Grants:IdeaLab/Classify abandoned and new articles by importance

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Red heart with heartbeat logo.svg
Classify abandoned and new articles by importance
Create a classification for abandoned articles (or not completed or without references) and new ones (links not yet created) based on their importance (number of researches of the item in the Web, for example in Google search, or other parameters). It would be fantastic creating a competition with prices (t-shirts or pens, cheap stuff), where the most active member awards a price. It is also possibile to organize open days in some cities, where experts and active members explain some topics to people, like TedEd, but from a more professional point of view.
countryItaly
themesocial factors
contact email• csavoia93@gmail.com
Hex icon with lightning white.svg
idea creator
Itatem
this project needs...
Hex icon with hand black.svg
volunteer
Hex icon with hexes black.svg
developer
Hex icon with star black.svg
project manager
join
endorse
created on16:11, 20 July 2018 (UTC)


Project idea[edit]

What Wikimedia project(s) and specific areas will you be evaluating?[edit]

Is this project measuring a specific space on a project (e.g. deletion discussions), or the project as a whole?
The whole Wikimedia

Describe your idea. How might it be implemented?[edit]

Provide details about the method or process of how you will evaluate your community or collect data. Does your idea involve private or personally identifying information? Take a look at the Privacy Policy for Wikimedia’s guidelines in this area.
It is possible to create algorithms to measure the number of research of a specifical item in the Web, or to measure other parameters, in order to create a classification of voices on Wikimedia projects.

Are there experienced Wikimedians who can help implement this project?[edit]

If applicable, please list groups or usernames of individuals who you can work with on this project, and what kind of work they will do.

How will you know if this project is successful? What are some outcomes that you can share after the project is completed?[edit]

The most of Wikimedia project voices could be at the first places in specifical researces carried out by most used search engine.

How would your measurement idea help your community make better decisions?[edit]

After you are finished measuring or evaluating your Wikimedia project, how do you expect that information to be used to benefit the project?
Wikimedia projects could be more popular then now

Do you think you can implement this idea? What support do you need?[edit]

Do you need people with specific skills to complete this idea? Are there any financial needs for this project? If you can’t implement this project, can you scale down your project so it is doable?
Experts in algorithms can provide tools to achieve my objective.

Get Involved[edit]

About the idea creator[edit]

Hi! My name is Cosimo, I’m Italian. I am graduating in medicine, and I hope to help Wikipedia in the future, contributing to write about some pages on Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikiversity and other Wikimedia projects.

Participants[edit]

Endorsements[edit]

  • see also Quicksilver,

https://www.wired.com/story/using-artificial-intelligence-to-fix-wikipedias-gender-problem/ Slowking4 (talk) 19:30, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Expand your idea[edit]

Would a grant from the Wikimedia Foundation help make your idea happen? You can expand this idea into a grant proposal.

Expand into a Rapid Grant

No funding needed?[edit]

Does your idea not require funding, but you're not sure about what to do next? Not sure how to start a proposal on your local project that needs consensus? Contact Chris Schilling on-wiki at I JethroBT (WMF) (talk · contribs) or via e-mail at cschilling@wikimedia.org for help!