Meta:Requests for adminship/Cometstyles

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Cometstyles[edit]

This RFA is waay overdue. Cometstyles has been an active Metapedian since June, and is very active here, having made 693 edits, and 94 deleted ones. He's actively watching recent changes, and tags bad pages/reverts vandalism. Unlike a lot of admins here, he takes part in a lot of Meta affairs such as Proposals for closing projects, Requests for deletion, and general cleanup and copyediting to keep Meta pages at their best. He's an elected simple English Wikipedia admin, and regularly helps out on smaller projects, so he's very familiar with admin tools. He won't abuse them, he's an excellent guy, so I think you should support him. Thanks. Majorly (talk) 14:29, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gee..Thanks..I accept ^_^...--Comet styles 14:39, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support Majorly (talk) 14:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support :) --birdy geimfyglið _(:> )=| 14:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support con piacere --M/ 14:37, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Meno25 14:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I thought you were an admin already... Could somebody make me a list with all not-admin people who I think are admin? --OosWesThoesBes 14:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support sure!--Nick1915 -^{all you want} 14:47, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - and strongly. Will be an active asset. --Anonymous Dissident^Talk 14:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good addition to the team. --Aphaia 15:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course! --filip ⁂ 15:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support fine with me --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:17, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --.anaconda 15:43, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A. B. ^(talk) 20:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course; very helpful and a good vandal fighter/RC patroller. Cbrown1023 talk 21:35, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
+∝ --.snoopy. 21:39, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support He is a very helpful and friendly member of the meta community, and one I would definitely support becoming an administrator on. Razorflame 21:44, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely a good admin candidate. Captain panda 23:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - sure. WjBscribe 04:26, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - FrancoGG ^{( talk )} 04:30, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Always nice and helpful. :) --Az1568 04:36, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - super guy. Totally helpful and kind. I trust him absolutely - Alison ^❤ 06:37, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course :) --Millosh 10:28, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adambro 11:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
support. per Majorly. --Thogo (talk) 14:44, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support obviously. jj137 ^♠ 22:27, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support — excellent user ;-) --Agüeybaná (hábleme) 23:35, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Don't even need to think about this one. EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Greeves ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:24, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(+) -Hillgentleman 22:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good candidate. John Reaves (talk) 00:11, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jusjih 04:14, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support good fellow Gaillimh 13:54, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support GO! Cometyy --Fabexplosive The archive man 16:09, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Marbot 18:19, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Closed with rights granted. Lots of folk in favour & none against! --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I've heard it too late. I'd have supported, too, of course. —DerHexer (Talk) 10:18, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Not enough canvassing.--Werdan7 (t) 00:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]