Community Tech/Community Wishlist Survey description

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Posted: 2016 Community Wishlist Results

The Community Tech team is focused on meeting the needs of active Wikimedia editors for improved, expert-focused curation and moderation tools. The creation of the Community Tech team is a direct outcome of requests from core contributors for improved support for moderation tools, bots, and the other features that help the Wikimedia projects succeed.

In November, 2015, Community Tech will conducted the first cross-project Community Wishlist survey, to help identify the features and fixes that are most important to Wikimedia editors. We invited contributors from all Wikimedia projects to submit proposals for the Community Tech team. After two weeks of collecting proposals, we asked them to vote on the proposals they were most interested in. The proposals with the highest votes became the team's top priority backlog to investigate and address. We were happy enough with the process to repeat it in 2016 and plan to do so again towards the end of 2017.

Rationale[edit]

We realize there are many existing community wishlists; however, most of them have not been sorted/prioritized by the community, many are out-of-date, and most of them do not have a clearly defined scope for the requests. In addition, we do not know of any technical request surveys that have actively engaged a large number of Wikimedia projects.

Outreach[edit]

The team like to get input from as many editors and as many communities as possible. To accomplish that, we work with the Community Engagement team and the Communications team to formulate an outreach strategy. This strategy may involves blog posts, site notices, talk page invitations, Village Pump notices, mailing list posts, Tech News, IRC, social media and other venues.

Venue[edit]

The survey itself is conducted on Meta. There are several reasons for having the survey on-wiki instead of using a third-party survey tool:

  • Editors are by definition comfortable using wikis and often prefer the transparency and flexibility of wikis over more specialized software. The community itself almost always conducts surveys and polls on-wiki, even for relatively complex polls such as Picture of the Year.
  • Wikis easily facilitate simultaneous discussion and voting.
  • Translation of proposals can be more easily handled by community volunteers if they are on-wiki.

Scope[edit]

Requests should ideally align with the scope of the Community Tech team. In particular, they should be discrete, well-defined tasks that will directly benefit the core community. Tasks that are outside of that scope may be declined or referred to other development teams.

Participation requirements[edit]

In order to participate in the survey (by submitting proposals, endorsing proposals, or voting), a user must have a registered account, with good-faith edits prior to the start of the survey, or be an active Tool Labs developer. Anyone, including anonymous IP users, can participate in discussion, however. Cross-wiki edit counts can be verified at Special:CentralAuth.

Phase 1: Submitting proposals[edit]

In the first phase of the survey, we are soliciting proposals for technical requests. Proposals are limited to three per person. The community is be encouraged to organize, discuss, and debate the proposals throughout the first phase of the survey. As proposals are made, the Community Tech team may offer feedback on a proposal's technical feasibility and whether or not it fits the scope of the team’s work. A proposal that duplicates or conflicts with items on another WMF team's roadmap may be flagged by the Community Tech team, and not included in the voting phase. This can also happen to items that are not technical requests but e.g. policy discussions, items we know we won't be able to do, or proposals that we simply do not understand and where the proposer doesn't respond to requests for clarification.

While most of this process will be conducted in English, we are inviting people from any Wikimedia project to submit proposals. We will be soliciting volunteer translators, to help translate the proposal into English.

Format of proposals[edit]

Proposals may be submitted in any language, but English is encouraged (in order to facilitate feedback from the Community Tech team and other editors). Ideally your proposal should concisely address the following points:

  • What is the problem you want to solve?
  • Which users would benefit? (editors, admins, Commons users, Wikipedia users, etc.)
  • How is this problem being addressed now?
  • What are the proposed solutions? (if there are any ideas)
  • Are there any relevant Phabricator tasks?

Phase 2: Reviewing and organizing proposals[edit]

During the second phase, the Community Tech team and the Technical Collaboration team go through the proposals. We organize them, ask for clarifications, merge duplicates and try to get the proposals in as good shape as possible prior to the voting phase so that editors will know what they are voting for, and make sure the proposal is clear on what the benefits would be. Some proposals that are out of scope, not technical requests or impossible for us to work on are archived.

Phase 3: Voting[edit]

During the voting phase, editors vote on which submissions they would most like the Community Tech team to work on. Positive votes marked with Support Support and signature will be counted as the proposal's tally. Comments marked Neutral or Oppose are acceptable, in order to ask clarifying questions or raise potential problems for discussion, but they will not be counted as negative votes.

When the voting has concluded, the top 10 requests with the most Support votes will be copied to a new wiki page, along with their final vote tallies.

Analysis and prioritization[edit]

Each of the top 10 requests will be evaluated for prioritization by the Community Tech team according to the following criteria:

  • Support
    • How many votes did it get in the survey?
    • Do discussions show consensus for the request?
    • If the task involves working on an existing codebase, are the current maintainers open to us modifying or forking their code?
  • Feasibility
    • How much work is involved?
    • Are there any blockers?
    • Does our team have the necessary knowledge to accomplish the task in a timely manner?
  • Impact
    • How many wiki projects will this benefit?
    • How many editors will this benefit?
    • Will it be a long-lasting solution (or just a temporary fix)?
    • How much will this improve the efficiency and happiness of the communities?
    • Is there existing software that can cover this need? (or software that is already being developed)
  • Risk
    • Are there any potential drawbacks or difficulties?
    • Does it negatively affect any group of editors?
    • Is the task well defined with a clear scope? (i.e. does it have defined acceptance criteria)

Once analysis is complete, a priority will be assigned to the task by the Community Tech team (high, normal, or low).

Development[edit]

As each request advances through the development process, its status will be updated on the wiki page allowing the community to easily monitor the team’s progress and offer feedback.

A parallel Phabricator workboard called Community-Wishlist-Survey has been created. This workboard will contain task cards for each of the top ten requests. The purpose of this workboard will be to facilitate internal work organization and discussion of the requests by the team (although community members will also be welcome to participate in the Phabricator discussions).

We also work on some requests that didn't make the top ten but are very relevant to smaller projects, though our main focus will be on the top ten.

The Technical Collaboration team is working with volunteer developers and others to try to address popular requests on the wishlist that didn't make it to the top ten.