Steward requests/Checkuser
From Meta
- To request checkuser access, see Requests for permissions.
| ←Requests and proposals | Steward requests (Checkuser) | Latest archive→ |
|
This page allows you to request checkuser information on a wiki with no local checkusers. Make sure to specify the wiki on which you want the check to be performed. Note that many projects have local checkuser procedures, and checkuser information on these wikis should be requested locally; see also the Steward handbook.
Please use headers in the format "username@wiki", such as "billy@enwikisource". Local checkuser request pages: |
| Crosswiki requests |
|---|
| MetaWiki requests |
Contents |
[edit] Requests
[edit] Antal@itwikiquote
Please check if he is a sockpuppet of q:it:Orroz; last usernames q:it:Amarsi_Marsia, q:it:Red_Women, q:it:Minnesota_Boy; further usernames and IP ranges here. I suspect him because he added unsourced quotations with possibly false sources (proverbs), and an anonymous user with an IP of Orroz's wrote «he's certainly another transformation of Orroz». Thank you, Nemo 23:47, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Inconclusive, Orroz is too old to check btw. Maybe Orroz just wants to make him look bad, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 14:30, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
-
- Orroz's socks have recent edits. Check them, please. --Nemo 02:34, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Salamander03@kowikipedia and 김희구천재샐러맨더개새@kowikipedia
rlagmrn4u@kowikipedia said salamander03 and 김희구천재샐러맨더개새 are same person. I feel tight. I want to clear myself of the false charge. pleas check. Salamander03 11:25, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Note that while CheckUser tool can provide generally conclusive evidence that there is sockpuppetry involved, it cannot always serve as a measure for determining whether two (or more) users aren't sockpuppets of one another. It can give some results but they can never be 100% accurate, because there are numerous ways of getting around the tool and the processes. --FiliP × 11:31, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Ok. I'm sorry. And rlagmlrn4u said that now he believe me. thank you. I'm sorry for this request. bye! Salamander03 00:06, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Frenchbotowner @ sv.wiktionary
It is Wonderfool and I am looking for an IP to crosscheck with en.wiktionary in our ongoing sockhunt. - TheDaveRoss 22:27, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Done, IP address sent privately. (TheDaveRoss is an en-Wiktionary checkuser.) —{admin} Pathoschild 22:30:47, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Benutzer:Weissmann@de.wikinews and IP 89.149.244.184
Concerning the one day block of Benutzer:Weissmann at de.wikinews (22 Aug 2008), the user Weissmann left de.wikinews and there occurred suddenly the IP 89.149.244.184 (contributions) claiming that Benutzer:Franz who did the block had abused his sysop rights and also made an entry on a user page of user Berliner Schildkröte who had been proposed by Benutzer:Franz for a possible candidate to become an administrator at de.wikinews. Could you please check if there is a connection between the two of them?
It would also be good to know whether there is no connection with IP 89.149.244.184 and Benutzer:Berliner Schildkröte@de.wikinews, but since it is not possible to really exclude connections I will probably not ask for it, at least if the first case (which I think is more likely to show a connection) should have a "positive" result.
--Angela H. 10:17, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hello Angela, I must say I would tend to mark this as
Declined it is not forbidden to edit logged out and the IP seems not to have used it to vandalize or edited while that user was blocked. Atm. I don't see a good ground for a check, also I must say I can't see the problem, the IP even edited the userpage of the Schildkröte, so it just seems it is him, I would just assume he got logged out or if he does this intentionally contact him in private and try to explain to him, that this is not an exceptable behaviour if he wants to express his opinion he should stand to his words and not hiding behind an IP (that is what I think personally). Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| ∇ 14:11, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
-
- Hello, Spacebirdy! Thank you for your reply. I could explain more about my reasons for not thinking that it is User:Berliner Schildkröte, but maybe we should first wait and see what else the IP and the other users mentioned here are doing at de.wikinews or not, and come back here if necessary. Regards, --Angela H. 14:39, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
-
- Now, i would like to add another username to that picture and that is HoH@dewikinews. This account was created a few days after user Weissmann was blocked. It was then used for some minor edits and on the next day out of sudden started a new discussion on our Pressestammtisch about the block (which was then 4 days ago). While its not impossible it seems unlikely that this would be a really new user. Now Weissmann is apparently known for creating tons of sockpuppets, so this might be one of his speaking in favor of himself. I believe using a sockpuppet to create the illusion of support for a position is considered sockpuppet abuse so in result i believe the checkuser policy allows to check if HoH@dewikinews and Weissmann@dewikinews are the same person. I therefore request to do this check. -- Kju 18:19, 28 August 2008 (UTC) (PS: One interesting detail i just noticed: User Weissmann requested deactivation of his account a few hours before HoH's first edit. That might be a coincidence as well, but it makes the case even more suspect) -- Kju 18:35, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
- JFTR: 89.149.244.184 is a proxy server which is blocked at english wikipedia. I have now blocked it a german wikinews as well. So there is no point in checkuser with that ip. -- Kju 18:46, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
[edit] ko:정우익3and ko:Daco
Concerning similar subsequent damages done to one article(ko:이승만), I want to check whether these two users are the same.Vnvnfls 04:17, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
