Универсальный Кодекс Поведения/Редакционный комитет/Сводка встреч Этапа 2

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of the page Universal Code of Conduct/Drafting committee/Phase 2 meeting summaries and the translation is 33% complete.
<translate> Universal Code of Conduct</translate>

На этой странице приведены сводки со встреч Редакционного Комитета по Универсальному Кодексу Поведения с этапа 2.

Заседание 1 - Май 13

Редакционный комитет, сотрудники Фонда Викимедиа и фасилитаторы процесса собрались вместе, чтобы создать безопасное пространство для регулировки, для понятия целей и процессов и начать готовить почву для того, чтобы комитет смог разработать принципы для обеспечения соблюдения Универсального Кодекса Поведения для движения Викимедиа.

На первой сессии редакционного комитета, члены лучше узнали друг друга, узнали о работе проделанной на первом этапе, исследованиях и консультациях, проведенных с сообществами на втором этапе, а также о текущей работе. Они также изучили правила и ожидания в отношении своей работы в комитете.

Заседание 2 - Май 18

Редакционный комитет обсудил и попросил внести окончательные поправки в соглашение о безопасном пространстве для их будущего сотрудничества. Поскольку некоторые члены внесли дополнительные предложения, они будут внедрены и члены вновь проголосуют по этим поправкам на следующем заседании.

Члены комитета также обсудили предоставленные материалы для чтения, которые помогут им разработать принципы обеспечения соблюдения Универсального Кодекса Поведения.

Изучение кросс-Вики действий и ее влияния на УКП, было главной темой второй встречи. Участники узнали, как кросс-Вики действия влияет на их собственное поведение и их поведение по отношению к другим. Также, последней частью обсуждения было, как проблемы и привилегии, связанные с гендерной идентичностью, местонахождением, социально-экономическим статусом и другими факторами, такими как образование, связаны и влияют на правоприменение УКП.

Заседание 3 - Май 27

Члены редакционного комитета, присутствующие на встрече, единогласно согласились с измененным соглашением о безопасном пространстве для их сотрудничества, а также с тем, как включить тех членов, которые не присутствуют на встрече. Члены также обсудили, как предотвратить нарушения этого соглашения и что можно сделать в случае таких нарушений.

Члены комитета обсудили косвенные предубеждения и то, как они влияют на процесс принятия решений, а также механизмы обеспечения соблюдения Универсального Кодекса Поведения. Они признают, что косвенные предубеждения могут привести к дискриминации и принятие предубеждений не препятствует объективизации. В интерактивном модуле принятия решений члены комитета приняли участие в ознакомлении с тем, как действуют различные стили принятия решений и как они могут быть использованы при разработке принципов обеспечения соблюдения УКП.

Session 4 - June 1

The drafting committee members participated in an informational session followed by a Q&A period with Maggie Dennis, the Vice President of Community Resilience & Sustainability. In the session, Maggie shared her thoughts about various aspects of the UCoC, gave a broad overview of the legal and professional landscape zoning in on the needs and expectations of enforcement from her professional perspective.

In the second part of the meeting, the drafting committee was introduced to different templates that can be used to help draft the enforcement guidelines and evaluation procedures. The committee members discussed various templates and made comments and suggestions on them. They were also encouraged to come up with their own suitable models as well.

Session 5 - June 10

The drafting committee members were given a broad introduction to asynchronous tasks they will perform in subgroups in the coming days. They were also informed about the expected workload and time commitment for future sessions. The committee members also discussed the scheduling of inter-member collaborations in their subgroups and what the suited platforms and tools for working together are best.

In the last part of the session, the members discussed different drafting templates in their own subgroups. After the session, they have shared their inputs with other group members and presented their preferences on different drafting templates they want to use to draft enforcement guidelines for the Universal Code of Conduct.

Заседание 6 — 15 июня

Drafting committee and staff member Claudia Lo briefly presented the Targets of Harassment research to the participating committee members. She talked about the research method, the knowledge obtained from it, the privacy and transparency concerns of those who participated in the survey, and the main takeaways. She also responded to the questions and comments asked by other members.

Civvì, a member of the phase 1 drafting committee, was invited to share her experiences in the committee and talk about how their process went and work challenges. She shared how the committee started drafting the UCoC code and prepared the final draft to be presented to the community.

Based on the shared experiences from the first half of the meeting and recommendations on drafting topics from the facilitator team, the drafting committee members agreed to start drafting with their chosen topics in their own subgroups.

Заседание 7 — 24 июня

During the week the drafting committee members did some asynchronous work in subgroups, during the meeting the members started to read and comment on the work of the other groups. At the end of the meeting the members decided to merge the documents every subgroup worked on in one document and to work collectively on the draft of enforcement guidelines of the Universal Code of Conduct.

Each group shared the working method, issues and results so that the members of the other subgroups have a background about the work done in every group.

Session 8 - June 29

During the week all documents from the subgroups were merged in one document, the drafting committee members worked collectively on this merged document adding comments in the sections written by the other subgroups.

In the second part of the meeting they split up again in subgroups in order to address and discuss the comments and questions left during the collective work on the part of the document they originally worked on. Some questions or comments have to be addressed by the committee as a whole, they agreed to list them and discuss them in the next session.

Session 9 - July 8

At the beginning of the meeting, committee members discussed questions about enforcement that had come up as crucial in previous meetings and had not been resolved in the asynchronous work. This included the question of how Wikimedians can be educated about the UCoC, how a projects and its volunteers can be best protected in cases where an external body, be this a group, a government, or activists tries to influence the project and how different enforcement bodies can collaborate and what data can be exchanged between them if necessary. The committee also discussed the term local in relation to global affiliates and cross-project online collaborations.

In the second part of the meeting the committee members started to work on the merged document, resolving comments and moving text into a new structure. It was decided that one member of the group would create a new document without comments and additional material, in which committee members could highlight those areas, where the group has consent already, those that need more discussion as well as gaps that need to be filled.

Session 10 - July 13

In the first part of the meeting the members of the drafting committee organized their participation in the following steps of the process deciding who is going to take care of different activities in order to have a draft ready for community review.

The rest of the meeting was spent addressing some parts of the document which need some more discussion. One important point is the level of “universality” of the enforcement and how different communities could or should deal with violations of the code of conduct.

Session 11 - July 22

The members of the committee went in detail through the text of the draft, facilitators highlighted in different colors parts which need more discussion and parts which seem more complete, the parts with higher priority were discussed thoroughly.

Another theme of the meeting concerned the best ways to seek community feedback and how to organize the phases of collecting and summarizing the feedback and incorporating it into the enforcement draft.

Session 12 - July 27

The main part of the meeting was spent addressing some last questions and resolving some controversial and complex issues.

The committee started to list some specific questions which they think should be discussed by the community. The members agreed to meet again during the week for some additional group work in order to complete the draft for community revision.

Session 13 - August 5

The drafting committee spent the whole meeting resolving the last comments in the document, looking for better wording in parts which they did not consider clear enough and adding details to some difficult sentences.

They also discussed and reorganized the questions to leave open for community discussion and how to better incorporate community feedback into the draft.