User talk:Kusurija

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Afrikaans | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Boarisch | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | བོད་ཡིག | bosanski | català | کوردی | corsu | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | ދިވެހިބަސް | Ελληνικά | emiliàn e rumagnòl | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | Nordfriisk | Frysk | galego | Alemannisch | ગુજરાતી | עברית | हिन्दी | Fiji Hindi | hrvatski | magyar | հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Ido | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | ភាសាខ្មែរ | 한국어 | kar | kurdî | Limburgs | lietuvių | Minangkabau | македонски | മലയാളം | молдовеняскэ | Bahasa Melayu | မြန်မာဘာသာ | مازِرونی | Napulitano | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | Kapampangan | polski | português | پښتو | Runa Simi | română | русский | sicilianu | سنڌي | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | Soomaaliga | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ślůnski | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkmençe | Tagalog | Türkçe | татарча/tatarça | ⵜⴰⵎⴰⵣⵉⵖⵜ  | українська | اردو | oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча | Tiếng Việt | 吴语 | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/-

Welcome to Meta![edit]

Hello Kusurija, and welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). If you would like, feel free to ask me questions on my talk page. Happy editing! Mercy 09:52, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi all. I'm editor from Czech wikipedia. If You have some question to me, please ask me there as I rarely look to this META-WIKI page. --Kusurija (talk) 10:39, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Special:Diff/7572502[edit]

Kas yra problema? PiRSquared17 (talk) 20:21, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Seemed offensive to me. Maybe I don't understand english as much. Than I apologize. (Kame yra... I'm Czech, not Lithuanian)... --Kusurija (talk) 23:18, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Pardon. PiRSquared17 (talk) 23:23, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
It's OK ;-) --Kusurija (talk) 23:42, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Follow-up to SRGP[edit]

Hi Kusurija, I'm not familiar with the czech language projects, but there should be some conflict-resolving or arbitration instruments. A user who appropriately resorts to these tools shouldn't face any threats or perils. Otherwise, we'd have to face a much bigger problem than a rogue sysop. --MBq (talk) 17:20, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Re:MBq: Bingo! That is the very problem, we czechs are talking about. User Auvajs only asked, why there (on cs.wikisource) are not such conflict-resolving or arbitration instruments. (Among them are the rules about voting/establishing about/of sysops). Nothing more, only simple question. After it was banned indef. Was it OK? I personally think not. I'm not interested in being banned indef for askinng the same question. Nor any other user. What does it mean? --Kusurija (talk) 17:46, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
I tried to read into that problem. Apparently some arbitrations have taken place years ago, but since I don't speak your language, I didn't really understand their conflict not to mention their results. Probably it boiled down to a minority issue - the majority of the czech-speaking community did not support the claims against -jkb-? If that's the case you'd have to deal with it, afraid so. Stewards and other global brass normally refrain from intervening in projects which have sufficient local processes and elected officials. --MBq (talk) 18:02, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
OK:ad "the majority of the czech-speaking community did not support the claims against -jkb-?" - not true. Ad: "...which have sufficient local processes and elected officials...": have not sufficient + was not elected. They simply are officials, but they are not elected. There are no clear election rules. User Auvajs only put question about existence of these (nonexisting yet) rules and immediately was blocked with untrue explanation. There maybe exists some "confidential" spoken - but not written rules. It's pity, You don't understand czech language. So I naturally understand Yours questions. Excuse me, if something explained not so clear, as my english is not as splendid. Sorry. --Kusurija (talk) 19:39, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Presenting Community Engagement Insights survey report: Tuesday, October 10, 1600 UTC[edit]

Hi Kusurija,
I am reaching out to you because you signed up to receive updates about the Global Wikimedia survey.[1]

We will be hosting a public event online to present the data, a few examples on how teams will be using it for annual planning, and what are next steps for this project. The event will take place on Tuesday, October 10, at 9:00 am PST (1600 UTC), and the presentation will be in English. You can watch the livestream here, and ask question via IRC on #wikimedia-office.

If you are unable attend, you can also find the report on meta, and watch the recording of the event at a later time.

We hope to have you join us online! -- María Cruz 23:28, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

  1. Update your subscription to these messages by clicking here.

The Community Wishlist Survey[edit]

Hi,

You get this message because you’ve previously participated in the Community Wishlist Survey. I just wanted to let you know that this year’s survey is now open for proposals. You can suggest technical changes until 11 November: Community Wishlist Survey 2019.

You can vote from November 16 to November 30. To keep the number of messages at a reasonable level, I won’t send out a separate reminder to you about that. /Johan (WMF) 11:24, 30 October 2018 (UTC)