Robôs/Pedidos_de_aprovação/pedidos#Yobot. I would like to do basic CHECKWIKI error fixes in all wikis, always after discussion in a local page. Most projects don't have a page of approval for WB so I could just run from my account as a bot but I want to avoid flooding and some editors asked me to do everything under a bot account.

If you think this is too much to ask, just approve me for pl.wiki, which everybody seems to agree but there is no bureaucrat there. -- Magioladitis 14:43, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The policy on global bots says that "the bot must only maintain interlanguage links or fix double-redirects" (emphasis not mine), so as far as I know, Yobot could not to be a global bot at the moment. - EdoDodo talk 14:56, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Global bot status is only for maintaining interwikis (see Bot_policy#Global_bots).
As you will only act after discussion with the communauty, you can make local requests for bot flag.
Regards --Hercule 14:59, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Thanks, Magioladitis 15:24, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot status requests

Please add new requests at the bottom of this section.

Bot operators making bulk requests, please consider helping implement the standard bot policy on small wikis to simplify and streamline the bulk request process.

Movses-bot@zh.wikipedia

Please, grant local bot status per automatic approval. --Movses 15:16, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Movses-bot@pt.wikipedia

Please, grant local bot status. I can't make 100 edits because it's restricted before I have bot flag. But they can't give me bot flag, because pt-wiki doesn't have bureaucrats and my request in pt-wiki can't be answered. There are some test edits of bot in pt-wiki. --Movses 04:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC) Movses 04:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

local policy says "You must wait for at least a week ...". You added your local request on December 12th. Merlissimo 06:24, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, yeah. My bad. What my action in that case ? Just wait one week ? Or I must add a new request 21-dec-2010 ?--Movses 12:21, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That period is refered to the test fase, that takes at least a week. If the stewards allow, you may start the tests. I can check the edits localy, and say if everithing is ok, that if the stew agree. Alchimista 10:40, 15 December 2010 (UTC) (per diff)[reply]

Wait Wait

Let's wait until the one-week test period is over. --Mercy 10:59, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Mercy, infortunelly i was wrong. The week i was talking was referring to the test phase, which starts only after a local crat gives permission to the test edits. Only now i saw that a change was made on the bot request page, but it has no support on local policies or was decided by community. I've opened a discussion to try solve the bots approval while we have no crats. My apologies to all of you. Alchimista 13:02, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The term in one week has ended. --Movses 23:57, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I ask you to stop the bot edits for now. We are discussing some changes on our local policy after the absence of crats. If it depends on a local approval, the flag can not be given at this moment, but I think we are not too far from a definition. Sorry about it.” TeleS (T PT @ C G) 19:08, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, now bot stopped. And I will wait again :-)--Movses 20:27, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DixonDBot@oc.wikipedia

Please, grant local bot status per automatic approval Regards, --DixonD 11:26, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DixonDBot@ia.wikipedia

Please, grant local bot status per automatic approval Regards, --DixonD 11:26, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yobot@pl.wikipedia

I am global user of AWB and admin in en.wiki. Yobot has bot status in en.wiki. I applied in pl:Wikipedia:Boty/Zgłoszenia. I would like to do basic CHECKWIKI error fixes. in all wikis. I was handed flood status and I could just run from my account as a bot but I want to avoid flooding and some editors asked me to do everything under a bot account. -- Magioladitis 15:26, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The Polish Wikipedia has their own bureaucrats to grant/remove flag bots to users. We are not allowed to help you with this. Just wait for a bureaucrat reply as the request page says. Regards, --dferg ☎ talk 18:10, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@wa.wikipedia

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 14:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC) P.S. : this and this show that automatic approval is OK. The template sr-request should be corrected :).[reply]

It wasn't a problem on the template : you have bad fill it : "wiki" instead of "wikipedia" ! The correction is now done ;-) Toto Azéro 17:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done DarkoNeko 20:48, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@ang.wikipedia

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 14:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC) P.S. : this and this show that automatic approval is OK. The template sr-request should be corrected :).[reply]

It wasn't a problem on the template : you have bad fill it : "wiki" instead of "wikipedia" ! The correction is now done ;-) Toto Azéro 17:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done --dferg ☎ talk 18:15, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@frp.wikipedia

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 14:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC) P.S. : this and this show that automatic approval is OK. The template sr-request should be corrected :).[reply]

It wasn't a problem on the template : you have bad fill it : "wiki" instead of "wikipedia" ! The correction is now done ;-) Toto Azéro 17:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done --dferg ☎ talk 18:25, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@bcl.wikipedia

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 14:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC) P.S. : this and this show that automatic approval is OK. The template sr-request should be corrected :).[reply]

It wasn't a problem on the template : you have bad fill it : "wiki" instead of "wikipedia" ! The correction is now done ;-) Toto Azéro 17:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Darkoneko --dferg ☎ talk 18:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@ay.wikipedia

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 14:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC) P.S. : this and this show that automatic approval is OK. The template sr-request should be corrected :).[reply]

It wasn't a problem on the template : you have bad fill it : "wiki" instead of "wikipedia" ! The correction is now done ;-) Toto Azéro 17:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Darkoneko --dferg ☎ talk 18:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@arc.wikipedia

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 14:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC) P.S. : this and this show that automatic approval is OK. The template sr-request should be corrected :).[reply]

It wasn't a problem on the template : you have bad fill it : "wiki" instead of "wikipedia" ! The correction is now done ;-) Toto Azéro 17:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Darkoneko --dferg ☎ talk 18:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@bar.wikipedia

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 14:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC) P.S. : this and this show that automatic approval is OK. The template sr-request should be corrected :).[reply]

It wasn't a problem on the template : you have bad fill it : "wiki" instead of "wikipedia" ! The correction is now done ;-) Toto Azéro 17:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Darkoneko --dferg ☎ talk 18:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@ckb.wikipedia

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 14:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC) P.S. : this and this show that automatic approval is OK. The template sr-request should be corrected :).[reply]

It wasn't a problem on the template : you have bad fill it : "wiki" instead of "wikipedia" ! The correction is now done ;-) Toto Azéro 17:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Darkoneko --dferg ☎ talk 18:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@diq.wikipedia

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 14:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC) P.S. : this and this show that automatic approval is OK. The template sr-request should be corrected :).[reply]

It wasn't a problem on the template : you have bad fill it : "wiki" instead of "wikipedia" ! The correction is now done ;-) Toto Azéro 17:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Darkoneko --dferg ☎ talk 18:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@csb.wikipedia

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 14:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC) P.S. : this and this show that automatic approval is OK. The template sr-request should be corrected :).[reply]

It wasn't a problem on the template : you have bad fill it : "wiki" instead of "wikipedia" ! The correction is now done ;-) Toto Azéro 17:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Darkoneko --dferg ☎ talk 18:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@fur.wikipedia

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 14:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC) P.S. : this and this show that automatic approval is OK. The template sr-request should be corrected :).[reply]

It wasn't a problem on the template : you have bad fill it : "wiki" instead of "wikipedia" ! The correction is now done ;-) Toto Azéro 17:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Darkoneko --dferg ☎ talk 18:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@av.wikipedia

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 14:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC) P.S. : this and this show that automatic approval is OK. The template sr-request should be corrected :).[reply]

It wasn't a problem on the template : you have bad fill it : "wiki" instead of "wikipedia" ! The correction is now done ;-) Toto Azéro 17:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Darkoneko --dferg ☎ talk 18:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@bo.wikipedia

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 14:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC) P.S. : this and this show that automatic approval is OK. The template sr-request should be corrected :).[reply]

It wasn't a problem on the template : you have bad fill it : "wiki" instead of "wikipedia" ! The correction is now done ;-) Toto Azéro 17:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Darkoneko --dferg ☎ talk 18:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@ext.wikipedia

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 14:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC) P.S. : this and this show that automatic approval is OK. The template sr-request should be corrected :).[reply]

It wasn't a problem on the template : you have bad fill it : "wiki" instead of "wikipedia" ! The correction is now done ;-) Toto Azéro 17:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Darkoneko --dferg ☎ talk 18:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@fj.wikipedia

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 14:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC) P.S. : this and this show that automatic approval is OK. The template sr-request should be corrected :).[reply]

It wasn't a problem on the template : you have bad fill it : "wiki" instead of "wikipedia" ! The correction is now done ;-) Toto Azéro 17:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Darkoneko --dferg ☎ talk 18:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@cbk-zam.wikipedia

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 14:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC) P.S. : this and this show that automatic approval is OK. The template sr-request should be corrected :).[reply]

It wasn't a problem on the template : you have bad fill it : "wiki" instead of "wikipedia" ! The correction is now done ;-) Toto Azéro 17:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Darkoneko --dferg ☎ talk 18:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ChuispastonBot@zh-classical.wikipedia

Automatic approval is allowed and my bot has already done more than 100 edits, and works on this wiki for more than one week (daily). Grimlock 14:03, 6 January 2011 (UTC) P.S. : this and this show that automatic approval is OK. The template sr-request should be corrected :).[reply]

It wasn't a problem on the template : you have bad fill it : "wiki" instead of "wikipedia" ! The correction is now done ;-) Toto Azéro 17:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done by Darkoneko --dferg ☎ talk 18:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

iCEAGE bot@fawiktionary

Please grant flag to this bot, there is no bureaucrat and discussion was started on 29 Dec and was ended on 5 Jan, Thanks Mjbmr Talk 09:50, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of bot status

If a specific user is abusing his/her bot status, you may request removal of the status on his account here. Please be sure to provide a short explanation on the current situation, along with links to the bot's contribution and an announcement in your community of the abuse. Previous requests are archived.

See also