Grants:IdeaLab/Статус эксперта по редактуре и компилированию / Literary Editor (Expert) status

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
statusDRAFT
Статус эксперта по редактуре и компилированию
Introducing the Literary Editor (Expert) status and related instruments
targetRussian Wikipedia first place, other language versions in case of success
strategic priorityImprove quality
start dateMay 1
start year2016
end dateMay 1
end year2017
budget (local currency)3400000 RUR
budget (USD)50000
grant typeIndividual
non-profit statusNo
creatorLevminikes
contact(s)• leader@liderstvo.ru
created on17:19, Sunday, March 20, 2016 (UTC)


Project idea[edit]

What is the problem you're trying to solve?[edit]

1. From time to time I come across structural issues within the individual Wikipedia articles and between articles belonging to the same topic / field. These include, for example: illogical article structure; controversial content within the same article or between related articles; ungrounded repeting content in different related articles; content which does not match the theme of this particular article, and would rather be included in another (related) article; etc.

2. The literary / stylistic quality of some articles, in my experience, also leaves a little to be desired.

Sometimes these drawbacks seem to be the result of different contributors working on the same article / topic, with poor coordination between the newer and older material; sometimes they seem to be the result of Wikipedia contributors being interested in their subject matter more then in literary and structural quality of the articles they edit.

To my mind, these issues may be lessening the quality of experience the Wikipedia users get, and lessening Wikipedia's prestige. Besides, we may just be losing those users who are susceptible to literary sophistication.

What is your solution?[edit]

Introducing the concept of literary editing and structural improvement, equipped with relevant procedures and instruments, might be a way to solve the issues outlined above. The Literary Experts' task would be to literary edit and re-structure articles (no interference in content issues, no changes altering the meaning of what is written!), and also to reorganize material between overlapping (related) articles within the same field / topic. These Experts should also be responsible for highlighting (by means of special remarks possibly?) the contradicting content in case it is found within an individual article or between related articles.

Project goals[edit]

The positive results would be:

1) Better structure and higher literary quality of individual Wikipedia articles

1) Better structured information within each field / topic. For example, less repetitive content in different articles; less contradictions within the same article and between related articles; more coherence between the article's theme and it's content; etc. etc.

In effect, we'll have a more attractive and higher valued Wikipedia.

Get involved[edit]

Participants[edit]

Endorsements[edit]

Expand your idea[edit]

Would a grant from the Wikimedia Foundation help make your idea happen? You can expand this idea into a grant proposal.

Expand into an Individual Engagement Grant
Expand into a Project and Event Grant

Plan[edit]

Activities[edit]

PLACEHOLDER TEXT

Impact[edit]

Target readership[edit]

PLACEHOLDER TEXT

Fit with strategy[edit]

What crucial thing will the project try to change or benefit in the Wikimedia movement? Please select the Wikimedia strategic priority(ies) that your project most directly aims to impact and explain how your project fits. Most projects fit all strategic priorites. However, we would like project managers to focus their efforts on impacting 1-2 strategic priorities. Examples of strategic priorities can be found at here.

Measures of success[edit]

Please provide a list of both quantitative and qualitative criteria that will be used determine how successful the project is. You will need to report on the success of the project according to these measures after the project is completed. See the PEG Program Resources for suggested measures of success. Note: In addition to your project-specific measures of success, you will also be asked to report on some Global Metrics at the end of your final report. Please keep this in mind as you plan, and we'll support you as you begin your project.

Resources and risks[edit]

Resources[edit]

PLACEHOLDER TEXT

Risks[edit]

PLACEHOLDER TEXT

Budget[edit]

Please provide a detailed breakdown of project expenses according to the instructions here. See Budget Guidelines. Grantees are subject to line-item scrutiny of expenses. Changes to the approved budget beyond 10% in any category must be approved in advance.

Project budget table[edit]

PLACEHOLDER TEXT

Total cost of project[edit]

PLACEHOLDER TEXT

Total amount requested[edit]

Total amount requested from the Project and Event Grants Program.

Additional sources of revenue[edit]

Additional sources of revenue, other than the Project and Event Grants Program, that may fund part of this project, and amounts funded.

Non-financial requirements[edit]

See a description of non financial assistance available. Please inform the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) of any requirements for non-financial assistance now.

Community notification[edit]

You are responsible for notifying relevant communities of your proposal, so that they can help you! Depending on your project, notification may be most appropriate on a village pump, talkpage, mailing list. Please paste a link below to where the relevant communities have been notified of this proposal, and to any other relevant community discussions. Need notification tips?