Steward requests/Checkuser

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

< Steward requests(Redirected from SRCU)
Jump to: navigation, search
←Requests and proposals Steward requests (Checkuser) latest archive→
Shortcut:
SRCU
This page allows you to request CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers. Please place your request at the bottom and be sure to specify the wiki on which you want the check to be performed using the format

===username@wiki===
*{{srcu|User name|language code|project shortcut}}
(please see usage first!). To request checkuser access, see Steward requests/Permissions.

Please do not ask us to run checks without good reason:

These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards, to allow easier at-a-glance reading of their notes, actions and comments.
Artículo bueno.svg Confirmed Symbol question.svg Additional information needed
Symbol support vote.svg Likely Symbol deferred.svg Deferred to
Symbol possible vote.svg Possible Symbol redirect vote.svg Completed
Symbol unlikely.svg Unlikely Symbol note.svg Note:
Symbol unrelated.svg Unrelated Symbol wait.svg Doing...
Symbol unsupport vote.svg Inconclusive Time2wait.svg Stale
Symbol declined.svg Declined Crystal 128 nofishing.png CheckUser is not for fishing
Pictogram voting delete.svg Unnecessary Nuvola gnome-fs-trash-full.svg Rejected
Pixie dust.png CheckUser is not magic pixie dust 8 ball icon.svg The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
Cyberduck icon.png It looks like a duck to me Crystalball.jpg CheckUser is not a crystal ball
  1. Running a check will only be done to combat disruption on one or more Wikimedia wikis.
    • Valid reasons for running a check include vandalism where a block of the underlying IP or IP range is needed, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption to one of more Wikimedia wikis.
  2. Requests to run a check with ambiguous reasoning will result in delays - please provide a rationale at the time you make the request
    • Show what the disruption to the project is, and why you believe the accounts are related.
  3. Requests to run a check on yourself will be declined
  4. Note that many projects have local CheckUser procedures, and requests for information on these wikis should be requested locally:
Crosswiki requests
MetaWiki requests

Contents

[edit] Requests

[edit] Vandals in ruwikibooks

The following discussion is closed.

These accounts are permanently vandalised pages of the project (starting from 6 of November). Please check them IP's and block these. Thank you. Regards, – Innv | d | s: 09:21, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Artículo bueno.svg Confirmed socks. Blocked their IPs and a couple of sleepers. Laaknor 10:14, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] wikt:ja:User:イロイロモンケーケー

The following discussion is closed: EMPIS or #wikt:ja:User:きこうでんみさ& wikibooks:ja:User:ゲーヨッパラシーザーetc.

Please check this account:

I suspect he is a sockpuppet of EMPIS or きこうでんみさ. They have same naming tendency, nonsense katakana, nonsense edits. Best regards,--Ninomy 02:23, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Steward_requests/Checkuser/2008#wikt:ja:User:EMPIS

[edit] Bahasa Melayu Wiki (MS)

The following discussion is closed.
Suspected related users

Previously as (diff IP)

Rationale

I suspect he is the same user (with diff IP) as

as same mode of vandal to same articles. Yosri 08:58, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

What do you need the Checkuser information for? If he is vandalizing, you can block him whether or not it is the same vandal, no? - Andre Engels 09:40, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
He keeps registering as new user; as such I need to block his IP address. I cannot afford to keep undo his vandal as he strike at any time, when the SYSOP is not active. I definitely can block him if he agreed to vandal only specific time when the sysop is around; say 9 am to 7pm. Unless I have the option to block specific sentences. Yosri 12:45, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, maybe I did not explain myself. If I block his user, his IP is block only for 24 hours, then he can register as new user. As such, I need to nick his IP address. Or anyone.Yosri 13:01, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Artículo bueno.svg Confirmed: Posteitaliana, Yotambien, Sambalbelacan, Rbssa, Seniledementia, Guapo, Aims, Dtrb, Gablv, Hathaway, Jojambu, Berkshire, Bamboo
  • IPs will be shared privately.
 — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 17:31, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] zh:User:Loh6303

The following discussion is closed.

At zh:Wikipedia:頁面存廢討論/記錄/2009/10/27 the following accounts without any edits just vote to keep zh:User:Loh6303's article.

I suspect it is abuse of multi-accounts in voting. Please check, thanks. --Kegns 08:00, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

One more:
--Jimmy xu wrk 14:07, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Symbol unlikely.svg Unlikely I have not checked all of them, but from what I did check, I see no similarities beyond all being from Taiwan. - Andre Engels 09:38, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Requests of ko.wiki

The following discussion is closed: not done

I suspect below accounts is same user. Because this user is vandalised on same page. this user's vandal is libels on w:ko:포켓몬스터(Pocket Monster).

evidence is [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] etc...

and, this user is Vandalize on some user's page(especially 베이징's user page), even This account even create to bid a abuse.

thus, I'd like below accounts and more accounts that are confirmed.

--Zerostone5482 05:18, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

all those accounts above were blocked by Korean wikipedia administrators, so there's no need to use checkuser right.--Hun99 06:58, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Rodolero or copycat trolling in nn.wikipedia

The following discussion is closed.

There has been some new accounts made by the rodolero troll or copycat on nn.wikipedia now. This troll was pestering mainly the Norwegian wikis some time back, but also other wikis I belive. Can you check if there are any more accounts than these obvious ones from today:

Thank you. --Jorunn 19:35, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Usually this kind of request is difficult. If they don't have edits, you can't tell, if the username is not offending or impersonating, that this is the vandal. (You know, fishing is not allowed.) But here are the results that can be traced back to the vandal:
There are two more accounts that seem to be the same person, but it is not absolutely certain, therefore I won't list them here. --თოგო (D) 13:21, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Sdee@zh.wikipedia

I suspect those two accounts are the same person because:

  1. w:zh:user:Akimotokenta made grammar mistakes to the article w:zh:何思謙(see [6]). I reverted that but later w:zh:user:Sdee brought back the grammar-mistake version and wrote the summary as "user:Akimotokenta 編輯合理，無需回退。" (Translation: "user:Akimotokenta's version is reasonable, so no need to revert.")(see [7]). Next I reverted that again.
  2. Akimotokenta added speedy deletion template to the article w:zh:吳國昌(see [8]), but it is clear that the article does not match zh.wikipedia's Criteria For Speedy Deletion, so w:zh:user:An Macanese reverted that. However, Sdee later added back the speedy deletion template and wrote the summary as "該用戶提出不嘗不是道理..."(Translation: "That user(Akimotokenta)'s request is not unreasonable...")(see [9]). Finally I reverted that again.
  3. In "Did you know?" nomination of zh.wikipedia, Akimotokenta voted a "support" to Sdee's nomination. (see [10], Akimotokenta voted {{支持}}(which means "support") to the nomination "澳門歷史城區哪座建築物曾是明朝時宣讀政府命令的場所？（擴建條目；澳門政權移交10週年系列條目）—TINHO 2009年11月7日 (六) 09:37 (UTC) ", in which "TINHO" is the signature of Sdee here)

For the above reasons, I suspect that user:Sdee, by utilizing user:Akimotokenta, made vandals to the articles and is supporting himself in his nomination. Please check ASAP as the nomination will end tomorrow, thanks very much. --CDIP No.150 repair meter 09:05, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

  • Artículo bueno.svg Confirmed Sdee == Akimotokenta  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 17:38, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Re-opened pending another steward double-checking my results.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 14:58, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
I double-checked, and I also come to the same result of Artículo bueno.svg Confirmed. --თოგო (D) 17:14, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Totally disagree with the judgement with the reason that this is toally unfair and unreasonable. (Please see apendenix 1 and apendenix 2 in the user talk pages as my reasons for objection and refer to the declearation letter by user:akimotokenta.) --AG0ST1NH0 18:50, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Vandal at vi.wikipedia.org

This is vandalism accounts we suspect that created by user vi:User:Minh râu (this name mean Ho Chi Minh have bushy beard). There are obscene names in Vietnamese language. Him usually create accounts from 10:00pm to 23:00pm (GMT+7). Please check them IP's and block these. Thank you.--Magicknight94 01:13, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Range 79.107.0.0/17 on elwiki

79.107.0.0/17 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · VVV's · Luxo's · checkuser) Vandalising a bunch of pages on el.wiki, if a steward could check for collateral damage from this range that'd be great. GrooveDog 02:03, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] See also


Requests for: permissions (global) — bot status — CheckUser information (local) — deletion (speedy deletions: local | multilingual) — translation — logos — URL blacklisting — username changes (local) — SUL problem solving — new languages — adminship on Meta — comments — interwiki map — an account on WMF wiki — help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat


Retrieved from "http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Checkuser"