This Month in GLAM: June 2014
This Month in GLAM: July 2014
Superprotect letter update
Along with more hundreds of others, you recently signed Letter to Wikimedia Foundation: Superprotect and Media Viewer, which I wrote.
Today, we have 562 signatures here on Meta, and another 61 on change.org, for a total of 623 signatures. Volunteers have fully translated it into 16 languages, and begun other translations. This far exceeds my most optimistic hopes about how many might sign the letter -- I would have been pleased to gain 200 siguatures -- but new signatures continue to come.
I believe this is a significant moment for Wikimedia and Wikipedia. Very rarely have I seen large numbers of people from multiple language and project communities speak with a unified voice. As I understand it, we are unified in a desire for the Wikimedia Foundation to respect -- in actions, in addition to words -- the will of the community who has built the Wikimedia projects for the benefit of all humanity. I strongly believe it is possible to innovate and improve our software tools, together with the Wikimedia Foundation. But substantial changes are necessary in order for us to work together smoothly and productively. I believe this letter identifies important actions that will strongly support those changes.
Have you been discussing these issues in your local community? If so, I think we would all appreciate an update (on the letter's talk page) about how those discussions have gone, and what people are saying. If not, please be bold and start a discussoin on your Village Pump, or in any other venue your project uses -- and then leave a summary of what kind of response you get on the letter's talk page.
Finally, what do you think is the right time, and the right way, to deliver this letter? We could set a date, or establish a threshold of signatures. I have some ideas, but am open to suggestions.
This Month in GLAM: August 2014
Global CSS/JS migration
Hello Béria. You have a global.js page which contains your global scripts for all wikis. Since August 19th, your global.js and global.css pages are loaded automatically on all wikis (see announcement). Since you already load your Meta common.js yourself on many wikis (see example), you may experience script errors or issues like tools being added twice. I can fix that for you by merging your local scripts and styles into your global pages, and deleting the local pages with synchbot. Do you want me to do that? —Pathoschild 18:26, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
É por essas e várias outras
Beria e He7d3r, é por este tipo de atitude que tendo a não acreditar muito na recuperação da usuária. Às vezes fico na dúvida se ela tá de zoação com a gente. As traduções que ela fez poderiam ser lidas com graça em local apropriado. Att.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 22:27, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: September 2014
This Month in GLAM: October 2014
This Month in GLAM: November 2014
Hi Beria! Thanks for your interest in re-joining the GAC. We'll be reviewing candidates in the next couple of weeks and will make an announcment about new members by January 16th. Alex Wang (WMF) (talk) 22:59, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: December 2014
Welcome to the Grant Advisory Committee
To make your membership official, please do two things by January 23rd.
Then there are two initial tasks for active committee members to start on right away:
I will be sending out an orientation email to new members this coming week, so please keep an eye out!
Hi! I'm coming here from a discussion on the English Wikipedia, in which it was noted that it's very hard to close the Picture of the Year banner in its current state. The blue "Close" link (which is only appearing as a fallback, since the image the link should be pointing to is missing) is nearly invisible against the blue background. Would it be possible to edit the code for the ad so that the link is more visible? For instance, it could have a background color set (e.g. white at 50% alpha or something). APerson (talk) 16:01, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Another issue about "POTY_2014_R1" campaign
Please convert text of banner into translatable text strings (replace calling MediaWiki:Centralnotice-poty2010 round2 1-poty2010-text-1 and MediaWiki:Centralnotice-poty2010 round2 1-poty2010-text-2 to
This Month in GLAM: January 2015
This Month in GLAM: February 2015
Notice of review of adminship
Hello Beria. In accordance with Meta:Administrators/Removal and because you have made fewer than ten logged administrator actions over the past six months, your adminship is under review at Meta:Administrators/Removal/April 2015. If you would like to retain your adminship, please sign there before April 08, 2015. Kind regards, Matanya (talk) 13:57, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: March 2015
This Month in GLAM: April 2015
This Month in GLAM: May 2015
This Month in GLAM: June 2015
This Month in GLAM: July 2015
How can we improve Wikimedia grants to support you better?
Hi! The Wikimedia Foundation would like your input on how we can reimagine Wikimedia Foundation grants to better support people and ideas in your Wikimedia project.
After reading the Reimagining WMF grants idea, we ask you to complete this survey to help us improve the idea and learn more about your experience. When you complete the survey, you can enter to win one of five Wikimedia globe sweatshirts!
In addition to taking the the survey, you are welcome to participate in these ways:
This survey is in English, but feedback on the discussion page is welcome in any language.
Last call for WMF grants feedback!
Hi, this is a reminder that the consultation about Reimagining WMF grants is closing on 8 September (0:00 UTC). We encourage you to complete the survey now, if you haven't yet done so, so that we can include your ideas.
This Month in GLAM: August 2015
Apaga minha subpágina?
Olá Beria ! Por favor, apaga a página que eu criei: User:Luan/EditCounterGlobalOptIn.js. Não dá pra marcar com uma predefinição pelo tipo da página. Grato. --Luan (discussão) 01:52, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are beginning the transition to the new policy.
An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.
The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that OTRS volunteers sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain their access. You are receiving this email because you have been identified as an OTRS volunteer and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy. If you do not sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015, you will lose your OTRS access. OTRS volunteers have a specific agreement available, if you have recently signed the general confidentiality agreement for another role (such as CheckUser or Oversight), you do not need to sign the general agreement again, but you will still need to sign the OTRS agreement.
Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign
If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnumwikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 31 December 2015 to retain your OTRS access. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.
This Month in GLAM: September 2015
This Month in GLAM: October 2015
This Month in GLAM: November 2015
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 02:48, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: December 2015
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 17:57, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Notice of removal of global bot status from one or various accounts of yours
Hello PAGENAME}}. You are being contacted as owner of one or more accounts flagged with global bot status. This is to inform you that pursuant §1.1.4 of the global bot policy as amended by this RFC one or various of the global bots which you operate are inactive in the terms laid out by the global bot policy. As such, global bot status from those account(s) have been removed. This message is being left on Meta-Wiki and on your homewiki. We thank you for your work as global bot operator. If you have any questions or concerns, you can raise them at the Stewards' Noticeboard on Meta-Wiki. Best regards. —MarcoAurelio ~~~
Dear global bot operator: Some days ago you received a message in which you were informed that one or various accounts you hold lost a global bot flag because of inactivity. Due to a mistake, messages informing about this were not sent before removal took place as policy mandates. As such, if you think your bot will be active again on global bot duties, you can request the restoration of the global bot flag on the stewards' noticeboard at Meta-Wiki within the next two (2) weeks after this message has been posted. Please note that this removal was purely procedural based on inactivity. If you have any questions, you can reach me on my talk page at Meta-Wiki. Please accept my apologies in advance for this. Best regards. -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of MarcoAurelio at 18:11, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: January 2016
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 08:59, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Inspire Campaign on content curation & review
I've recently launched an Inspire Campaign to encourage new ideas focusing on content review and curation in Wikimedia projects. Wikimedia volunteers collaboratively manage vast repositories of knowledge, and we’re looking for your ideas about how to manage that knowledge to make it more meaningful and accessible. We invite you to participate and submit ideas, so please get involved today! The campaign runs until March 28th.
All proposals are welcome - research projects, technical solutions, community organizing and outreach initiatives, or something completely new! Funding is available from the Wikimedia Foundation for projects that need financial support. Constructive feedback on ideas is welcome - your skills and experience can help bring someone else’s project to life. Join us at the Inspire Campaign to improve review and curation tasks so that we can make our content more meaningful and accessible! I JethroBT (WMF) 05:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: February 2016
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 21:05, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Notice of removal of adminship
I regret to inform you that, in accordance with Meta:Administrators/Removal and as a result of your inactivity, administrator rights have been removed from your account. Please see Meta:Administrators/Removal/April 2016 for details. Kind regards, Barras talk 15:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: March 2016
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 12:30, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Request for Input - New Central Notice request process
Back in February I emailed the CN-admin list regarding part of my role to look into the Central Notice process and see where we could make improvements including: the campaign process; its functionality or lack thereof; and fundamentally the documentation that supports it. You can see many of the issues that I identified at CentralNotice/Process_Review. If there is anything additional that you feel has been left out then please feel free to leave any comments on the talk page.
My first task is to improve the requesting of campaigns by communities and affiliates. I am looking to set up a more formal request process, similar to those used in many projects. The aim is to: increase the transparency of Central Notice; improve the support provided to affiliates (including making such support more consistent); to provide a forum for community input into campaigns.
I have been working on a very rough strawman version of the process and I would be interested in hearing you comments about what such a process should involve and what you think it would require. Please feel free to leave such comments at the process talk page section. I would like to have a working page in place by the end of May. This would not need to be a final version. The process can be improved upon over time as we learn about how well it works.
Given your role as a Meta Administrator who is active in the area of Central Notice, I encourage you to: