User talk:COIBot/LinkReports/primaltrek.com

@Billinghurst: I restored all the links Beetstra removed as the removals were done in bad faith and I actually only added a single one of those originally. Further I would like to note that I will probably use this link a total of 4 or 5 times more, twice on Dutch Wikipedia for the articles history of Korean currency and a list of Chinese cash coins article I have yet to draft but don't have the time for(, yet), and on the nds-nl-wiki in a Gronings article on Chinese monetary history, and lastly probably only once on the Simple English Wikipedia for a list of Chinese cash coins article I'll start drafting in the coming months. I have no affiliation with this website and only restored the links to restore the verifiability of those articles, not because I want people to click on them and whatnot. There are plenty of links I've used hella more than this one and I don't have a single COI with any link I've ever used on any Wikimedia project. --Donald Trung (Talk 🤳🏻) (My global lock 😒🌏🔒) (My global unlock 😄🌏🔓) 10:00, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Also I explained all of this on my user page that admins were clearly to busy blanking to POV-railroad me to call me a spammer rather than read it, I equally use Art-Hanoi (if not more), the University of California at Santa Barbara, and a book by w:en:User:Davidhartill who you can see me talking to on his user page, does that mean I have a COI with him too? If the answer there is "no" then it's no for all of them otherwise I'd (also) be "a bookspammer" 😒. --Donald Trung (Talk 🤳🏻) (My global lock 😒🌏🔒) (My global unlock 😄🌏🔓) 10:03, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

@Donald Trung: I think that is a pretty foolish act, especially with your history. Calling Beetstra's actions bad faith is patently stupid. Continue that sort of action and those sorts of words, with that level of arrogance will just see you blocked at wikis. Don't say that you haven't been warned.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:02, 26 September 2017 (UTC)