Steward requests/Checkuser

Steward requests (Checkuser)

Shortcut: SRCU

Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
{{Confirmed}}: Confirmed	{{MoreInfo}}: Additional information needed
{{Likely}}: Likely	{{Deferred}}: Deferred to
{{Possible}}: Possible	{{Completed}}: Completed
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely	{{TakeNote}}: Note:
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated	{{Doing}}: Doing...
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive	{{StaleIP}}: Stale
{{Declined}}: Declined	{{Fishing}}: CheckUser is not for fishing
{{Pixiedust}}: CheckUser is not magic pixie dust	{{8ball}}: The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
{{Duck}}: It looks like a duck to me	{{Crystalball}}: CheckUser is not a crystal ball

This page is for requesting CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers (see also requesting checkuser access). Make sure to follow the following instructions, or your request may not be processed in a timely manner.

Before making a request:

Make sure you have a good reason for the check. It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.
Be specific in your reasons. Ambiguous or insufficient reasons will cause delays. Explain the disruption and why you believe the accounts are related, ideally using diff links or other evidence.
Make sure there are no local checkusers or policies.
- Wikimedia: meta • commons
- Wikipedia: ar • bs • ca • cs • da • de • en • es • fi • fr • he • hr • hu • id • it • ja • ml • nl • no • pl • pt • ro • ru • simple • sr • sv • th • tr • uk • vi • zh
- Wikibooks: en
- Wikinews: en
- Wikiquote: en
- Wikisource: en
- Wiktionary: en
Please ensure that the check hasn't already been done:

How to make a request

How to make a request:

Place your request at the bottom of the section, using the template below (see also {{srcu}} help).

=== Username@xx.project ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = 
 |project shortcut= 
 |user name1      = 
 |user name2      = 
 |user name3      = 
<!-- Max 10 users -->
 |discussion      = [[Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
 |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
}}

For example:

=== Example@en.wikipedia ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = en
 |project shortcut= w
 |user name1      = Example
 |user name2      = Foo
 |user name3      = Bar
<!-- Max 10 users -->
 |discussion      = [[:w:en:Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
 |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
}}

Specify the wiki(s) you want to perform the check on.

Crosswiki requests
CheckUser information Global blocks/locks Permissions (global) Permissions (bot) Permissions (other) Username changes Unified login conflict resolution Miscellaneous requests URL blacklisting Title/username blacklisting Vandalism reports
MetaWiki requests
CheckUser information Deletion Permissions Username changes

Requests[edit]

Lia 2013@hy.wikipedia[edit]

Status: Not done

List of Users: Parandjem (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); Paranjem (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); Ազատ Հայրենիք (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); 46.19.96.134 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)

CU log
Discussion: [1], [2]
Reason(s): Similar style edits, accounts only used to create CV-style pages for members of a minor political party. ― Teak (talk) 17:40, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

I don't see what a CU request will resolve. If the accounts are editing against policy then block them, if they are not, then what is the issue. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:19, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

The issue is whether the community has to waste energy and time on easing a newcomer into constructive wiki editing, or whether ban all the accounts, as it was already extensively explained to the original account holder what's what in the wikipedia (blanket banning newbie accounts is not practiced at hy.wiki). ― Teak (talk) 16:31, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Regardless of the justification of this request, the data are Stale. They are only preserved for 3 months, and Parandjem's last action was in February, Paranjem's on 12 March, and Ազատ Հայրենիք only has the registration in January. --MF-W 23:46, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

More spambots on MediaWiki.org[edit]

Status: Done

List of Users: JanetteRe (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); OPARobbin (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); DarrinMus (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); JanineTil (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); MindyFari (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); RonnieFla (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); COORosema (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); ElwoodTri (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); JulieM47 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)

CU log
Reason(s): User:Mathonius/Reports/Nothing to say about me really.

Also (couldn't fit into the template):

LonaZimme (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)

--Jasper Deng (talk) 21:06, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Done: mostly by Snowolf. :) Thanks for reporting, Mathonius (talk) 15:51, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Another spambot on Wikidata[edit]

Status: Done

List of Users: LilianaGa (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)

CU log
Reason(s): As before.--Jasper Deng (talk) 21:06, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Done. I assume Snowolf has taken care of this request. Mathonius (talk) 15:53, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Xil@lv.wikipedia[edit]

Status: Not done

List of Users: Xil (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); Anitaose (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); VikipēdijasPilsonis (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); Serps123 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); ĒteriskāFejiņa (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); M324 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); FireBlooD (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); Miner&Blaster (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)

CU log
Discussion: [3]
Reason(s): Xil looks like is sockpuppeting, because shes doing unconstrective edits and she spuuorts trolling being an andministrator. Please help us!!!!!--IMCOOLESTEVER (talk) 15:30, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Not done: no, sorry, but this is not the proper way to request a checkuser investigation: all you provide is a seemingly random list of accounts and unsubstantiated allegations of sockpuppet abuse. I see no reason to run a check on these users. Mathonius (talk) 15:45, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

D&S@pt.wiktionary[edit]

Status: Done

List of Users: Pacostein (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); Noddy (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); Renova (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); ‎Mecanismo (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); VitorAzBine (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); Stegop (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); Kaukáu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); Liuscomaes (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)

CU log
Reason(s): The banned user Diabo e Santo (see this request for more information) is on again creating sock puppets to disturb the project once more with poorly done edits and pages that need to be fixed (he does create some useful material together with his vandalism, so we can't just rollback and delete it all -- he is a smart vandal, not an easy one to fight). Please check if these accounts belong to the same user and if there are other sleepers waiting to be used. Thanks!

ValJor (talk) 10:12, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

These are Confirmed:
- Noddy
- Renova
- Kaukáu
- Solipsista
- Jaquinzinho
- Befa
- Almotacé
- Virissimo
- GrandeSuro
- Tasqueiro
- Liberto
- Tossan
- João do Telhado
Likely the same:
- Stegop
Unlikely
Mecanismo
Unrelated
- Pacostein (an admin on es.wiktionary)
- VitorAzBine
- LuisComaes

--MF-W 19:52, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Europefan@wikidata[edit]

Status: Done

List of Users: Europefan (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)

CU log
Discussion: Wikidata has no sock policy, but I believe it's assumed that using 24 accounts to edit is not okay globally.
Reason(s): Per w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Europefan, a user that has gone crosswiki, and one of the accounts is also blocked on de.wikipedia Special:CentralAuth/NeapleBerlina. User:Vituzzu has locked some accounts and done a CU at Meta. Rs chen 7754 22:05, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

No other accounts found. Actually not surprising, as the edits of the accounts on Wikidata only consist of adding interwiki links for the articles they created on enwiki; on the other hand there could have been sleepers (there are not).

I don't know (whether) this (is a) long-term abuser, but note that Special:CentralAuth/HeidelbergTurino is blocked on dewiki as a block evasion account of sulutil:Zombie433. --MF-W 18:35, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

중복세력@kowiki[edit]

Status: In progress.

List of Users: 중복세력 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); Minjujuui (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); 과학 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); 유체이탈영혼 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); ㅁㅈㅎ (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)

CU log
Reason(s): Minjujuui was blocked because his discussion pattern was identified as some sockpuppet's. He edited '대한민국 국가정보원 여론 조작 사건' documents. After block, 중복세력 appeared and edited it similarly. Another account is same, See it, it, it, it. document history is good for checking about it. Thank you, Sotiale (talk) 11:48, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Mirno@sh.wikipedia[edit]

Status: In progress.

List of Users: Donac (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); Nekako (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser); Oc Verder (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · Luxo's · checkuser)

CU log
Discussion: Example
Reason(s): The user makes changes to the articles where they were previously made as one of the top three of the blocked accounts. --Kolega2357 (talk) 16:57, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Possible abuse of multiple accounts. --Kolega2357 (talk) 16:58, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Steward requests/Checkuser

Contents

Requests[edit]

Lia 2013@hy.wikipedia[edit]

More spambots on MediaWiki.org[edit]

Another spambot on Wikidata[edit]

Xil@lv.wikipedia[edit]

D&S@pt.wiktionary[edit]

Europefan@wikidata[edit]

중복세력@kowiki[edit]

Mirno@sh.wikipedia[edit]

See also[edit]

Navigation menu

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

Actions

Search

Navigation

Community

Beyond the Web

Print/export

Toolbox