Talk:Www.wiktionary.org template/2012

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

ml.wikt - 100,000+ entries[edit]

{{editprotected}} Please move Malayalam (മലയാളം) wiktionary (ml.wikt) to the 100,000 definition category. Thanks ! --Jacob (talk) 18:59, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Symbol wait.svg Doing... -Barras talk 12:46, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
And Yes check.svg Done. -Barras talk 13:02, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit]

Maybe it's time has already come to replace "English-centric" logo to new version? --Kaganer (talk) 09:46, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

That's actually the "old" new logo. The new logo is this. --Yair rand (talk) 12:08, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
The different language versions use different logos - perhaps it would be best to get some form of consistency between the logos usage on each of the Wiktionary sites first, then we can decide which one it best to use for the main page? The Helpful One 12:14, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Anyway, there is no representative consensus. The failure history. --Kaganer (talk) 13:51, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Update required[edit]

Li.wikt reached 100.000 articles today with wikt:li:vach. --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 12:43, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Update[edit]

I updated Www.wiktionary.org_template/temp: replaced ta with el, raised Limburgs and lowered Hindi and updated counters. Ruslik (talk) 09:09, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Per your request, I've updated the general structure as well. However it appears a few new languages are now up in the portal and need a translation for "The free dictionary" and "entries". I've saved it onto temp, but pending those translations we can't sync yet. –Krinkletalk 14:32, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
You used wrong statistics: it is actually as of 31 March and is not ordered by the number of articles. Ruslik (talk) 16:49, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
There is no need to translate anything. Ruslik (talk) 16:50, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
I didn't use the wrong statistics, the wikistats page is correct. I just wrote the wrong date in my comment (March 31 instead of today, May 28). Per the Wikipedia portal, the ones around the globe are determined by traffic. The rest is grouped and ordered by page count. If you want to do that differently for Wiktionary, then by all means do whatever you want. Make the change on /temp (1: swap the link in the comment to wikistats for another link where the wiktionaries are ordered by pagecount, 2: update wm-globle to contain the top 10 pagecount wikis instead).
Either way, in the current state of /temp there are gaps in the text and translation is needed (those texts are already translated somewhere, but the exact formulation/grammar may vary so someone who speaks that language would need to look at that). –Krinkletalk 17:59, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Well, currently wiktionary.org shows 10 largest projects by the article count. As to the statistics, Wiktionary page has newer statistics but with a large discrepancy for zhwiktionary. Ruslik (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2012 (UTC)


Why are .lang1 and .lang2 defined as 60% and 63% ? (not symmetrical). The same goes for .lang5 and .lang6 (0% and -3%). Ruslik (talk) 19:48, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Don't know, that looks off indeed. Either way, they are just synchronized from Www.wikipedia.org template. Please discuss and/or fix there, then update here. –Krinkletalk 21:30, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Is the wikistats page really correct? How can it be that Hindi dropped to 6,000 pages, while it still had 105,000 pages on 1 May? All pages and the deletion log reveal nothing's really changed there... --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 09:49, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

I don't know if it dropped. I don't know where Wiktionary/Table gets its data from. Looking at wikt:hi:Special:Statistics, I do know that currently the correct number of valid content pages for hiwiktionary is 6,182. ("valid content pages": number of pages in a namespace indicated as "content" (which on most wikis is just the main namespace) and have at least 1 link). stats.wikimedia.org uses the same algorithm as the MediaWiki software. –Krinkletalk 09:53, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Wiktionary/Table is from https://s23.org/wikistats/wiktionaries_html.php. Both statistics are in a perfect agreement as far as hiwiktionary is concerned. Ruslik (talk) 10:23, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Okay, good. So is there a problem? Although it sounds very interesting, I can't explain or confirm the apparent drop. What we have is the current data which is all we need for the portal page. –Krinkletalk 10:25, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
@Ruslik: Then please explain me how it's possible that hi.wikt dropped 100,000 articles this month. If the criteria for a page to be included as a page have changed, it should've effected other wikis as well, right? I believe we should keep Hindi in the 100,000+ section as we might be looking at a bug here. --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 10:26, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
May be somebody mistyped. Ruslik (talk) 10:35, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Another update needed[edit]

Swedish Wiktionary is now the 9th largest, having more than 311 000 entries. Bounce1337 (talk) 10:08, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

And still further[edit]

Spanish should be added to the 100k+ section. - Amgine who is not signed in and too lazy to go back and sign in.

I updated the sandbox. Ruslik (talk) 06:39, 10 January 2013 (UTC)